Cited by 327Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPediatric Pain Management Techniques

The pain vigilance and awareness questionnaire (PVAQ): further psychometric evaluation in fibromyalgia and other chronic pain syndromes

Roelofs, Jeffrey, Peters, Madelon L, McCracken, Lance, Vlaeyen, Johan W.S·2003·Pain

Abstract

In chronic pain patients, preoccupation with or attention to pain is associated with pain-related fear and perceived pain severity. The current study investigated psychometric properties of the pain vigilance and awareness questionnaire (PVAQ). An exploratory factor analysis on Dutch fibromyalgia patients indicated that a two-factor solution was most suitable. The first factor could be referred to as attention to pain and the second factor was interpreted as attention to changes in pain. A confirmatory factor analysis, testing three different factor structures in two independent samples (Dutch fibromyalgia patients and American pain patients with various diagnoses) showed that the goodness-of-fit indicators for all models were satisfactory. The existence of the previously reported intrusion subscale of the PVAQ as a unique construct within the PVAQ was discussed. This subscale should be further extended by non-reverse-keyed items. With regard to the convergent validity, the PVAQ was highly correlated with related constructs such as the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS), pain anxiety symptoms scale (PASS), and Tampa scale of kinesiophobia (TSK). The attention to pain subscale was significantly stronger associated with these pain-related measures than the attention to changes in pain subscale, indicating that attention to changes in pain is a distinctive construct. The uniqueness of the attention to changes in pain subscale was also supported by an exploratory factor analysis on…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00338-x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roelofs, J., Peters, M. L., McCracken, L., & Vlaeyen, J. W. S.
Affiliations
  • Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases (GB)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Roelofs, Jeffrey
Venue
Pain
Published
2003-02
Volume
101
Issue
3
Pages
299-306
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089089460
Cited by
327
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
attention to pain, pain vigilance, pain awareness, fibromyalgia, chronic pain syndromes, psychometric properties, factor structure, pain catastrophizing, pain-related anxiety, kinesiophobia, convergent validity
MeSH terms
Adult, Arousal, Awareness, Chronic Disease, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Fibromyalgia, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Measurement, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Program Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review