Cited by 211Coffee research and impactsBone health and osteoporosis researchVitamin D Research Studies

Effects of caffeine on bone and the calcium economy

Heaney, R.P·2002·Food and Chemical Toxicology

Abstract

Caffeine-containing beverage consumption has been reported to be associated with reduced bone mass and increased fracture risk in some, but not most, observational studies. Human physiological studies and controlled balance studies show a clear but only a very small depressant effect of caffeine itself on intestinal calcium absorption, and no effect on total 24-h urinary calcium excretion. The epidemiologic studies showing a negative effect may be explained in part by an inverse relationship between consumption of milk and caffeine-containing beverages. Low calcium intake is clearly linked to skeletal fragility, and it is likely that a high caffeine intake is often a marker for a low calcium intake. The negative effect of caffeine on calcium absorption is small enough to be fully offset by as little as 1-2 tablespoons of milk. All of the observations implicating caffeine-containing beverages as a risk factor for osteoporosis have been made in populations consuming substantially less than optimal calcium intakes. There is no evidence that caffeine has any harmful effect on bone status or on the calcium economy in individuals who ingest the currently recommended daily allowances of calcium.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0278-6915(02)00094-7

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Caffeine can influence objective and perceived cognitive performance by increasing alertness and wakefulness.

    “Caffeine can influence objective and perceived cognitive performance by increasing alertness and wakefulness (66–68).”

    From The Safety of Ingested Caffeine: A Comprehensive Review (2017) · cites this paper as [67]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heaney, R. P.
Affiliations
Creighton University (US)
Corresponding author
Heaney, R.P
Venue
Food and Chemical Toxicology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-09
Volume
40
Issue
9
Pages
1263-1270
ISSN
0278-6915 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171160817
Cited by
211
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 8
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Food and Chemical Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Vitamin D Research Studies
Keywords
caffeine, bone mass, intestinal calcium absorption, urinary calcium excretion, osteoporosis, fracture risk, milk consumption, calcium intake, caffeine-containing beverages
MeSH terms
Animals, Bone and Bones, Caffeine, Calcium, Humans, Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors, Bone Density

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review