Cited by 35Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesCongenital Ear and Nasal AnomaliesNasal Surgery and Airway Studies

Mustardé's otoplasty—evaluation of correlation between clinical and statistical findings

Minderjahn, Arthur, Hüttl, Wolf-R., Hildmann, Henning·1980·Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery

Abstract

Between 1973 and 1977 135 otoplasties were performed following the technique described by Mustardé in 1963. The follow up covered 105 of the cases (77,7%). The quality of the results and the validity of subjective and objective criteria for evaluation were evaluated statistically and compared with previous data. Three aesthetic groups were described by statistical methods. Shape and position of the corrected auricle were classified as good (53%), improved (35%), almost unchanged (12%), partial relapses 8 (7,5%), total relapses 6 (5,7%). In no case was a deteriostation observed. The head-pinna distance was measured at different points and compared with a normal sample. Calculating the head-pinna angle we found the normal range in only 33% (28 to 35 degrees), 40% were not symmetrical and in 39% an over-corrected or a moon-ear was seen, but patient and parents considered the latter cases pleasing. The influence of ear thickness on the result of the operation was investigated. In all failures (12%) the cartilage was thicker than 3,1 mm. in the triangular fossa and 3,4 mm. in the cavum. Since Mustardé's (1963) procedure is a suturing technique it is contraindicated in cases of macrotia. Experienced surgeons achieved better configuration of the antihelix and superior crus but were also responsible for 97% of the over-corrections.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0301-0503(80)80107-x

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Minderjahn, A., Hüttl, W.-R., & Hildmann, H.
Affiliations
RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Venue
Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1980-01
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
241-250
ISSN
0301-0503 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075666887
Cited by
35
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
Keywords
otoplasty, Mustardé technique, overcorrection, relapse, ear thickness, cartilage thickness, antihelix, cosmetic outcome, postoperative follow-up
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anthropometry, Child, Child, Preschool, Consumer Behavior, Ear Cartilage, Ear, External, Female, Humans, Male, Surgery, Plastic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review