Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 474

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lack of pressure pain modulation by heterotopic noxious conditioning stimulation in patients with painful osteoarthritis before, but not following, surgical pain relief

Kosek, Eva, Ordeberg, Gunnar·2000·Pain

Abstract

To investigate the influence of chronic nociceptive pain on endogenous pain modulation, the effect of heterotopic noxious conditioning stimulation (HNCS) on perception of various somatosensory modalities was assessed in 15 patients with painful osteoarthritis of the hip. Thirteen patients were re-assessed when pain-free 6-14 months following surgery. Sex- and age matched healthy subjects assessed at similar time intervals served as controls. The effects of HNCS were tested using the upper extremity submaximal effort tourniquet test. Subjects rated tourniquet-induced pain intensity on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Quantitative sensory testing (QST) was performed contralaterally to the maximally painful area in 13 patients and contralaterally to the second most painful area in two patients (i.e. lateral thigh n = 12, frontal thigh n = 1, lateral calf n = 2). Sensibility was assessed before, during and 45 min following the tourniquet test. Perception thresholds to light touch were assessed using von Frey filaments and pressure pain thresholds by pressure algometry. Perception thresholds to non-painful and painful warmth and cold were determined using a Thermotest. In both sessions, patients rated the tourniquet-induced pain higher than controls at the start (P < 0.003 and P < 0.006, respectively), but not at the end of the tourniquet test. Decreased sensitivity to light touch (P < 0.001) and innocuous cold (P < 0.002) was seen during the tourniquet in patients and controls alike, on both occasions, while perception thresholds to innocuous warmth and heat pain remained unaffected. In the first session, pressure pain thresholds increased during the tourniquet test in controls (P < 0.002), but not in patients. In the second session, pressure pain thresholds increased during the tourniquet test in controls (P < 0.001) and in patients (P < 0.02). In conclusion, no pressure pain modulation was induced by HNCS in patients before surgery, as opposed to controls, suggesting a dysfunction in systems subserving 'diffuse noxious inhibitory controls' (DNIC). Normal pressure pain modulation induced by HNCS was seen when patients were re-assessed in a pain-free state following surgery, indicating that the dysfunction of DNIC had been maintained by chronic nociceptive pain.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00310-9

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 474

Metadata

Authors
Kosek, E., & Ordeberg, G.
Venue
Pain
Published
2000-10
Volume
88
Issue
1
Pages
69-78
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067346310
Cited by
474
References
2
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lack of pressure pain modulation by heterotopic noxious conditioning stimulation in patients with painful osteoarthritis before, but not following, surgical pain relief. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00310-9
The paper
Kosek, E., & Ordeberg, G. (2000). Lack of pressure pain modulation by heterotopic noxious conditioning stimulation in patients with painful osteoarthritis before, but not following, surgical pain relief. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00310-9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.