Cited by 89Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Attention to pain and fear of pain in patients with chronic pain

Open access
Crombez, Geert, Viane, Ilse, Eccleston, Christopher, Devulder, Jacques, Goubert, Liesbet·2013·Journal of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

To investigate how acceptance of illness affects chronic pain in terms of attention towards pain and fearful thinking of pain. 62 participants (50 women) with chronic pain carried a palmtop computer for 2 weeks. Eight times each day auditory signals were delivered to cue participants to complete questions about their experience. Multilevel analyses indicated that on moments with more intense pain, more fearful thinking about pain, and less positive emotions, attention to pain was increased. Illness acceptance did not moderate the relation between pain intensity and attention to pain. Results further indicated that on moments with more intense pain, more negative emotions, and less positive emotions, fearful thinking about pain was increased. Of particular interest was the finding that the relationship between pain intensity and fearful thinking about pain was less strong for those high in acceptance. Pain captures attention and elicits fearful thinking about pain. Acceptance may be a useful avenue to lower negative thinking about pain, and to increase well-being in patients with chronic illnesses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10865-012-9433-1

Cites

56 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ACT could be an alternative to CBT in conditions where certain feelings, thoughts and avoidance of physical sensations may increase pain.

    “ACT could be an alternative to CBT in conditions where certain feelings, thoughts and avoidance of physical sensations may increase pain [36, 37].”

    From Symptom reduction and improved function in chronic CRPS type 1 after 12-week integrated, interdisciplinary therapy (2019) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Introduction describes pain avoidance as an unhelpful coping strategy, and the Discussion reports that acceptance weakened the association between pain intensity and fearful thoughts. The paper does not assess ACT or CBT, recommend one as an alternative to the other, or show that feelings, thoughts, and avoidance increase pain. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In that study, acceptance moderated the relationship between pain intensity and fearful cognitions of pain, such that it was weaker among those higher in acceptance.

    “However, acceptance did moderate the relationship between pain intensity and fearful cognitions of pain, such that it was weaker among those higher in acceptance.”
  • In an ecological momentary assessment study with 62 chronic pain participants, acceptance as measured by the ICQ lowered attention paid to pain on average, but did not moderate the association between attention to pain and pain intensity.

    “Acceptance was found to lower the attention paid to pain on average, but it did not moderate the association between attention to pain and pain intensity.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Larsen, R., & Diener, E. (1992). Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotion. In M.S. Clarke (Ed.), Emotion Review of Personality and Social Psychology (pp. 25-59). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crombez, G., Viane, I., Eccleston, C., Devulder, J., & Goubert, L.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • University of Bath (GB)
  • Ghent University Hospital (BE)
Corresponding author
Crombez, Geert
Venue
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2012-05-22
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
371-378
ISSN
  • 0160-7715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3521
OpenAlex
W2037307343
Cited by
89
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The University of Bath Online Publications Store (The University of Bath) (acceptedVersion)
  • Pure (University of Bath) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Vlaamse regering
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
chronic pain, attention to pain, fear of pain, acceptance of illness, pain intensity, emotional experience, positive emotions, negative emotions, cognitive appraisal of pain, well-being
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Attention, Attitude to Health, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Young Adult, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review