Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,566

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluating resource selection functions

Boyce, Mark S, Vernier, Pierre R, Nielsen, Scott E, Schmiegelow, Fiona K.A·2002·Ecological Modelling

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3800(02)00200-4

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Anderson, 2000, Null hypothesis testing: problems, prevalence, and an alternative, J. Wildl. Manage., 64, 912, 10.2307/3803199 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Austin, 1990, Measurement of the realized qualitative niche: environmental niches of five Eucalyptus species, Ecol. Monogr., 60, 161, 10.2307/1943043 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Austin, 1994, Determining species response functions to an environmental gradient by means of a β-function, J. Veg. Sci., 5, 215, 10.2307/3236154 · DOI
  4. Boyce, 2001, Statistics as viewed by biologists, J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat., 7, 51
  5. Boyce, 1999, Relating populations to habitats using resource selection functions, Trends Ecol. Evol., 14, 268, 10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01593-1 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Boyce, 1999, Reply to Mysterud and Ims, Trends Ecol. Evol., 14, 490, 10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01742-5 · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01742-5
  7. Burnham, 2001, Kullback–Leibler information as a basis for strong inference in ecological studies, Wildl. Biol., 28, 111, 10.1071/WR99107 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Carlson, M.J., Schmiegelow, F.K.A., 2002. Cost-effective sampling design for broad-scale avian monitoring. Conserv. Ecol., submitted for publication. · doi:10.5751/es-00438-060211
  9. Cherry, 1998, Statistical tests in publications of the Wildlife Society, Wildl. Soc. Bull., 26, 947
  10. Cohen, 1960, A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales, Educ. Psychol. Meas., 20, 37, 10.1177/001316446002000104 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Congalton, 1991, A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data, Remote Sens. Environ., 37, 35, 10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-B · DOI · Paper page
  12. Cumming, 2000, Using between-model comparisons to fine-tune linear models of species ranges, J. Biogeogr., 27, 441, 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00408.x · DOI
  13. Guisan, 2000, Ordinal response regression models in ecology, J. Veg. Sci., 11, 617, 10.2307/3236568 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Guisan, 2000, Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology, Ecol. Model., 135, 147, 10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00354-9 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Guisan, 1998, Predicting the potential distribution of plant species in an Alpine environment, J. Veg. Sci., 9, 65, 10.2307/3237224 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Jaberg, 2001, Modelling the distribution of bats in relation to landscape structure in a temperate mountain environment, J. Appl. Ecol., 38, 1169, 10.1046/j.0021-8901.2001.00668.x · DOI · Paper page
  17. Johnson, 1980, The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference, Ecology, 61, 65, 10.2307/1937156 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Johnson, 1999, The insignificance of statistical significance testing, J. Wildl. Manage., 63, 763, 10.2307/3802789 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Lennon, 1999, Resource selection functions: taking space seriously, Trends Ecol. Evol., 14, 399, 10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01699-7 · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01699-7
  20. Lennon, 2000, Red-shifts and red herrings in geographical ecology, Ecography, 23, 101, 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2000.tb00265.x · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2000.tb00265.x · Paper page
  21. Manel, 2001, Evaluating presence–absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalence, J. Appl. Ecol., 38, 921, 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00647.x · DOI · Paper page
  22. McIntosh, 1992, Competition for space between introduced brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) and a native galaxiid (Galaxias vulgaris Stokell) in a New Zealand stream, J. Fish Biol., 41, 63, 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1992.tb03170.x · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1992.tb03170.x
  23. McNay, 1994, Characterizing independence of observations in movements of Columbian black-tailed deer, J. Wildl. Manage., 58, 422, 10.2307/3809312 · DOI
  24. Metz, 1978, Basic principles of ROC analysis, Sem. Nucl. Med., 8, 283, 10.1016/S0001-2998(78)80014-2 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Monserud, 1992, Comparing global vegetation maps with the Kappa statistic, Ecol. Model., 62, 275, 10.1016/0304-3800(92)90003-W · DOI · Paper page
  26. Murtaugh, 1996, The statistical evaluation of ecological indicators, Ecol. Appl., 6, 132, 10.2307/2269559 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Mysterud, 1998, Functional responses in habitat use: availability influences relative use in trade-off situations, Ecology, 79, 1435, 10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[1435:FRIHUA]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Naesset, 1996, Use of the weighted Kappa coefficient in classification error assessment of thematic maps, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Syst., 10, 591, 10.1080/02693799608902099 · DOI
  29. Nielsen, S.E., Boyce, M.S., Stenhouse, G.B., Munro, R.H.M., 2002. Modeling grizzly bear habitats in the Yellowhead ecosystem of Alberta: taking autocorrelation seriously. Ursus. (in press).
  30. Norton, 2000, Fragments are not islands: patch vs. landscape perspectives on songbird presence and abundance in a harvested boreal forest, Ecography, 23, 209, 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2000.tb00277.x · DOI
  31. Oreskes, 1994, Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences, Science, 263, 641, 10.1126/science.263.5147.641 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Osborne, P.E., Suárez-Seoane, S., 2002. Should data be partitioned spatially before building large-scale distribution models? Ecol. Model., (in press). · DOI
  33. Otis, 1999, Autocorrelation of location estimates and the analysis of radiotracking data, J. Wildl. Manage., 63, 1039, 10.2307/3802819 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Pearce, 2000, Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression, Ecol. Model., 133, 225, 10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00322-7 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Platt, 1964, Strong inference, Science, 146, 347, 10.1126/science.146.3642.347 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Schmiegelow, 1997, Are boreal birds resilient to forest fragmentation? An experimental study of short-term community responses, Ecology, 78, 1914, 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1914:ABBRTF]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Schooley, 1994, Annual variation in habitat selection: patterns concealed by pooled data, J. Wild. Manage., 58, 367, 10.2307/3809404 · DOI
  38. Swets, 1988, Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems, Science, 240, 1285, 10.1126/science.3287615 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Swihart, 1985, Influence of sampling interval on estimates of home-range size, J. Wildl. Manage., 49, 1019, 10.2307/3801388 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Swihart, 1985, Testing for independence of observations in animal movements, Ecology, 66, 1176, 10.2307/1939170 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Vernier, P.R., Schmiegelow, F.K.A., Cumming, S.G., 2002. Modeling bird abundance from forest inventory data in the boreal mixed-wood forest of Canada. p 559–571. In: Scott, J.M., Heglund, P.J., Morrison, M., Raphael, M., Haufler, J., Wall, B. (Eds.), Predicting Species Occurrences: Issues of Scale and Accuracy. Island Press, Covello, California (draft version available at http://www.rr.ualberta.ca/research/beest/birdmodels.pdf).
  42. Yoccoz, 1991, Use, overuse, and misuse of significance tests in evolutionary biology and ecology, Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am., 72, 106, 10.2307/20167258 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Zaniewski, A.E., Lehmann, A., Overton, J.McC., 2002. Predicting species spatial distributions using presence-only data: a case study of native New Zealand ferns. Ecol. Model. (in press). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 2,566

Metadata

Authors
Boyce, M. S., Vernier, P. R., Nielsen, S. E., & Schmiegelow, F. K. A.
Venue
Ecological Modelling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-11
Volume
157
Issue
2-3
Pages
281-300
ISSN
0304-3800 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130695471
Cited by
2,566
References
7
FWCI
17.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluating resource selection functions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0304-3800(02)00200-4
The paper
Boyce, M. S., Vernier, P. R., Nielsen, S. E., & Schmiegelow, F. K. A. (2002). Evaluating resource selection functions. Ecological Modelling. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3800(02)00200-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.