The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative reliability and validity of chronic pain intensity measures.
Abstract
Reliable and valid measures of pain are essential for conducting research on chronic pain. The purpose of this longitudinal study was to compare the reliability and validity of several measures of pain intensity. One hundred twenty-three patients with chronic pain were administered telephone interview versions of 0-10 scales of current, worst, least and average pain, immediately prior to beginning a multidisciplinary treatment program. The measures were administered again to these subjects 2 weeks (n=108), 1 month (n=106) and 2 months (n=105) after the end of treatment. The validity (defined as ability to detect changes in pain intensity over the course of treatment up to the 2-month follow-up assessment) and reliability (defined as stability over time in the 2 months after treatment) of these four measures and of composite combinations of these measures were examined. Contrary to prediction, the composite measures did not show a statistically significant superiority to the individual ratings in terms of their ability to detect change in pain intensity from pre-treatment to various points after treatment. The composite scores did, however, show greater stability than did the individual ratings after treatment. The practical conclusions of this study are; (1), individual 0-10 pain intensity ratings have sufficient psychometric strengths to be used in chronic pain research, especially research that involves group comparison designs with relatively large sample sizes, but, (2), composites of 0-10 ratings may be more useful when maximal reliability is necessary, (e.g. in studies with relatively small sample sizes, or in clinical settings where monitoring of changes in pain intensity in individuals is needed).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The SOPA-32 is a well-validated 32-item measure with seven subscales that measure strength of endorsement of pain-related beliefs”
From An Online Self-help CBT Intervention for Chronic Lower Back Pain (2012) · cites this paper as [40]
Citations
Cites
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,882
Psychometric theory (2nd ed.).
Sitgreaves, R. (1979) · Contemporary Psychology · doi:10.1037/018882 · Cited by 14,384
Essentials of Psychological Testing
Rosner, B., & Cronbach, L. J. (1960) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1419921 · Cited by 4,524
The short-form McGill pain questionnaire
Melzack, R. (1987) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(87)91074-8 · Cited by 4,368
Serlin, R. C., Mendoza, T. R., Nakamura, Y., Edwards, K. R., & Cleeland, C. S. (1995) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(94)00178-h · Cited by 1,493
Price, D. D., Bush, F. M., Long, S., & Harkins, S. W. (1994) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(94)90097-3 · Cited by 1,174
Increasing the reliability and validity of pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients
Jensen, M. P., & McFarland, C. A. (1993) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(93)90148-i · Cited by 720
Self-citationThe use of pain scales in assessing the efficacy of analgesics in post-operative dental pain
Seymour, R. A. (1982) · European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf00605995 · Cited by 258
Max, M. B., Schafer, S. C., Culnane, M., Dubner, R. A., & Gracely, R. H. (1988) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1038/clpt.1988.44 · Cited by 247
The use of multiple-item scales for pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients
Jensen, M. P., Turner, L. R., Turner, J. A., & Romano, J. M. (1996) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(96)03078-3 · Cited by 227
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Salovey, 1993, Am Pain Soc J, 2, 184
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,001
Theis, K. A., Brady, T. J., & Sacks, J. J. (2018) · JCR Journal of Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.1097/rhu.0000000000000896 · Cited by 10
Arias‐Buría, J. L., Franco-Hidalgo-Chacón, M. M., Cleland, J. A., Palacios‐Ceña, M., Fuensalida‐Novo, S., & Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C. (2020) · Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2019.02.011 · Cited by 10
Arias‐Buría, J. L., Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., Rodríguez‐Jiménez, J., Plaza‐Manzano, G., Cleland, J. A., Gallego‐Sendarrubias, G. M., & López‐de‐Uralde‐Villanueva, I. (2020) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics10110882 · Cited by 10
Alhusuny, A., Cook, M., Khalil, A., & Johnston, V. (2021) · International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health · doi:10.1007/s00420-020-01642-2 · Cited by 10
“The severity of neck/shoulder problems in the last 7 days was assessed with Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) using an 11-items scale anchored at 0 representing “no pain” and 10 “unbearable pain” (Jensen et al. 1999).”
MethodSillevis, R., Trincado, G., & Shamus, E. (2021) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.11543 · Cited by 10
Park, C., Cook, C. E., Garcia, A. N., & Gottfried, O. N. (2021) · Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106801 · Cited by 10
Rodríguez-Huguet, M., Góngora-Rodríguez, J., Viñolo-Gil, M. J., Martín-Vega, F. J., Martín‐Valero, R., & Rodríguez‐Almagro, D. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm11071984 · Cited by 12
Replicability and reliability of pain assessment forms in geriatrics
Döventaş, A., Karadağ, B., Çurgunlu, A., Bilici, A. E., Süt, N., Erdinçler, D. S., Beger, T., & Tezcan, V. (2010) · Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics · doi:10.1016/j.archger.2010.10.017 · Cited by 10
“The necessity of validation studies is mentioned in studies of Koh et al. (1998) and El Meidany et al.”
BackgroundThe validity of average 8‐h pain intensity assessment in cancer patients
Caraceni, A. T., Zecca, E., Martini, C., Brunelli, C., Pigni, A., Gorni, G., Galbiati, A., Ibazeta, M., Hjermstad, M. J., & Kaasa, S. (2009) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.07.004 · Cited by 10
“…multiple measures over time, or multiple aspects of pain at the same time, enhances the validity of pain intensity measures, and that 3 daily assessments for 4 days give an accurate quantitative representation of the chronic pain experienced (Jensen and McFarland, 1993; Jensen et al., 1999, 1996).”
BackgroundBarton, P. M., Schultz, G., Jarrell, J. F., & Becker, W. J. (2014) · Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain · doi:10.1111/head.12376 · Cited by 10
Castel, A., Cascón‐Pereira, R., Salvat, M., Sala, J. M., Padrol, A., Pérez, M., & Rull, M. (2008) · Hispana · Cited by 10
McWilliams, L. A., Kowal, J., Verrier, M. J., & Dick, B. D. (2016) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1093/pm/pnw346 · Cited by 10
Esparza, W. D., Aladro-Gonzalvo, A. R., & Rybarczyk, Y. P. (2019) · Rehabilitation Research and Practice · doi:10.1155/2019/5360924 · Cited by 10
Beneciuk, J. M., Ballengee, L. A., & George, S. Z. (2019) · Musculoskeletal Science and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.msksp.2019.03.004 · Cited by 14
Gralow, I. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-49663-2_5 · Cited by 10
Alschuler, K. N., Krabak, B. J., Kratz, A. L., Jensen, M. P., Pomeranz, D., Burns, P., Bautz, J., Nordeen, C. A., Irwin, C., & Lipman, G. S. (2020) · Wilderness and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.wem.2019.10.007 · Cited by 9
Exploring Changes in Activity Patterns in Individuals with Chronic Pain
Serrano‐Ibáñez, E. R., Bendayan, R., Ramírez‐Maestre, C., López-Martínez, A. E., Ruiz-Párraga, G. T., Peters, M. L., & Esteve, R. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17103560 · Cited by 9
“A composite pain intensity score was calculated for each day by calculating the average of the mildest, average, worst, and current pain [19].”
MethodBarone, M., Imaz, F., Bordachar, D., Ferreira, I. C., & Intelangelo, L. (2021) · Physiotherapy Theory and Practice · doi:10.1080/09593985.2021.1878567 · Cited by 9
Chu, H., Park, S.-J., Jeong, Y., Kim, S.-H., Yeom, S.-R., Lee, S., & Youn, B.-Y. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20287 · Cited by 12
“The NRS scale was used to measure pain intensity, ranging from no pain (0) to the worth pain imaginable (10); the pain intensity was measured in relation to pain at the present day [14].”
Villafañe, J. H., Valdes, K. A., Imperio, G., Borboni, A., Cantero‐Téllez, R., Galeri, S., & Négrini, S. (2017) · Journal of Physical Therapy Science · doi:10.1589/jpts.29.801 · Cited by 9
Ribeiro, L. P., Cools, A. M. J., & Camargo, P. R. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040820 · Cited by 9
Riddle, D. L., & Dumenci, L. (2022) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/acr.24962 · Cited by 9
Physical and Mental Functioning in Disability Pensioners with Back Pain
Magnussen, L. H., Strand, L. I., & Eriksen, H. R. (2009) · Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain · doi:10.1080/10582450802672339 · Cited by 9
“Several studies have described work-related functional ability of individuals on short- and long-term sick leave due to LBP (8–12).”
BackgroundInfluentialYang, S.-Y., McCracken, L. M., & Moss-Morris, R. E. (2016) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1093/pm/pnw175 · Cited by 9
Briest, J., & Bethge, M. (2016) · Der Schmerz · doi:10.1007/s00482-016-0172-z · Cited by 9
Impairment, disability and fatigue in multiple sclerosis.
Shahrbanian, S., Duquette, P., & Mayo, N. E. (2018) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · doi:10.22088/cjim.9.3.244 · Cited by 10
“Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of NRS have been documented (16, 17).”
MethodFernández-de-las-Peñas, C., Palacios-Ceña, M., Castaldo, M., Wang, K.-L., Guerrero-Peral, Á., Catena, A., & Arendt-Nielsen, L. (2020) · BMC Neurology · doi:10.1186/s12883-020-1624-8 · Cited by 9
Gómez-Pérez, L., Cumsille, P., & Román, C. (2020) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110280 · Cited by 9
Sato, S., Ukimoto, S., Kanamoto, T., Sasaki, N., Hashimoto, T., Saito, H., Hida, E., Sato, T., Mae, T., & Nakata, K. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-91731-0 · Cited by 11
Sanromán, L., Catalá, P., Écija, C., Suso‐Ribera, C., Román, J. S., & Peñacoba, C. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19074198 · Cited by 9
“Pain: Four items assessing maximum, minimum and the average pain intensity during the last 7 days and pain at that moment in a numerical rating scale were used (0 = no pain, and 10 = the worst pain you can imagine) [46,47].”
MethodRíos‐León, M., Valera‐Calero, J. A., Ortega‐Santiago, R., Varol, U., Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., & Plaza‐Manzano, G. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph191610301 · Cited by 9
“Pain Intensity An 11-point numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain), was used to determine the pain intensity [27].”
MethodButler, M. J., D’Angelo, S., Lewis, C., Miller, D., Perrin, A., Suls, J. M., Chandereng, T., Cheung, Y. K. K., & Davidson, K. W. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055518 · Cited by 8
Miller, J., MacDermid, J. C., Walton, D. M., & Richardson, J. A. (2015) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0994-5 · Cited by 13
Fernández‐Carnero, J., Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., & Cleland, J. A. (2009) · Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain · doi:10.3109/10582450903284802 · Cited by 9
“A 10-cm visual analog scale [VAS; range: 0 = no pain, to 10 = maximum pain] was used to assess the following pain measures (19): (1) current level of lateral elbow pain, (2) worst level of lateral elbow pain experienced in the preceding 24 hours at rest, and (3) worst level of lateral elbow pain experienced in the pre…”
MethodMeasuring patient-specific outcomes in musculoskeletal clinical practice: a pilot study.
Hefford, C., Lodge, S., & Abbott, J. H. (2008) · Cited by 9
Waters, S. J., Strauman, T. J., McKee, D. C., Campbell, L. C., Shelby, R. A., Dixon, K. E., Fras, A. M., & Keefe, F. J. (2015) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503307.2015.1040485 · Cited by 9
Pilot study of a basic individualized cognitive behavioral therapy program for chronic pain in Japan
Hosogoshi, H., Iwasa, K., Fukumori, T., Takagishi, Y., Takebayashi, Y., Adachi, T., Oe, Y., Tairako, Y., Takao, Y., Nishie, H., et al. (2020) · BioPsychoSocial Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13030-020-00176-w · Cited by 9
Rodríguez-Huguet, M., Rodríguez-Huguet, P., Lomas‐Vega, R., Ibáñez‐Vera, A. J., & Rodríguez‐Almagro, D. (2020) · Complementary Therapies in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102449 · Cited by 9
Hansson, Y., Carlsson, C. P. O., & Olsson, E. (2008) · Acupuncture in Medicine · doi:10.1136/aim.26.4.214 · Cited by 9
“A single rating of pain has sufficient psychometric strength to be useful in comparing relatively large groups of individuals with chronic pain.(18) PLW is often used in primary care.”
Assessment of Pain After SCI in Clinical Trials
Bryce, T. N., & Dijkers, M. P. J. M. (2005) · Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation · doi:10.1310/bmq9-wvpa-ju7u-jpn0 · Cited by 9
O’Brien, K. M., Williams, A. J., Wiggers, J. H., Wolfenden, L., Yoong, S. L., Campbell, E. M., Kamper, S. J., McAuley, J. H., Attia, J., Oldmeadow, C. J., et al. (2016) · PubMed Central · doi:10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0189 · Cited by 8
Castro‐Sánchez, A. M., Gil-Martínez, E., Fernández-Sánchez, M., Lara‐Palomo, I. C., Nastasia, I., Querol-Zaldívar, M. D. L. Á., & Aguilar‐Ferrándiz, M. E. (2021) · The Spine Journal · doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2021.05.002 · Cited by 8
Gaballah, S. H., El-Deen, D. S., & Hebeshy, M. I. (2023) · Applied Nursing Research · doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2023.151719 · Cited by 8
Rønnow, M. M., Stæhr, T. A. B., & Christiansen, D. H. (2021) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12891-021-04612-y · Cited by 9
Community directed assessment of pain in a northern Saskatchewan Cree community
Zhang, T., Dorian, E. R., Sewap, S., Johnson, R., Foulds, H. J. A., Bath, B. L., & Lovo, S. (2024) · International Journal of Circumpolar Health · doi:10.1080/22423982.2023.2300858 · Cited by 8
“NPRS has shown responsiveness in measuring pain intensity [20]; however, the ethnicity of participants within many studies were white/European-descent or not specified; therefore, the efficacy of NPRS among Indigenous individuals should not be assumed [21,22,23].”
BackgroundPurushotham, S., Hodson, N. W., Greig, C. A., Gardner, A. C., & Falla, D. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-83373-9 · Cited by 8
Juckett, D. A., Davis, F. N., Gostine, M., Reed, P. L., & Risko, R. (2015) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-015-0164-4 · Cited by 8
“This degree of improvement was consistent with previous validation studies on small patient numbers utilizing other pain scale tools [34–36].”
ResultVertebral Bone Mineral Measures and Psychological Wellbeing among Individuals with Modic Changes
Briggs, A. M., O’Sullivan, P., Foulner, D., & Wark, J. D. (2012) · Clinical Medicine Insights Case Reports · doi:10.4137/ccrep.s9209 · Cited by 8
AlOtaibi, K. D., & El-Sobkey, S. B. (2015) · Journal of the Saudi Heart Association · doi:10.1016/j.jsha.2015.02.002 · Cited by 8
“The NRS is a short, easyto-administer, validated measure of pain intensity [31,32].”
BackgroundFernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., Benito-González, E., Palacios‐Ceña, M., Wang, K., Castaldo, M., & Arendt‐Nielsen, L. (2017) · The Journal of Headache and Pain · doi:10.1186/s10194-017-0751-0 · Cited by 8
“(hours/day), and the intensity of pain of each episode on an 11-points numerical pain rate scale (NPRS; 0: no pain; 10: the worst unimaginable pain) [16].”
BackgroundPalacios‐Ceña, M., Wang, K., Castaldo, M., Peral, Á. L. G., Caminero, A. B., Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., & Arendt‐Nielsen, L. (2017) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1002/ejp.1065 · Cited by 8
Walton, D. M., & Marsh, J. D. (2018) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1002/ejp.1224 · Cited by 8
“…assessment, PROs enable capture of a broad range of constructs from the patient’s perspective, including the intensity (severity) of the pain itself (Jensen et al., 1999), pain-related activity and participation restrictions (Vernon and Mior, 1991; Chapman et al., 2011), pain-related beliefs and…”
BackgroundAn international study of analgesic dependence among people with pain in the general population
Said, O., Elander, J., & Maratos, F. A. (2019) · Substance Use & Misuse · doi:10.1080/10826084.2019.1577457 · Cited by 8
Griffin, R. S., Antoniak, M., Mac, P. D., Kramskiy, V., Waldman, S. A., & Mimno, D. (2020) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.01331 · Cited by 8
“The construct validity of the pain NRS, i.e., whether it actually measures what it is used to measure (Elasy and Gaddy, 1998), has not been fully resolved (Jensen et al., 1999; Chapman et al., 2011).”
BackgroundMethodAssociation between cancer stigma, pain and quality of life in breast cancer
Nakash, O., Granek, L., Cohen, M., & David, M. A. B. (2020) · Psychology Community & Health · doi:10.5964/pch.v8i1.310 · Cited by 8
“The measure shows good psychometric properties for assessing chronic pain (Jensen et al., 1999).”
BackgroundRelationship between low back pain and lumbar and hip joint movement in desk workers
Nishimura, T., & Miyachi, R. (2020) · Journal of Physical Therapy Science · doi:10.1589/jpts.32.680 · Cited by 9
Díaz-Pulido, B., Pérez-Martín, Y., Pecos‐Martín, D., Rodríguez‐Costa, I., Pérez-Muñoz, M., Calvo-Fuente, V., Ortiz-Jiménez, M. F., & Asúnsolo, Á. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm10153245 · Cited by 8
“Other studied variables (descriptive, prognostic, or control) that could have an influence on active mobility and endurance were age, gender, physical disability (according to the Spanish translation of NDI [57], in which a 0 score indicates no disability and 50 the highest disability), pain intensity (measured in mil…”
MethodInfluentialTuran, K., Sarı, Z., & Özden, F. (2023) · Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · doi:10.1007/s00508-023-02224-1 · Cited by 8
“It has been demonstrated that the scale is valid and reliable for measuring pain intensity in patients with chronic pain [25].”
Castel, L. D., Wallston, K. A., Saville, B. R., Alvarez, J., Shields, B. D., Feurer, I. D., & Cella, D. F. (2015) · Patient Related Outcome Measures · doi:10.2147/prom.s47997 · Cited by 8
“The Regional Pain Scale has only four response options (none, mild, moderate, or severe),(24) while 11-point (0–10) numeric rating scales have been demonstrated in past methodological research to have a higher degree of sensitivity and validity for pain assessment.(25) A reliable and valid measure of arthralgia severi…”
Jensen, M. P., Schnitzer, T. J., Wang, H., Smugar, S. S., Peloso, P. M. J., & Gammaitoni, A. R. (2011) · Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0b013e3182236209 · Cited by 8
Myofascial Pain Syndrome as a Contributing Factor in Patients with Chronic Headaches
Sanitá, P. V., & Alencar, F. G. P. (2009) · Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain · doi:10.1080/10582450802672404 · Cited by 8
“Headache intensity was measured using visual analogue scales [VAS 0 to 10 scale] (17).”
MethodEffect of Behavioral Activation Treatment on fibromyalgia-related pain anxiety cognition.
Lundervold, D. A., Talley, C., & Buermann, M. (2006) · International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy · doi:10.1037/h0100768 · Cited by 8
Gondhalekar, G. A. (2016) · JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH · doi:10.7860/jcdr/2016/14987.7142 · Cited by 8
Palacios‐Ceña, M., Castaldo, M., Wang, K., Madeleine, P., Peral, Á. L. G., Arendt‐Nielsen, L., & Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C. (2017) · Pain Practice · doi:10.1111/papr.12565 · Cited by 8
“Subjects needed to report no more than 1 of the symptoms photophobia, phonophobia, or mild nausea, and no moderate or severe nausea or vomiting as requested by the ICHD-III diagnostic criteria.17 Patients were classified with FETTH when they suffered from at least 10 episodes of headache occurring on 1 to 14 days per…”
BackgroundRettenmaier, M. A., Micha, J. P., Lopez, K. L., Wilcox, A. M., & Goldstein, B. H. (2017) · Surgical Innovation · doi:10.1177/1553350617718080 · Cited by 8
Oncology Section EDGE Task Force on Cancer: A Systematic Review of Clinical Measures for Pain
Harrington, S., Gilchrist, L. S., Lee, J. Y., Westlake, F., & Baker, A. (2018) · Rehabilitation Oncology · doi:10.1097/01.reo.0000000000000097 · Cited by 8
Theis, K. A., Brady, T. J., Helmick, C. G., Murphy, L. B., & Barbour, K. E. (2019) · ACR Open Rheumatology · doi:10.1002/acr2.11050 · Cited by 8
Perez-Huerta, B. D., Díaz-Pulido, B., Pecos‐Martín, D., Beckwée, D., Lluch‐Girbés, E., Fernández-Matías, R., Rubio, M. J. B., & Gallego‐Izquierdo, T. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm9124113 · Cited by 8
“Furthermore, it seems that higher exercise adherence is associated with improved physical function in overweight and obese older adults with knee OA [22].”
BackgroundResultDholam, K. P., Sharma, M. R., Gurav, S. V., Singh, G. P., & Prabhash, K. (2021) · Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.oooo.2021.07.018 · Cited by 8
Gutiérrez-Coronado, J., López, L., Cardero‐Durán, M. D. L. Á., Cabello, M. A., Marhuenda, J. V. T., Hernández-Sánchez, S., Dueñas, L., Marqués‐Sulé, E., Morral, A., & Espejo-Antúnez, L. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20010744 · Cited by 7
“Each subject rated the intensity of perceived pain at maximum extensibility in the AKE test on a straigh horizontal line of 100 mm length, where 0 was no pain and 100 was maximum pain [22].”
MethodBruehl, S. P., Milne, G. L., Polkowski, G. G., Shinar, A. A., Anderson, S., Mishra, P., Larach, D. B., Martin, R., & Billings, F. T. (2023) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1093/pm/pnad120 · Cited by 7
Wilson, A. T., Pinette, J., Lyons, K. M., & Hanney, W. J. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0299481 · Cited by 7
Babiloni, A. H., Provost, C., Charlebois‐Plante, C., Koninck, B. P. D., Apinis-Deshaies, A., Beaumont, L. D., Lavigne, G. J., & Martel, M. O. (2024) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104576 · Cited by 9
Tumilty, S., Adhia, D. B., Rhodes, R., & Mani, R. (2017) · Physical Therapy Reviews · doi:10.1080/10833196.2017.1282073 · Cited by 7
Lindqvist, E. A., Ljungvall, H., Zetterberg, L., Zetterberg, H., Bring, A., Tesséus, C. D. B., & Åsenlöf, P. (2021) · Scandinavian Journal of Pain · doi:10.1515/sjpain-2020-0187 · Cited by 7
“conducting research on chronic pain [11], but also for tar-”
Clausen, M. B., Witten, A., Christensen, K. B., Zebis, M. K., Foverskov, M., Cools, A. M. J., Hölmich, P., & Thorborg, K. (2022) · Musculoskeletal Science and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102593 · Cited by 7
Butler, M. J., D’Angelo, S., Perrin, A., Rodillas, J., Miller, D., Arader, L., Chandereng, T., Cheung, Y. K., Shechter, A., & Davidson, K. W. (2023) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/45313 · Cited by 6
“Daily self-reported fatigue and pain ratings will be assessed via EMA using a measure adapted from the Numeric Pain Rating Scale [55].”
Rosenstein, B., Montpetit, C., Vaillancourt, N., Dover, G. C., Khalini-Mahani, N., Weiss, C., Papula, L. A., Melek, A., & Fortin, M. (2023) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12891-023-07034-0 · Cited by 7
“The NPR has excellent reliability and validity, and can be used to identify statistical and clinically significant changes in perceived pain [61, 71].”
BackgroundShah, S., Bantel, C., Ho, A., Kuehler, B. M., Childs, S., Towlerton, G., & Goodall, I. (2015) · Journal of Pain Research · doi:10.2147/jpr.s80829 · Cited by 7
Fiegl, S., Lahmann, C., O’Rourke, T., Probst, T., & Pieh, C. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01862 · Cited by 7
“The Numeric Rating Scale is an often used self-rating instrument to measure pain intensity in chronic pain patients with a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain) (Joos et al., 1991; Jensen et al., 1999).”
Peña, R. F., Calvo‐Lobo, C., Touche, R. L., & Fernández‐Carnero, J. (2020) · Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2019.04.012 · Cited by 8
Ramírez‐García, E., de la Torre, G. S. G., Reyes, E. J. R., Moreno-Tamayo, K. M., Espinel‐Bermúdez, M. C., & Sánchez‐García, S. (2021) · Clinical Interventions in Aging · doi:10.2147/cia.s320341 · Cited by 7
Jet-Induced Blood Release From Human Fingertips: A Single-Blind, Randomized, Crossover Trial
Xu, J., McKeage, J. W., Ruddy, B. P., Nielsen, P. M. F., & Taberner, A. J. (2021) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/19322968211053895 · Cited by 7
Vatandoost, S., Sheikhhoseini, R., Akhbari, B., Salavati, M., Pourahmadi, M., Farhang, M., & O’Sullivan, K. (2022) · Physiotherapy Theory and Practice · doi:10.1080/09593985.2022.2043497 · Cited by 7
López‐de‐Uralde‐Villanueva, I., Gil‐Martínez, A., Candelas-Fernández, P., Ares, J. D. A., Beltrán-Alacreu, H., & Touche, R. L. (2018) · Neurología (English Edition) · doi:10.1016/j.nrleng.2016.10.003 · Cited by 7
Cancela‐Cilleruelo, I., Rodríguez‐Jiménez, J., Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., Arendt‐Nielsen, L., & Arias‐Buría, J. L. (2023) · Physiotherapy Theory and Practice · doi:10.1080/09593985.2023.2264384 · Cited by 7
“A 10-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) (0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) was used to assess the current and the worst level of elbow pain experienced in the preceding week while at rest (Jensen, Turbner, Romano, and Fisher, 1999).”
The Impact of Pain on the Quality of Life of People with Multiple Sclerosis:
Douglas, C., Wollin, J. A., & Windsor, C. A. (2009) · International Journal of MS Care · doi:10.7224/1537-2073-11.3.127 · Cited by 7
Boucher, B., & Smith-Young, B. (2017) · Physical Therapy in Sport · doi:10.1016/j.ptsp.2017.03.002 · Cited by 7
Adding Physical Impairment to Risk Stratification Improved Outcome Prediction in Low Back Pain
Beneciuk, J. M., & George, S. Z. (2020) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/pzaa179 · Cited by 7
Resta, T., Frenette, S., Rizk, A., & Fortin, M. (2022) · The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/jsc.0000000000004328 · Cited by 7
Assessment of manual dysfunction in occupationally active women with carpal tunnel syndrome
Wolny, T., Linek, P., & Saulicz, E. (2019) · International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health · doi:10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01263 · Cited by 7
Psychological and Behavioral Assessment
Seng, E. K., Kerns, R. D., & Heapy, A. A. (2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-08340-9.00016-5 · Cited by 7
Biopsychosocial contributors to irritability in individuals with shoulder or low back pain
Wilson, A. T., Hanney, W. J., Richardson, R. M., Klausner, S. H., & Bialosky, J. E. (2023) · Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy · doi:10.1080/10669817.2023.2294679 · Cited by 6
“Pain intensity was measured with a 101-point numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) where 0=no pain and 100=worst pain imaginable [28,29].”
The Effect of Physical Therapy on Somatosensory Tinnitus
Yu, H., Gong, J., Hong, G.-W., Zhou, R., Fu, X.-P., Fan, T., Zheng, Y., Peng, Y., Li, J., & Wang, Y. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm13123496 · Cited by 6
“The numerical pain rating scale (NPRS: 0 = no pain, 10 = maximum pain) was used to assess the intensity of somatic spasm pain [41].”
MethodAraya‐Quintanilla, F., Álvarez‐Bueno, C., Cavero‐Redondo, I., Ramírez‐Vélez, R., Sepúlveda‐Loyola, W., & Gutiérrez‐Espinoza, H. (2024) · British Journal of Pain · doi:10.1177/20494637241293760 · Cited by 7
“20,21 A previous study showed that a decrease of 2.0 points in the NPRS could be considered a minimal clinically important difference.”
InfluentialBell, T. R., Elman, J. A., Gustavson, D. E., Lyons, M. J., Fennema‐Notestine, C., Williams, M. E., Panizzon, M. S., Pearce, R. C., Reynolds, C. A., Sanderson‐Cimino, M. E., et al. (2025) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617725101057 · Cited by 6
“…high internal consistency ( α range: .88 – .91) and strong correlations with comprehensive pain scales like the Brief Pain Inventory and McGill Pain Questionnaire ( r range: .76 – .79), supporting their construct validity (Gandek et al., 2004; Jensen et al., 1999; Ware & Sherbourne, 1992).”
Exploring the Underlying Mechanisms of Action of Dry Needling
Meulemeester, K. D., Calders, P., & Cagnie, B. (2021) · American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/phm.0000000000001732 · Cited by 6
“Subjects had to score their neck pain at that moment on an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain).(28) Pain scores were also asked by text messages 1, 2, and 7 days after treatment.”
MethodButler, M. J., D’Angelo, S., Ahn, H., Chandereng, T., Miller, D., Perrin, A., Romain, A.-M. N., Scatoni, A., Friel, C. P., Cheung, Y. K., et al. (2023) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/45510 · Cited by 6
“Symptoms of fatigue were also assessed via EMA using a measure adapted from the Numeric Pain Rating Scale [44].”
MethodValenzuela-Rios, C., Arias‐Buría, J. L., Rodríguez‐Jiménez, J., Palacios‐Ceña, M., & Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm13113171 · Cited by 6
“In this case, between-group mean change scores, but not their 95% confidence intervals, slightly surpassed the MCID of 1.1 points for shoulder pain [26], supporting that the clinical relevance of PENS is small with the current dosage.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPacho-Hernández, J. C., Fernández-Palacios, F. G., Tejera-Alonso, Á., Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., Varol, U., Valera‐Calero, J. A., Fernández-Méndez, L. M., & Cigarán‐Méndez, M. (2024) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare12161678 · Cited by 6
“A 10-point (0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) Numerical Pain Rate Scale (NPRS) was used to evaluate the mean pain intensity [29].”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Jensen, M. P., Turner, J. A., Romano, J. M., & Fisher, L. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jensen, Mark P
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 157-162
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009568727
- Cited by
- 1,247
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 92 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 52
- FWCI
- 6.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- U.S. Public Health Service (R01 31683)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- chronic pain, pain intensity assessment, reliability statistics, validity, multidisciplinary pain management, longitudinal change detection
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Analgesics, Analysis of Variance, Chronic Disease, Counseling, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Occupational Therapy, Pain, Pain Measurement, Patient Care Team, Psychotherapy, Socioeconomic Factors, Time Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Physical Therapy Modalities, Pain Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review