The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative reliability and validity of chronic pain intensity measures.
Abstract
Reliable and valid measures of pain are essential for conducting research on chronic pain. The purpose of this longitudinal study was to compare the reliability and validity of several measures of pain intensity. One hundred twenty-three patients with chronic pain were administered telephone interview versions of 0-10 scales of current, worst, least and average pain, immediately prior to beginning a multidisciplinary treatment program. The measures were administered again to these subjects 2 weeks (n=108), 1 month (n=106) and 2 months (n=105) after the end of treatment. The validity (defined as ability to detect changes in pain intensity over the course of treatment up to the 2-month follow-up assessment) and reliability (defined as stability over time in the 2 months after treatment) of these four measures and of composite combinations of these measures were examined. Contrary to prediction, the composite measures did not show a statistically significant superiority to the individual ratings in terms of their ability to detect change in pain intensity from pre-treatment to various points after treatment. The composite scores did, however, show greater stability than did the individual ratings after treatment. The practical conclusions of this study are; (1), individual 0-10 pain intensity ratings have sufficient psychometric strengths to be used in chronic pain research, especially research that involves group comparison designs with relatively large sample sizes, but, (2), composites of 0-10 ratings may be more useful when maximal reliability is necessary, (e.g. in studies with relatively small sample sizes, or in clinical settings where monitoring of changes in pain intensity in individuals is needed).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The SOPA-32 is a well-validated 32-item measure with seven subscales that measure strength of endorsement of pain-related beliefs”
From An Online Self-help CBT Intervention for Chronic Lower Back Pain (2012) · cites this paper as [40]
Citations
Cites
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,882
Psychometric theory (2nd ed.).
Sitgreaves, R. (1979) · Contemporary Psychology · doi:10.1037/018882 · Cited by 14,384
Essentials of Psychological Testing
Rosner, B., & Cronbach, L. J. (1960) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1419921 · Cited by 4,524
The short-form McGill pain questionnaire
Melzack, R. (1987) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(87)91074-8 · Cited by 4,368
Serlin, R. C., Mendoza, T. R., Nakamura, Y., Edwards, K. R., & Cleeland, C. S. (1995) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(94)00178-h · Cited by 1,493
Price, D. D., Bush, F. M., Long, S., & Harkins, S. W. (1994) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(94)90097-3 · Cited by 1,174
Increasing the reliability and validity of pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients
Jensen, M. P., & McFarland, C. A. (1993) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(93)90148-i · Cited by 720
Self-citationThe use of pain scales in assessing the efficacy of analgesics in post-operative dental pain
Seymour, R. A. (1982) · European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf00605995 · Cited by 258
Max, M. B., Schafer, S. C., Culnane, M., Dubner, R. A., & Gracely, R. H. (1988) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1038/clpt.1988.44 · Cited by 247
The use of multiple-item scales for pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients
Jensen, M. P., Turner, L. R., Turner, J. A., & Romano, J. M. (1996) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(96)03078-3 · Cited by 227
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Salovey, 1993, Am Pain Soc J, 2, 184
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,001
Ramírez‐Maestre, C., López-Martínez, A. E., & Esteve, R. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0251586 · Cited by 6
“Composites of 0-to-10 ratings are highly reliable measures of pain intensity in chronic pain patients [56].”
BackgroundLiew, B. X. W., De-la-Llave-Rincón, A. I., Arias‐Buría, J. L., Ortega‐Santiago, R., & Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C. (2021) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1093/pm/pnab241 · Cited by 6
Edmond, S. L., Werneke, M. W., Grigsby, D., Young, M., & Harris, G. (2022) · Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy · doi:10.1080/10669817.2022.2075202 · Cited by 7
Hatcher, S., Werier, J. A., Edgar, N. E., Booth, J., Cameron, D. W., Corrales‐Medina, V., Corsi, D. J., Cowan, J., Giguère, P., Kaluzienski, M., et al. (2022) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-022-06578-1 · Cited by 8
“72 for single item), and sensitivity [53].”
Protocol for randomized personalized trial for stress management compared to standard of care
Goodwin, A. M., Miller, D., D’Angelo, S., Perrin, A., Wiener, R., Greene, B., Romain, A.-M. N., Arader, L., Chandereng, T., Cheung, Y. K., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1233884 · Cited by 6
Pain Coping but Not Readiness to Change Is Associated With Pretreatment Pain-related Functioning
Finan, P. H., Burns, J. W., Jensen, M. P., Nielson, W. R., & Kerns, R. D. (2012) · Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0b013e3182400867 · Cited by 6
Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., Fernández-Mayoralas, D. M., Arroyo‐Morales, M., Ambite‐Quesada, S., Rivas‐Martínez, I., Ortega‐Santiago, R., Díaz‐Rodríguez, L., & Pareja, J. A. (2010) · Cephalalgia · doi:10.1177/0333102410382793 · Cited by 6
“An 11-point numerical pain rating scale (21) (NPRS; range: 01⁄4 no pain, to 101⁄4maximum pain) was used to assess headache intensity.”
MethodBrizzolara, K. J., Wang-Price, S. S., Roddey, T., & Medley, A. (2018) · Journal of Womenʼs Health Physical Therapy · doi:10.1097/jwh.0000000000000102 · Cited by 6
Marques, E. S., Meziat‐Filho, N., Ferreira, P. D. S., de Andrade, F. G., Ramsay, E., Corrêa, L. A., & Nogueira, L. A. C. (2018) · European Journal of Physiotherapy · doi:10.1080/21679169.2018.1531922 · Cited by 7
“NPRS demonstrated sufficient reliability and validity to be used in chronic pain research [31].”
BackgroundStrong associations among PTSD, pain, and alcohol and drug use disorders in VA primary care patients
Tiêt, Q. Q., & Moos, R. H. (2021) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108699 · Cited by 6
Manji, R., Ponzano, M., Ashe, M. C., Wark, J. D., Kendler, D. L., Παπαϊωάννου, Α., Cheung, A. M., Adachi, J. D., Thabane, L., Scherer, S. C., et al. (2022) · Physiotherapy Canada · doi:10.3138/ptc-2020-0067 · Cited by 6
Gender differences in variables associated with sleep quality in chronic tension type headache
Cigarán-Méndez, M., Fernández-Muñoz, J. J., Navarro-Pardo, E., Jiménez-Antona, C., Parás-Bravo, P., Alburquerque-Sendín, F., & Fernández-de-las-Peñas, C. (2018) · Women & health · doi:10.1080/03630242.2017.1372845 · Cited by 7
“On this diary, patients registered the number of days with headache (days/week), the headache intensity on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale (Jensen et al. 1999) (NPRS; 0: no pain, 10: the maximum pain), and the duration of each headache attack (hours/day).”
MethodMeulemeester, K. D., Cagnie, B. J., Dorpe, J. V., Lammens, M. M. Y., Petrović, M., & Calders, P. (2019) · American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/phm.0000000000001231 · Cited by 6
Pellicer-Valero, Ó., Fernández-de-las-Peñas, C., Martín-Guerrero, J., Navarro-Pardo, E., Cigarán-Méndez, M., & Florêncio, L. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10249109 · Cited by 5
“Participants registered the number of days with headache (days/week), the duration of the headache episodes (h/day), and the intensity of pain of each headache episode on an 11-point NPRS; 0: no pain; 10: the worst unimaginable pain) [16].”
BackgroundA Prospective Study to Validate an Impairment Questionnaire for Major Trauma Survivors
Marshall, S., Gray, D., Wilson, K. G., Yelle, J.-D., Hébert, P. C., O’Rourke, K., & Jamshidi, M. (2007) · American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/01.phm.0000253256.11686.23 · Cited by 6
Developing a Wellness Program for People with Multiple Sclerosis
Hart, D. L., Memoli, R. I., Mason, B., & Werneke, M. W. (2011) · International Journal of MS Care · doi:10.7224/1537-2073-13.4.154 · Cited by 6
Rabinowitz, E. P., Ripley, G., Levin, M. E., Allen, P. A., & Delahanty, D. L. (2024) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100828 · Cited by 5
Cook, K., Robertson, C., Gudivada, K. K., Mitchell, I., Nourse, M., Hosey, M. M., Paterson, C. C., & Rai, S. (2025) · Critical Care Explorations · doi:10.1097/cce.0000000000001258 · Cited by 6
Lyons, K. M., Stout, J. R., Stock, M. S., Hanney, W. J., & Anderson, A. W. (2025) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1002/ejp.70136 · Cited by 5
Kimura, N., Sato, M., Kobayashi, Y., & Naito, E. (2022) · Brain Injury · doi:10.1080/02699052.2022.2048694 · Cited by 5
Karpuz, S., Yılmaz, R., Özkan, M., Kaya, İ. Ç., Bulut, O., Erol, K., & Yılmaz, H. (2025) · Journal of Hand Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.jht.2024.12.001 · Cited by 8
Flávio‐Reis, V. H. P., Pessoa‐Gonçalves, Y. M., Diaz, C. A. V., Lamoglia, A. S. A., Desidério, C. S., & Oliveira, C. J. F. (2025) · Pain Management · doi:10.1080/17581869.2025.2467025 · Cited by 5
Edmond, S. L., Werneke, M. W., Young, M., Grigsby, D., McGill, T., & McClenahan, B. J. (2019) · Physiotherapy Research International · doi:10.1002/pri.1773 · Cited by 5
López‐de‐Uralde‐Villanueva, I., Tostado-Haro, I., Noval-Granda, B., Peña, R. F., & del Corral, T. (2020) · Musculoskeletal Science and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102138 · Cited by 5
Alschuler, K. N., Whibley, D., Kratz, A. L., Jensen, M. P., Wundes, A., von Geldern, G., Qian, P., Bombardier, C. H., & Ehde, D. M. (2021) · Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1007/s00415-021-10842-w · Cited by 5
Li, Z., Liu, L., Bai, Q., Huang, L., Li, B., Liu, Y., Liang, T., Sun, H., & Li, D. (2022) · CRANIO® · doi:10.1080/08869634.2022.2113272 · Cited by 5
Lepping, R. J., McMillan, M., Chadwick, A. L., Mansour, Z. M., Martin, L. E., & Gustafson, K. M. (2022) · Frontiers in Pain Research · doi:10.3389/fpain.2022.953118 · Cited by 5
“The BPI is validated for chronic, non-malignant forms of pain, 184 and asks patients to rate their current pain intensity, as well as their worst, least and average pain in 185 the 7 days (0-10 NRS) and has been recommended by IMMPACT as a measure of choice for the 186 assessment of pain in clinical research.(50-52) 1…”
MethodWolny, T., Glibov, K. M., Granek, A., & Linek, P. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23010501 · Cited by 5
“Pain was assessed by NPRS (numeric pain rating scale) where “0” is no pain and “10” is the most severe pain [21].”
Coutu, M., Durand, M., O’Hagan, F. T., Gosselin, P., Nastasia, I., Berbiche, D., Labrecque, M.-É., Pettigrew, S., & Bordeleau, M. (2023) · Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation · doi:10.1007/s10926-023-10155-x · Cited by 5
“It has good psychometric properties [33] and is change-sensitive [34].”
Arman, S., Menekşeoğlu, A. K., Sezgin, B., Ozgur, B., Çapan, N., & Oral, A. (2024) · European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.23736/s1973-9087.24.08432-6 · Cited by 8
Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., Ambite‐Quesada, S., Díaz, H. F.-S., Parás‐Bravo, P., Palacios‐Ceña, D., & Cuadrado, M. L. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0205516 · Cited by 5
Kaasbøll, J., Lydersen, S., Ranøyen, I., Nilsen, W., & Indredavik, M. (2018) · Journal of Pain Research · doi:10.2147/jpr.s173787 · Cited by 3
Efficacy and Practicality of Opioid Therapy in Japanese Chronic Noncancer Pain Patients
Shindo, Y., Iwasaki, S., & Yamakage, M. (2019) · Pain Management Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.pmn.2018.09.010 · Cited by 5
Soundararajan, L., Ulagendraperumal, S., Prabhakaran, R., & NaganathBabu, O. L. (2020) · International Surgery Journal · doi:10.18203/2349-2902.isj20200814 · Cited by 5
Blanco, S., Luque-Reca, O., Catalá, P., Bedmar, D., Furlong, L. V., & Peñacoba, C. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17228442 · Cited by 5
“To do this, two items assessing maximum and minimum pain intensity during the last 7 days in a numerical rating scale were used (0 = no pain, and 10 = the worst pain you can imagine) [48,49].”
MethodHorn, M., George, S., Li, C., Luo, S., & Lentz, T. A. (2021) · Journal of Pain Research · doi:10.2147/jpr.s305973 · Cited by 5
Bryce, T. N., Ragnarsson, K. T., Stein, A., & Biering‐Sørensen, F. (2011) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4377-0884-4.10055-2 · Cited by 5
Budtz, C. R., Rønnow, M. M., Stæhr, T. A. B., Andersen, N.-B. D. V., & Christiansen, D. H. (2023) · Musculoskeletal Science and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.msksp.2023.102767 · Cited by 4
Cancela‐Cilleruelo, I., Rodríguez‐Jiménez, J., Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., Cleland, J. A., & Arias‐Buría, J. L. (2023) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics13152488 · Cited by 5
“An 11-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; 0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) was used to assess pain the mean intensity of elbow pain experienced in the preceding week [14].”
MethodMental health utilization among veterans at risk for suicide: Data from a post-deployment clinic.
Miller, S. N., Monahan, C. J., Phillips, K. M., Agliata, D., & Gironda, R. J. (2018) · Psychological Services · doi:10.1037/ser0000311 · Cited by 5
Widespread Pressure Pain Hyperalgesia Is Not Related to Pain in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease
Ferreira-Sánchez, M. D. R., Verdú, M. M., Cano‐de‐la‐Cuerda, R., Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., Güeita‐Rodríguez, J., & Ortega‐Santiago, R. (2019) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1093/pm/pnz091 · Cited by 5
Pellicer-Valero, Ó. J., Martín‐Guerrero, J. D., Cigarán‐Méndez, M., Écija, C., Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., & Navarro‐Pardo, E. (2020) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym12101581 · Cited by 5
“A 10-point (0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) numerical pain rate scale [19] (NPRS) was used to evaluate the different levels of pain: mean level of hand pain, worst level of pain, and the least level of pain experienced in the preceding week.”
MethodKotecha, R. R., Schiro, B. J., Sporrer, J. M., Rubens, M., Appel, H. R., Calienes, K. S., Boulanger, B., Pujol, M. V., Suarez, D. T., Pena, A., et al. (2020) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-020-04895-x · Cited by 5
“The NRPS is a widely utilized assessment of pain intensity in oncologic clinics and has demonstrated reliability in studies of small sample sizes and in settings where repeated measurements are obtained to monitor changes in pain intensity over time [11].”
BackgroundCatalá, P., Suso‐Ribera, C., Gutiérrez, L., Pérez-Calvo, S., López-Roig, S., & Peñacoba, C. (2021) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1093/pm/pnab073 · Cited by 5
Hart, D. L., Kirk, M., Howar, J. M., & Mongeon, S. (2007) · Work · doi:10.3233/wor-2007-00602 · Cited by 5
Valencia, C., Coronado, R. A., Simon, C. B., Wright, T. W., Moser, M., Farmer, K. W., & George, S. Z. (2016) · Journal of Pain Research · doi:10.2147/jpr.s101702 · Cited by 5
“Studies have shown that this aggregate measure has sufficient psychometric strengths.(20,21)”
Williams, A. J., Lee, H., Kamper, S., O’Brien, K., Wiggers, J. H., Wolfenden, L., Yoong, S. L., Hodder, R. K., Robson, E., Haskins, R., et al. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/286757 · Cited by 5
Sampsonis, T., Karanasios, S., & Gioftsos, G. (2025) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare13141719 · Cited by 4
“This scale was administered pre-and post-intervention, showing predictive validity in chronic low back pain patients [35,36].”
Aquatic therapy compared to standard care for chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
Vaillancourt, N., Montpetit, C., Rosenstein, B., & Fortin, M. (2026) · Pain Management · doi:10.1080/17581869.2026.2613633 · Cited by 5
“The NPRS is a valid and reliable measure for detecting changes in pain levels [36,37].”
Prevalence of delirium in German nursing homes: protocol for a cross-sectional study
Dörner, J., Houdelet-Oertel, A., Arslan, Z., Lauer, R., Otte, I. C., Vollmar, H. C., Thürmann, P., Palm, R., & Holle, B. (2025) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087482 · Cited by 4
Au, I. P. H., Saraceni, N., Smith, A. J., O’Sullivan, P., Ng, L., & Campbell, A. (2025) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1002/ejp.70071 · Cited by 4
“The mean of these three pain ratings was used as a composite estimate of pain intensity (Jensen et al. 1999).”
Ackermann, L., Zeller, D., Odorfer, T., Homola, G. A., Kampf, T., Pham, M., Aster, H.-C., & Sommer, C. (2025) · Pain and Therapy · doi:10.1007/s40122-025-00770-2 · Cited by 5
“Pain intensity/catastrophizing scores were assessed by a numeric rating scale (NRS) (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain, with distances considered to be equal) [45], the German version of the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI‑”
Butera, K. A., Bishop, M. D., Greenfield, W. H., Staud, R. M., Wallace, M. R., Borsa, P. A., Fillingim, R. B., & George, S. Z. (2021) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2020.12.002 · Cited by 4
Román, C., Cumsille, P. E., & Gómez‐Pérez, L. (2021) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1093/pm/pnab144 · Cited by 4
Rasmussen, G. H. F., Madeleine, P., Arroyo‐Morales, M., Voigt, M., & Kristiansen, M. V. (2022) · The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/jsc.0000000000004320 · Cited by 4
Goadsby, P. J., Straube, A., Shibata, M., Peres, M. F. P., Amand, C., Colby, C., Margolis, M. K., Polivka, V., Stewart, A., & Constantin, L. (2025) · Pain and Therapy · doi:10.1007/s40122-024-00703-5 · Cited by 4
“…endpoint was change in headache intensity from baseline (at headache onset) to 2 h post-treatment assessment for the qualifying headache episode (defined as the first episode treated with OTC treatment only), assessed via an 11-point NRS (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable) [27, 28, 35].”
Travel‐Related Change of Residence Leads to a Transitory Stress Reaction in Humans
Blasche, G., Weissensteiner, K., & Marktl, W. (2012) · Journal of Travel Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1708-8305.2012.00624.x · Cited by 4
Mingels, S., & Granitzer, M. (2018) · Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.11.005 · Cited by 4
Pellicer-Valero, Ó. J., Martín‐Guerrero, J. D., Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., De-la-Llave-Rincón, A. I., Rodríguez‐Jiménez, J., Navarro‐Pardo, E., & Cigarán‐Méndez, M. (2021) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym13061042 · Cited by 4
“An 11-point (0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) Numerical Pain Rate Scale [16] (NPRS) was used to evaluate mean pain symptoms, as well as the worst and the lowest levels of pain symptoms experienced in the preceding week.”
MethodCalixtre, L. B., Rezende, M. A., Kamonseki, D. H., & Oliveira, A. B. (2021) · International journal of osteopathic medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ijosm.2021.05.006 · Cited by 4
PROETZEL, S., & Weigl, M. B. (2021) · European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.23736/s1973-9087.21.06553-9 · Cited by 4
Riddle, D. L., & Jafarzadeh, S. R. (2022) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Open · doi:10.1016/j.ocarto.2022.100315 · Cited by 4
“The composite knee pain scale has been shown to maximize reliability over individual item pain ratings [35].”
BackgroundParé, C., Yamada, K., & Sullivan, M. J. L. (2023) · Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0000000000001168 · Cited by 4
“24 The NRS has also shown to be a more responsive measure of pain severity when compared with other similar pain severity rating scales.”
ResultVULNERABILITY FACTORS, ADJUSTMENT, AND OPIOID MISUSE IN CHRONIC NON-CANCER PAIN INDIVIDUALS.
Ramírez-Maestre, C., Barrado-Moreno, V., Esteve, R., Serrano-Ibáñez, E., de la Vega, R., Ruíz-Párraga, G., Fernández-Baena, M., Jensen, M. P., & López-Martínez, A. E. (2024) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104606 · Cited by 3
The effect of resistance exercise on multimodal pain thresholds in local and systemic muscle sites
Lyons, K. M., Stock, M. S., Hanney, W. J., & Anderson, A. W. (2024) · Physiological Reports · doi:10.14814/phy2.16123 · Cited by 4
“(Bolton & Wilkinson, 1998; Hartrick et al., 2003; Jensen et al., 1999) Heat and PPT were performed during the baseline testing session to familiarize participants with these measures prior to the second and third session.”
MethodRíos‐León, M., Demertzis, E., García, R. P., & Taylor, J. (2024) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare12222300 · Cited by 4
“Pain ratings associated with cold water were obtained during immersion at 10 s intervals and immediately thereafter using an NRS (0: no pain; 10: maximum pain) [55] to determine tonic cold pain intensity during CPT.”
Cha, Y.-J., & Kim, K. (2011) · The Journal of the Korea Contents Association · doi:10.5392/jkca.2011.11.5.224 · Cited by 4
“VAS 는현재 환자 자신이 허리부위에느끼는 통증 정도를 ‘0 점’(통증 없음) ∼ ‘10점’(표현할 수 없을 정도로 아픔) 의범위 안에서 1점단위로 자가-기입식으로 기록하는 검사 방법으로 일반적으로 많이 사용되고 있는 시각적 상사척도이다[12].”
Gallart‐Aragón, T., Fernández‐Lao, C., Galiano‐Castillo, N., Cantarero‐Villanueva, I., Lozano‐Lozano, M., & Arroyo‐Morales, M. (2017) · Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques · doi:10.1089/lap.2017.0415 · Cited by 4
Do Patients Undergoing Physical Testing Report Pain Intensity Reliably?
White, S., McNair, P. J., Laslett, M., & Hing, W. A. (2014) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/acr.22530 · Cited by 4
Psychometric Evaluation and Refinement of the Pain Response Preference Questionnaire
McWilliams, L. A., Kowal, J., Sharpe, D., & Dick, B. D. (2014) · Pain Research and Management · doi:10.1155/2014/532678 · Cited by 4
“Participants rated each item using an 11-point numerical rating scale (11) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (as intense as you can imagine).”
MethodCancela‐Cilleruelo, I., Rodríguez‐Jiménez, J., Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., Cleland, J. A., & Arias‐Buría, J. L. (2024) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/pzae075 · Cited by 3
Ramírez‐Maestre, C., Esteve, R., Serrano‐Ibáñez, E. R., & López-Martínez, A. E. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0334918 · Cited by 3
“Such composite scores have been shown to be very reliable in individuals with chronic pain [52].”
Effects of TDCS and TENS on chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled clinical trial
Diniz, L. S. M., Mousinho, R. R. D. S., Cavalcante, L. L., Andrade, S. M. M. D. S., dos Santos, H. H., & de Andrade, P. R. (2025) · Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies · doi:10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.10.044 · Cited by 3
Imamura, K., Machii, M., Yao, K., Sou, S., Nagahama, T., Yao, T., Kanemitsu, T., Miyaoka, M., Ohtsu, K., & Ueki, T. (2021) · Endoscopy International Open · doi:10.1055/a-1352-2761 · Cited by 3
“Abdominal pain severity was graded using a numerical rating scale (NRS) from 0 to 10 (0, no pain; 10, worst imaginable pain) [10].”
MethodHertogh, W. D., Amons, A. L., daele, L. V., Vanbaelen, E., & Castien, R. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm11216273 · Cited by 4
Kleftouris, G., Tosounidis, T. H., Panteli, M., Gathen, M., & Giannoudis, P. V. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm12134237 · Cited by 5
“Baseline characteristics included patient demographics, comorbidities, level of mobility, place of residence, pre-operative pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) [13], and functional and quality of life questionnaires.”
BackgroundInfluentialPodschun, L., Hill, C., Kolber, M. J., & McClure, P. W. (2024) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/pzae029 · Cited by 3
Geete, D. B., & Mhatre, B. (2024) · Spine · doi:10.1097/brs.0000000000005047 · Cited by 3
Ussing, K., Smith, A. J., & O’Sullivan, P. (2024) · Scandinavian Journal of Pain · doi:10.1515/sjpain-2024-0040 · Cited by 3
Bell, T. R., Felix, C., Gider, N., Rebok, G. W., Crowe, M., Ball, K., Wallace, G., Black, S., Thomas, K. R., Wheeler, K. M., et al. (2025) · Experimental Gerontology · doi:10.1016/j.exger.2025.112891 · Cited by 3
“…has shown that this SF-36 pain item correlates well with comprehensive pain scales, such as the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and the McGill Pain Questionnaire, supporting construct validity (rs ranges from 0.76 to 0.79) (Gandek et al., 2004; Jensen et al., 1999; Ware Jr. and Sherbourne, 1992).”
InfluentialKotecha, R. R., Gal, O., Appel, H. R., Avendano, M. C., Pimentel, A. M., Starosciak, A. K., Rubens, M., Roy, M., Perche, D. C., Pow-Sang, C. I., et al. (2025) · Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noaf231 · Cited by 3
Using a worst pain intensity measure in children and adolescents
Avian, A., Messerer, B., Meißner, W., Sandner‐Kiesling, A., Kammel, J., Labugger, M., Weinberg, A., & Berghold, A. (2017) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.13271 · Cited by 3
Tomkins‐Lane, C., Zheng, P. Z., Sun, R., & Smuck, M. W. (2020) · The Spine Journal · doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2020.06.003 · Cited by 3
Sánchez-Jorge, S., Oliva‐Pascual‐Vaca, Á., Rodríguez‐López, E. S., & Valera‐Calero, J. A. (2020) · Physikalische Medizin Rehabilitationsmedizin Kurortmedizin · doi:10.1055/a-1189-3460 · Cited by 3
“Reliability and validity testing of the VAS has been well documented in previous studies [21, 22].”
ResultDereli, M., Kahraman, T., & France, C. R. (2022) · Evaluation & the Health Professions · doi:10.1177/01632787221127377 · Cited by 3
Catalá, P., Gutiérrez, L., Écija, C., & Peñacoba, C. (2021) · Ansiedad y Estrés · doi:10.5093/anyes2022a21 · Cited by 3
“All these measures were rated with an 11-point numerical rating scale (0 = “no pain” and 10 = “the worst pain you can imagine”) (Jensen et al., 1996, 1999).”
MethodValidation of the Japanese version of the 8-item Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ-8)
Fukumori, T., Fujishima, K., Iwasa, K., Takao, Y., Kobayashi, Y., & Nishie, H. (2023) · The Journal of Medical Investigation · doi:10.2152/jmi.70.88 · Cited by 3
Maihöfner, C., de Haas, A., Sethi, V. S., Shanga, G. M., Wilcox, T. K., Csőke, E., & Fabrikant, K. (2023) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1080/03007995.2023.2243804 · Cited by 3
“The NRS ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) 23 .”
BackgroundDigital mapping of shoulder pain in patients with shoulder disorders: a reliability study
Boudreau, S. A., Jakobsen, T. L., Haraldsson, B. T., & Clausen, M. B. (2024) · Physiotherapy Theory and Practice · doi:10.1080/09593985.2023.2300753 · Cited by 3
“As such, pain intensity is the average of the lowest, worst and average pain during the previous week and their current pain (Jensen, Turner, Romano, and Fisher, 1999).”
Rothrock, R. J., Ozair, A., Avendano, M. C., Herrera, S., Appel, H. R., Ramos, S., Starosciak, A. K., Leon-Ariza, D. S., Rubens, M., McDermott, M. W., et al. (2024) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-023-07850-8 · Cited by 3
Escobar-Sánchez, I., Ríos‐León, M., & Taylor, J. (2024) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2023.1337711 · Cited by 3
Fang, Y., Liu, M., Wu, M., Liu, M., Niu, T., & Zhang, X. (2024) · Nursing and Health Sciences · doi:10.1111/nhs.13097 · Cited by 3
Hernández-Secorún, M., Abenia-Benedí, H., Lucha-López, M. O., Durán‐Serrano, M., Hamam-Alcober, J. S., Krauss, J., & Hidalgo-García, C. (2024) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm14080801 · Cited by 3
“They were instructed to mark the average pain intensity they experienced during the last week [18].”
BackgroundGoodwin, A. M., Chiuzan, C. C., Friel, C. P., Miller, D., Rodillas, J., Duer-Hefele, J., Cheung, Y. K., & Davidson, K. W. (2024) · Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications · doi:10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101364 · Cited by 3
“…receive a health survey, which includes the PSS-10 [23], the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) [24], and additional ecological momentary assessment (EMA)-adapted questions from the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (momentary pain, fatigue, stress, mood, confidence, and concentration levels) [25,26].”
BackgroundCharacteristics of headaches among surgeons and associated factors: A cross-sectional study
Alhusuny, A., Cook, M., Khalil, A., Thomas, L. C., & Johnston, V. (2020) · The Surgeon · doi:10.1016/j.surge.2020.07.012 · Cited by 3
Abbott, A. D., Gustafsson, K., Zhou, C., Rolfson, O., & Svensson, G. L. (2021) · Acta Orthopaedica · doi:10.1080/17453674.2021.1992932 · Cited by 3
Cigarán‐Méndez, M., Pellicer-Valero, Ó. J., Martín‐Guerrero, J. D., Varol, U., Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., Navarro‐Pardo, E., & Valera‐Calero, J. A. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19084682 · Cited by 4
Harrison, D. E., Harrison, D. D., Oakley, P. A., & Haas, J. W. (2006) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 3
Effectiveness of Lower Trapezius Exercise in Pain and Disability among Chronic Neck Pain Subjects
Kamalakannan, M., & Anitha, A. (2015) · International Journal of Therapies and Rehabilitation Research · doi:10.5455/ijtrr.000000104 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Jensen, M. P., Turner, J. A., Romano, J. M., & Fisher, L. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jensen, Mark P
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 157-162
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009568727
- Cited by
- 1,247
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 92 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 52
- FWCI
- 6.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- U.S. Public Health Service (R01 31683)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- chronic pain, pain intensity assessment, reliability statistics, validity, multidisciplinary pain management, longitudinal change detection
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Analgesics, Analysis of Variance, Chronic Disease, Counseling, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Occupational Therapy, Pain, Pain Measurement, Patient Care Team, Psychotherapy, Socioeconomic Factors, Time Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Physical Therapy Modalities, Pain Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review