Cited by 82Migraine and Headache StudiesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPediatric Pain Management Techniques

Catastrophizing and Pain-Coping in Young Adults: Associations With Depressive Symptoms and Headache Pain

Open access
Buenaver, Luis F., Edwards, Robert R., Smith, Michael T., Gramling, Sandra E., Haythornthwaite, Jennifer A.·2008·The Journal of Pain

Abstract

Unlabelled Cognitive and behavioral pain-coping strategies, particularly catastrophizing, are important determinants of the pain experience. Most studies of pain-coping are performed in samples of treatment-seeking patients with longstanding pain complaints. Individual differences in pain-coping styles may also significantly affect day-to-day pain and quality of life in nonclinical samples, though this has rarely been investigated. In particular, headache pain is common in the general population, and little is known about how pain-related coping affects pain and quality of life among headache sufferers from a nonclinical setting. In this study, 202 generally healthy subjects were divided into 2 groups, those who reported problem headaches and pain-free control subjects. Reports of pain-related catastrophizing and the use of active pain-coping strategies did not differ between the groups, but differential associations between pain-coping strategies and emotional functioning were observed. Specifically, within the headache group only, those reporting higher levels of pain catastrophizing and lower levels of active pain-coping showed the highest level of depressive symptoms. Further, higher catastrophizing was associated with greater headache pain and pain-related interference. These findings suggest that catastrophizing has little influence on emotional functioning in those without ongoing pain complaints and highlight the importance of coping in modulating the consequences of pain on day-to-day functioning, even in samples from nonclinical settings. Moreover, these findings indirectly suggest that interventions that increase adaptive coping and decrease catastrophizing may help to buffer some of the deleterious functional consequences of headache pain.Perspective This study adds to a growing literature that conceptualizes catastrophizing as a diathesis, or risk factor, for deleterious pain-related consequences. These data suggest that catastrophizing may require the presence of a pain condition before its detrimental effects are exerted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.11.005

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buenaver, L. F., Edwards, R. R., Smith, M. T., Gramling, S. E., & Haythornthwaite, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Corresponding author
Buenaver, Luis F.
Venue
The Journal of Pain
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-04
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
311-319
ISSN
1526-5900 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980564682
Cited by
82
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (7k23ar051315-05)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 02225, K24NS002225, NS 051771, R21NS051771, K23NS047168)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR051315)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (F32DE017282)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
pain catastrophizing, pain coping, headache, depressive symptoms, young adults, pain interference, emotional functioning, quality of life
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aging, Anxiety, Attitude to Health, Chronic Disease, Depressive Disorder, Ethnicity, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Measurement, Quality of Life, Risk Factors, Headache Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review