Cited by 17Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesNasal Surgery and Airway StudiesCongenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies

Using bilaterally fascioperichondrial flaps with a distal and a proximal base combined with conventional otoplasty.

Irkoren, Saime, Kucukkaya, Deniz, Sivrioglu, Nazan, Ozkan, Heval Selman·2014·European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

Abstract

Prominent ears are the most common aesthetic abnormality of the external ear. Mustardè sutures and conchal setback are usually used for otoplasty, additional various cartilage-manipulation methods are also presented. One adjunctive technique that is often used involves the elevation of a fascial flap beneath which is sutured for additional cover, potentially reducing the risk of complications and recurrence. In the literature, this flap is traditionally raised with a proximal or distal base but it can be raised both distally and proximally with a number of advantages as we demonstrate. This article presents a technique to raise the fascioperichondrial flap with both a proximal and a distal base as an addition to conventional otoplasty. One hundred consecutive patients, followed up for at least 12 months, have been reviewed. One hundred ninety otoplasties were performed in 100 patients (10 unilateral), 65 women and 35 men. The mean age was 20.6 years, and the mean follow-up time was 16.3 months, respectively. No patient has developed skin necrosis or suture extrusion. In two patients (One bilateral and one unilateral for a total of three ears) a further procedure has been required to improve symmetry (1.5%). Using the retro auricular fascioperichondrial flap combined with other techniques offers good results and can be used as a standard procedure in the surgical treatment of prominent ears.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00405-013-2552-7

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Irkoren, S., Kucukkaya, D., Sivrioglu, N., & Ozkan, H. S.
Venue
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Published
2013-05-14
Volume
271
Issue
6
Pages
1389-1393
ISSN
  • 0937-4477 (ISSN-L)
  • 1434-4726
OpenAlex
W2051164581
Cited by
17
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
Keywords
prominent ears, otoplasty, ear reconstruction, postoperative complications, ear symmetry
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Ear, External, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Surgical Flaps, Suture Techniques, Cohort Studies, Patient Satisfaction, Young Adult, Dermatologic Surgical Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review