Cited by 96Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Regional distribution of cortical microglia parallels that of neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer's disease

Sheffield, Lynette G, Marquis, Janet G, Berman, Nancy E.J·2000·Neuroscience Letters

Abstract

It has been postulated that microglia contribute to the development of neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) in Alzheimer's disease (AD). We compared the distribution of microglia with that of NFT in both AD and non-AD cases. In AD cases, we found that the extent of area covered by Ricinus communic agglutinin-1 labeled microglia generally paralleled NFT frequency and distribution. Microglia occupied the greatest area in tangle-rich periallocortex/allocortex, a lesser area in association cortex, and the smallest area in tangle-poor primary cortex. Interestingly, this pattern was also present in non-AD cases where there were few to no NFT. These findings suggest that regional variations in microglial distribution may constitute, at least in part, a template for the development of NFT.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3940(00)01037-5

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two papers used Ricinus communis agglutinin-1 immunohistochemistry to compare microglia counts; both reported significantly more RCA-1-labelled microglia in Alzheimer's disease in the inferomedial temporal lobe and the association cortex, periallocortex/allocortex and primary cortex.

    “Both reported significantly more RCA-1-labelled microglia in AD in the inferomedial temporal lobe115 and the association cortex, periallocortex/allocortex and primary cortex, respectively.116”
  • Microglial density is proportional to neurofibrillary tangle frequency and distribution.

    “This finding is further supported by evidence from AD cases demonstrating that microglial density is proportional to neurofibrillary tangle frequency and distribution (94).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sheffield, L. G., Marquis, J. G., & Berman, N. E. J.
Affiliations
  • SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University (US)
  • University of Kansas (US)
  • University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Berman, Nancy E.J
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-05
Volume
285
Issue
3
Pages
165-168
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2051566636
Cited by
96
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p30ag010182-05)
  • National Institute on Aging (P30AG10182)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-02528)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
microglia, neurofibrillary tangles, Alzheimer's disease, regional distribution, allocortex, association cortex, primary cortex, neuroinflammation
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Male, Neurofibrillary Tangles, Microglia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review