The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative reliability and validity of chronic pain intensity measures.
Abstract
Reliable and valid measures of pain are essential for conducting research on chronic pain. The purpose of this longitudinal study was to compare the reliability and validity of several measures of pain intensity. One hundred twenty-three patients with chronic pain were administered telephone interview versions of 0-10 scales of current, worst, least and average pain, immediately prior to beginning a multidisciplinary treatment program. The measures were administered again to these subjects 2 weeks (n=108), 1 month (n=106) and 2 months (n=105) after the end of treatment. The validity (defined as ability to detect changes in pain intensity over the course of treatment up to the 2-month follow-up assessment) and reliability (defined as stability over time in the 2 months after treatment) of these four measures and of composite combinations of these measures were examined. Contrary to prediction, the composite measures did not show a statistically significant superiority to the individual ratings in terms of their ability to detect change in pain intensity from pre-treatment to various points after treatment. The composite scores did, however, show greater stability than did the individual ratings after treatment. The practical conclusions of this study are; (1), individual 0-10 pain intensity ratings have sufficient psychometric strengths to be used in chronic pain research, especially research that involves group comparison designs with relatively large sample sizes, but, (2), composites of 0-10 ratings may be more useful when maximal reliability is necessary, (e.g. in studies with relatively small sample sizes, or in clinical settings where monitoring of changes in pain intensity in individuals is needed).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The SOPA-32 is a well-validated 32-item measure with seven subscales that measure strength of endorsement of pain-related beliefs”
From An Online Self-help CBT Intervention for Chronic Lower Back Pain (2012) · cites this paper as [40]
Citations
Cites
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,882
Psychometric theory (2nd ed.).
Sitgreaves, R. (1979) · Contemporary Psychology · doi:10.1037/018882 · Cited by 14,384
Essentials of Psychological Testing
Rosner, B., & Cronbach, L. J. (1960) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1419921 · Cited by 4,524
The short-form McGill pain questionnaire
Melzack, R. (1987) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(87)91074-8 · Cited by 4,368
Serlin, R. C., Mendoza, T. R., Nakamura, Y., Edwards, K. R., & Cleeland, C. S. (1995) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(94)00178-h · Cited by 1,493
Price, D. D., Bush, F. M., Long, S., & Harkins, S. W. (1994) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(94)90097-3 · Cited by 1,174
Increasing the reliability and validity of pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients
Jensen, M. P., & McFarland, C. A. (1993) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(93)90148-i · Cited by 720
Self-citationThe use of pain scales in assessing the efficacy of analgesics in post-operative dental pain
Seymour, R. A. (1982) · European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf00605995 · Cited by 258
Max, M. B., Schafer, S. C., Culnane, M., Dubner, R. A., & Gracely, R. H. (1988) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1038/clpt.1988.44 · Cited by 247
The use of multiple-item scales for pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients
Jensen, M. P., Turner, L. R., Turner, J. A., & Romano, J. M. (1996) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(96)03078-3 · Cited by 227
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Salovey, 1993, Am Pain Soc J, 2, 184
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,001
Murillo, C., Martinez‐Valdes, E., Heneghan, N. R., Liew, B. X. W., Rushton, A. B., Sanderson, A. J. R., & Falla, D. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-52434-9 · Cited by 26
Dai, L., Yu, Y., Zhao, H., Zhang, X., Su, Y., Wang, X., Hu, S., Dai, H., Hu, C., & Ke, J. (2020) · Neuroradiology · doi:10.1007/s00234-020-02582-x · Cited by 26
“Interestingly, the VAS scores negatively correlated with lFCD in the OFG and cerebellum in our correlation analyses, indicating this adaptive mechanism may be more profound in patients with lower pain intensity.”
MethodPatient-Reported Outcomes and Long-Term Nonadherence to Aromatase Inhibitors
Hershman, D. L., Neugut, A. I., Moseley, A. B., Arnold, K. B., Gralow, J. R., Henry, N. L., Hillyer, G. C., Ramsey, S. D., & Unger, J. M. (2021) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djab022 · Cited by 26
“The BPI is a measure used to assess cancer pain (16).”
BackgroundCeballos‐Laita, L., Medrano-de-la-Fuente, R., Estébanez-de-Miguel, E., Moreno-Cerviño, J., Mingo-Gómez, M. T., Hernando-Garijo, I., & Jiménez‐del‐Barrio, S. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm10184260 · Cited by 27
Osteopathic treatment in patients with primary dysmenorrhoea: A randomised controlled trial
Schwerla, F., Wirthwein, P., Rütz, M., & Resch, K. (2014) · International journal of osteopathic medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ijosm.2014.04.003 · Cited by 26
Chiarotto, A., Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., Castaldo, M., Négrini, S., & Villafañe, J. H. (2013) · Hand · doi:10.1007/s11552-013-9537-2 · Cited by 26
Slater, H., Briggs, A. M., Bunzli, S., Davies, S., Smith, A. J., & Quintner, J. L. (2012) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/1471-2474-13-69 · Cited by 26
“Mean LBP intensities (current; past week; past month) were measured using an 11 point numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 to 10, with the left anchor 0 = no pain and the right anchor at 10=maximal imaginable pain [32].”
MethodChange in Suicidal Ideation After Interdisciplinary Treatment of Chronic Pain
Kowal, J., Wilson, K. G., Henderson, P. R., & McWilliams, L. A. (2013) · Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0000000000000003 · Cited by 26
Rodrigues‐de‐Souza, D. P., Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., Martín‐Vallejo, J., Blanco-Blanco, J. F., Gutiérrez, L. M., & Alburquerque‐Sendín, F. (2016) · Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy · doi:10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0175 · Cited by 26
Nielsen, A. M., Hestbæk, L., Vach, W., Kent, P. M., & Kongsted, A. (2017) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12891-017-1708-9 · Cited by 26
“These were: typical LBP and typical leg pain intensity during the preceding week measured by 0 to 10 Numeric Rating Scales [41, 42], the Danish 23 item version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ-23) used as a measure of pain-related disability that was proportionally recalculated to a 0–100 score wher…”
MethodFuensalida-Novo, S., Palacios-Ceña, M., Fernández-Muñoz, J. J., Castaldo, M., Wang, K.-L., Catena, A., Arendt-Nielsen, L., & Fernández-de-las-Peñas, C. (2017) · The Journal of Headache and Pain · doi:10.1186/s10194-017-0829-8 · Cited by 25
“On the diary, patients registered the frequency of headaches (days per week), the headache intensity on an 11points numerical pain rate scale [18] (NPRS; 0: no pain, 10: the maximum pain), and the duration of each headache attack (hours per day).”
BackgroundPedersini, P., Négrini, S., Cantero‐Téllez, R., Bishop, M. D., & Villafañe, J. H. (2019) · Journal of Hand Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.jht.2018.06.003 · Cited by 26
Evaluation of an interdisciplinary chronic pain program and predictors of readiness for change
Katz, L., Patterson, L. L., & Zacharias, R. (2019) · Canadian Journal of Pain · doi:10.1080/24740527.2019.1582296 · Cited by 27
“measuring patients’ “usual” and “least” amount of pain experienced in the past 2 weeks on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain).(21) This scale is a valid”
BackgroundWeeks, D. L., Whitney, A. A., Tindall, A. G., & Carter, G. T. (2015) · American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/phm.0000000000000285 · Cited by 42
“VASs for pain have been shown to be reliable and valid in chronic pain populations.(11,12) The VAS was administered at baseline, at the conclusion of training, and at the 3-mo follow-up assessment.”
MethodÁlvarez-Melcón, Á. C., Alcaide, R. V., Atín-Arratibel, M. D. L. Á., Melcón-Álvarez, A., & Montesinos, J. V. B. (2016) · Neurología · doi:10.1016/j.nrl.2016.06.008 · Cited by 25
Thong, I. S. K., Tan, G., Lee, T. Y. C., & Jensen, M. P. (2016) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1093/pm/pnw237 · Cited by 25
Shoe Orthotics for the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Cambron, J. A., Dexheimer, J. M., Duarte, M., & Freels, S. A. (2017) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2017.03.028 · Cited by 27
Castel, A., Cascón‐Pereira, R., & Pie, S. B. (2021) · Scandinavian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/sjop.12706 · Cited by 25
Megas, I.-F., Benzing, C., Winter, A., Raakow, J., Chopra, S., Pratschke, J., & Fikatas, P. (2022) · Hernia · doi:10.1007/s10029-022-02586-x · Cited by 25
“Our nursing staff and the attending physicians documented daily the postoperative pain at rest and at movement, using a 0–10 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scoring system (0: no pain, 10: the worst pain) [17, 18].”
Methoddos Santos, J. M., Lacerda, A. C. R., Ribeiro, V. G. C., Figueiredo, P. H. S., da Fonseca, S. F., Lage, V. K. D. S., Costa, H. S., Lima, V. P., Sañudo, B., Bernardo-Filho, M., et al. (2022) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology11060935 · Cited by 24
Pain Intensity and Its Association with Negative Mood States in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury
Rodrigues, D., Tran, Y., Wijesuriya, N. S., Guest, R., Middleton, J. W., & Craig, A. R. (2013) · Pain and Therapy · doi:10.1007/s40122-013-0017-8 · Cited by 25
“’’ Numerical pain rating scales of this variety have been shown to have acceptable test–retest reliability and validity in terms of associations with other pain measures and treatments [13, 14].”
BackgroundFargen, K. M., Hoh, B. L., & Mocco, J. (2011) · Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery · doi:10.1136/jnis.2010.003988 · Cited by 25
Riley, S. P., Cote, M. P., Leger, R. R., Swanson, B. T., Tafuto, V., Sizer, P. S., & Brismée, J. (2014) · Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy · doi:10.1179/2042618613y.0000000066 · Cited by 25
López‐López, A., González, J. L., Alonso-Fernández, M., Cuidad, N., & Matías‐Pompa, B. (2014) · International Psychogeriatrics · doi:10.1017/s1041610214000970 · Cited by 25
“PAIN INTENSITY Intensity was measured with a composite measure involving four dimensions (current, worst, least, and average pain), which have emerged as appropriate in small samples, where maximum reliability is required (Jensen et al., 1999).”
MethodCognitive function and its relationship to other psychosocial factors in lymphoma survivors
Krolak, D., Collins, B., Weiss, L., Harris, C. A., & van der Jagt, R. (2016) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-016-3480-z · Cited by 25
López‐de‐Uralde‐Villanueva, I., Sollano-Vallez, E., & del Corral, T. (2017) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2017.1337239 · Cited by 25
“Each participant from the chronic nonspecific neck pain group used the visual analogue scale [44,45] to report pain intensity.”
MethodThe Occupational Profile of Women with Fibromyalgia Syndrome
Pérez‐de‐Heredia‐Torres, M., Hoyas, E. H., Sánchez‐Camarero, C., Pérez‐Corrales, J., & Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C. (2015) · Occupational Therapy International · doi:10.1002/oti.1418 · Cited by 25
Vowles, K. E., Sowden, G., Hickman, J., & Ashworth, J. (2019) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2018.10.012 · Cited by 24
Kioskli, K., Scott, W., Winkley, K., Godfrey, E., & McCracken, L. M. (2020) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1093/pm/pnaa110 · Cited by 24
Fortin, M., Rye, M., Roussac, A., Montpetit, C., Burdick, J., Naghdi, N., Rosenstein, B., Bertrand, C., Macedo, L. G., Elliott, J. M., et al. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm12185920 · Cited by 24
“The scale is a reliable and valid method of detecting changes in perceived pain [59,60].”
MethodMueller, G., Palli, C., & Schumacher, P. (2018) · Pain Management Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.pmn.2018.09.002 · Cited by 24
Wells, N. M., Rollings, K. A., Ong, A. D., & Reid, M. C. (2019) · Frontiers in Built Environment · doi:10.3389/fbuil.2019.00142 · Cited by 24
“Participants were asked to rate the pain they experienced during the current day by choosing a number between 0 and 10 that “best describes your average level of pain today: A zero (0) indicated ‘no pain’ while a ten (10) meant ‘pain as intense as you can imagine”’ (Jensen et al., 1999, p. 159).”
BackgroundKhajuria, A., Charles, W. N., Prokopenko, M. I., Beswick, A. D., Pusic, A. L., Mosahebi, A., Dodwell, D. J., & Winters, Z. (2019) · BJS Open · doi:10.1002/bjs5.50245 · Cited by 24
Sturgeon, J. A., Langford, D. J., Tauben, D. J., & Sullivan, M. D. (2020) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2020.10.001 · Cited by 24
Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., Ortega‐Santiago, R., Ortiz-Gutiérrez, R. M., Caminero, A. B., Salom‐Moreno, J., & Arendt‐Nielsen, L. (2014) · Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0000000000000084 · Cited by 24
Flannelly, K. J., Oettinger, M., Galek, K., Braun-Storck, A., & Kreger, R. (2009) · Journal of Pastoral Care & Counseling Advancing theory and professional practice through scholarly and reflective publications · doi:10.1177/154230500906300109 · Cited by 24
“Zero to ten scales are fairly common in medical research on pain (e.g., Jensen et al., 1999; Kim & Buschmann, 2006; Manworren & Hynan, 2003) and psychological distress (Dabrowski et al. 2007; Hoffman et al., 2004; Jacobsen et al., 2005), and we have used them successfully to have hospital…”
MethodLópez‐de‐Uralde‐Villanueva, I. (2016) · Pain Physician · doi:10.36076/ppj/2016.19.77 · Cited by 24
Craig, A. R., Guest, R., Tran, Y., & Middleton, J. W. (2017) · Spinal Cord · doi:10.1038/sc.2017.41 · Cited by 24
Meulemeester, K. D., Calders, P., Dewitte, V., Barbe, T., Danneels, L. A., & Cagnie, B. J. (2017) · American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/phm.0000000000000761 · Cited by 24
“Subjects were asked to score their pain on a 10-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain) before, immediately after, and 10 minutes after treatment.(35) Based on the elicitation of LTRs, muscles of the subjects were post hoc divided into two groups for statistical analysis: muscles with and without LTRs.”
MethodÁlvarez-Melcón, Á. C., Alcaide, R. V., Atín-Arratibel, M. D. L. Á., Melcón-Álvarez, A., & Montesinos, J. V. B. (2018) · Neurología (English Edition) · doi:10.1016/j.nrleng.2016.06.007 · Cited by 24
Wollin, J. A., Douglas, C., & Windsor, C. A. (2008) · Griffith Research Online · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.03.022 · Cited by 24
De-la-Llave-Rincón, A. I., Alonso‐Blanco, C., Crujera, A. G., Ambite‐Quesada, S., Svensson, P. J., & Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C. (2012) · Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.10.008 · Cited by 24
Cancer pain: an update of pharmacological approaches in pain therapy
Gralow, I. (2002) · Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00001503-200210000-00014 · Cited by 24
Yan, Z., Wu, Y., Liu, M., Wang, X., Wang, J., Wang, Z., Wu, S., & Luan, X. (2023) · Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research · doi:10.1186/s13018-023-03881-8 · Cited by 23
“Pain degree was assessed by an 11-point numerical rating scale, which could be divided into no (0), mild (1–3), moderate (4–6), and severe pain (7–10) [18].”
MethodLinari-Melfi, M., Cantarero‐Villanueva, I., Fernández‐Lao, C., Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., Guisado-Barrilao, R., & Arroyo‐Morales, M. (2011) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/1471-2474-12-268 · Cited by 23
“The NPRS has been demonstrated to be a reliable and valid instrument to assess pain intensity [13].”
BackgroundHahne, A. J., Ford, J. J., Hinman, R. S., Richards, M. C., Surkitt, L. D., Chan, A. Y. P., Slater, S. L., & Taylor, N. F. (2016) · The Spine Journal · doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2016.10.004 · Cited by 26
Effects of High - Intensity Laser in Treatment of Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain
Gocevska, M., Nikolikj-Dimitrova, E., & Savevska, C. G. (2019) · Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences · doi:10.3889/oamjms.2019.117 · Cited by 23
Rasmussen, G. H. F., Kristiansen, M. V., Arroyo‐Morales, M., Voigt, M., & Madeleine, P. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0234118 · Cited by 25
Fortin, M., Rye, M., Roussac, A., Naghdi, N., Macedo, L. G., Dover, G. C., Elliott, J. M., DeMont, R. G., Weber, M. H., & Pepin, V. (2021) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12891-021-04346-x · Cited by 23
Scascighini, L., Litschi, M., Walti, M., & Sprott, H. (2011) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01085.x · Cited by 23
Konitzer, L. N., Gill, N. W., & Koppenhaver, S. L. (2011) · Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2011.3685 · Cited by 23
De-la-Llave-Rincón, A. I., Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., Pérez‐de‐Heredia‐Torres, M., Martínez-Pérez, A., Valenza, M. C., & Pareja, J. A. (2011) · American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/phm.0b013e31821a7170 · Cited by 23
Pain Location and Functioning in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury
Miró, J., Gertz, K. J., Carter, G. T., & Jensen, M. P. (2014) · PM&R · doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.01.010 · Cited by 23
Bissolotti, L., Villafañe, J. H., Gaffurini, P., Orizio, C., Valdes, K. A., & Négrini, S. (2016) · Journal of Physical Therapy Science · doi:10.1589/jpts.28.769 · Cited by 23
Beltrán-Alacreu, H., López‐de‐Uralde‐Villanueva, I., Calvo‐Lobo, C., Touche, R. L., Cano‐de‐la‐Cuerda, R., Gil‐Martínez, A., Ayuso, D. F., & Fernández‐Carnero, J. (2018) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s162702 · Cited by 26
“The patient was asked for pain intensity by marking the VAS with a perpendicular line (in that it is a reliable and valid measure of pain).(47,48)”
MethodApplying Centrality of Event to Persistent Pain: A Preliminary View
Perri, L. M., & Keefe, F. J. (2007) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2007.10.019 · Cited by 23
Waugh, E. J., Jaglal, S. B., & Davis, A. M. (2004) · Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2004.34.12.770 · Cited by 23
Ribeiro, I. L., Camargo, P. R., Alburquerque‐Sendín, F., Madeleine, P., Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., & Salvini, T. F. (2015) · Manual Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.math.2015.09.007 · Cited by 23
López‐de‐Uralde‐Villanueva, I., Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., Cleland, J. A., Cook, C. E., De-la-Llave-Rincón, A. I., Valera‐Calero, J. A., & Plaza‐Manzano, G. (2023) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2023.07.018 · Cited by 22
Hajhosseini, B., Chiou, G. J., Dori, G., Fukaya, E., Chandra, V., Meyer, S., & Gurtner, G. C. (2019) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1111/wrr.12764 · Cited by 22
“However, previous research in the pain literature has found the NRS 11-point numeric scale to be sufficient as a psychometric measure of pain levels.(17) To further minimize the influence of the variability of pain scores experienced by the study population, all statistical analyses used to evaluate patients’ pain lev…”
Postoperative Pain after Treatment Using the GentleWave System: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Grigsby, D., Ordinola‐Zapata, R., McClanahan, S. B., & Fok, A. S. L. (2020) · Journal of Endodontics · doi:10.1016/j.joen.2020.04.004 · Cited by 22
“Although the visual analog scale (VAS) is one of the most widely used tools to survey the severity and relief of pain, the NRS is regarded as one of the best single-item methods available to estimate the intensity of pain (17, 18).”
Touche, R. L., Pardo-Montero, J., Cuenca‐Martínez, F., Visscher, C. M., Paris‐Alemany, A., & López‐de‐Uralde‐Villanueva, I. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm9092831 · Cited by 22
Law, E. F., Zhou, C., Seung, F., Perry, F., & Palermo, T. M. (2021) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002290 · Cited by 22
Effectiveness of a Multimodal Treatment Program for Somatoform Pain Disorder
Pieh, C., Neumeier, S., Loew, T. H., Altmeppen, J., Angerer, M., Busch, V., & Lahmann, C. (2013) · Pain Practice · doi:10.1111/papr.12144 · Cited by 21
“numeric scale, scored 0 (no pain) through 10 (worst possible pain) to rate minimum, average, and maximum pain within the past 4 weeks.(18,19) The NRS is a valid and reliable method of”
MethodSelfe, T. K., Bourguignon, C. M., & Taylor, A. G. (2008) · The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine · doi:10.1089/acm.2008.0305 · Cited by 24
Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., Ambite‐Quesada, S., Rivas‐Martínez, I., Ortega‐Santiago, R., De-la-Llave-Rincón, A. I., Fernández-Mayoralas, D. M., & Pareja, J. A. (2011) · Pediatric Research · doi:10.1203/pdr.0b013e318229448a · Cited by 22
Clausen, M. B., Bandholm, T., Rathleff, M. S., Christensen, K. B., Zebis, M. K., Graven‐Nielsen, T., Hölmich, P., & Thorborg, K. (2018) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-018-2509-7 · Cited by 24
Racine, M., Jensen, M. P., Harth, M., Morley-Forster, P., & Nielson, W. R. (2018) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2018.09.013 · Cited by 22
Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., De-la-Llave-Rincón, A. I., Cescon, C., Barbero, M., Arias‐Buría, J. L., & Falla, D. (2019) · Pain Practice · doi:10.1111/papr.12788 · Cited by 23
“patient’s mean intensity of hand pain and the worst level of pain experienced in the preceding week.(28) Secondary outcomes included 2 subscales (functional status and severity) of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire.”
BackgroundePHoRt: Towards a Reference Architecture for Tele-Rehabilitation Systems
Pérez-Medina, J.-L., Jimenes-Vargas, K., Leconte, L., Villarreal-Narvaez, S., Rybarczyk, Y. P., & Vanderdonckt, J. M. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2927461 · Cited by 24
“to be used in the investigation of chronic pain [18].”
BackgroundLewis, J. S., Kellett, S., McCullough, R., Tapper, A., Tyler, C., Viner, M., & Palmer, S. (2019) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1093/pm/pnz176 · Cited by 23
“A numerical rating scale (NRS) is a widely used, valid, and reliable scale to measure pain intensity and has been shown to have high compliance rates in chronic pain populations [30,31].”
MethodSchröder, K., Öberg, B. E., Enthoven, P., Hedevik, H., Fors, M., & Abbott, A. D. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm10061230 · Cited by 25
“Secondary Outcome Measures Secondary outcomes were within group NRS-LBP and ODI longitudinal changes from baseline to 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up and mean differences between the control and intervention groups regarding change from baseline to 6 and 12 months follow-up.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCognitive‐behavioural group treatment with hypnosis: a randomized pilot trail in fibromyalgia
Castel, A., Salvat, M., Sala, J., & Rull, M. (2009) · Contemporary Hypnosis · doi:10.1002/ch.372 · Cited by 32
Ríos‐León, M., Taylor, J., Segura‐Fragoso, A., & Barriga-Martín, A. (2023) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1093/pm/pnad165 · Cited by 21
Darnall, B. D., Aickin, M. G., & Zwickey, H. L. (2010) · Gender Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.genm.2010.06.003 · Cited by 21
Tornero-Caballero, M. C., Salom‐Moreno, J., Cigarán‐Méndez, M., Morales-Cabezas, M., Madeleine, P., & Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C. (2016) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1093/pm/pnw090 · Cited by 21
Clinical Characteristics of Mixed Arteriovenous Leg Ulcers
Marin, J., & Woo, K. Y. (2017) · Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing · doi:10.1097/won.0000000000000294 · Cited by 21
Cigarán‐Méndez, M., Jiménez‐Antona, C., Parás‐Bravo, P., Fuensalida‐Novo, S., Rodríguez‐Jiménez, J., & Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C. (2019) · Pain Practice · doi:10.1111/papr.12775 · Cited by 21
Galor, A., Patel, S., Small, L. R., Rodriguez, A., Venincasa, M. J., Valido, S. E., Feuer, W. J., Levitt, R. C., Sarantopoulos, C. D., & Felix, E. R. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm8091355 · Cited by 21
“Ocular pain: Three ocular pain questionnaires were administered, each targeting different aspects of pain: (a) Numerical rating scale (NRS) of ocular pain intensity (range 0–10; “no pain” to “most intense pain imaginable”) over a one week recall period (average eye pain during the past week, and worst eye pain during…”
MethodAlschuler, K. N., & Otis, J. D. (2012) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1002/j.1532-2149.2012.00180.x · Cited by 21
“NRS has been validated as a good measure of persons with chronic pain, including in comparison to other pain intensity measures (Jensen et al., 1999).”
BackgroundSelf‐Reported Issues With Driving in Patients With Chronic Pain
Fan, A., Wilson, K. G., Acharya, M., Cranney, A., Buenger, U., & Marshall, S. (2012) · PM&R · doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.10.008 · Cited by 21
“● Pain intensity rated on a numerical rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (as intense as you can imagine) [30].”
BackgroundMethodNieto, R., Miró, J., Huguet, A., & Saldaña, C. (2010) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.3109/09638288.2010.491576 · Cited by 23
“Numerical rating scales have shown a strong association with other measures of pain intensity and stability over time, thus demonstrating their validity and reliability as measures of pain intensity [38].”
BackgroundChanges in Perceived Pain Severity during Interdisciplinary Treatment for Chronic Pain
Kowal, J., Wilson, K. G., Geck, C., Henderson, P. R., & D’Eon, J. L. (2011) · Pain Research and Management · doi:10.1155/2011/817816 · Cited by 21
Fernández-Muñóz, J. J., Palacios‐Ceña, M., Cigarán‐Méndez, M., Ortega‐Santiago, R., De-la-Llave-Rincón, A. I., Salom‐Moreno, J., & Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C. (2015) · Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0000000000000241 · Cited by 21
Esteve, R., Bendayan, R., López-Martínez, A. E., & Ramírez‐Maestre, C. (2017) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1093/pm/pnx053 · Cited by 21
Riley, S. P., Tafuto, V., Cote, M. P., Brismée, J., Wright, A. A., & Cook, C. E. (2018) · Physiotherapy Theory and Practice · doi:10.1080/09593985.2018.1453004 · Cited by 21
Scaccabarozzi, G., Amodio, E., Pellegrini, G., Limonta, F., Aprile, P. L., Lovaglio, P. G., Peruselli, C., Crippa, M., & Arianna Working Group (2018) · Journal of Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1089/jpm.2017.0404 · Cited by 21
“For pain evaluation, Numeric Pain Rating Scale 15 was used, with values of 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain level).”
Jiménez‐del‐Barrio, S., Estébanez-de-Miguel, E., Bueno-Gracía, E., Haddad-Garay, M., Moreno, J. M. T., & Hidalgo-García, C. (2018) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1177/0269215518787316 · Cited by 21
Ortega‐Santiago, R., González-Aguado, Á. J., Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., Cleland, J. A., De-la-Llave-Rincón, A. I., Kobylarz, M. D., & Plaza‐Manzano, G. (2019) · Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.bjpt.2019.05.008 · Cited by 21
Post-needling soreness and trigger point dry needling for hemiplegic shoulder pain following stroke
Mendigutía-Gómez, A., Quintana-García, M. T., Martín-Sevilla, M., de Lorenzo-Barrientos, D., Rodríguez‐Jiménez, J., Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., & Arias‐Buría, J. L. (2020) · Acupuncture in Medicine · doi:10.1177/0964528419882941 · Cited by 21
Clifford, A. M., Dillon, S., Hartigan, K., O’Leary, H., & Constantinou, M. (2020) · Gait & Posture · doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.09.010 · Cited by 21
“The NRS has been validated for a number of chronic musculoskeletal disorders [26], and has been used among people with anterior knee pain in various research settings [24].”
BackgroundChotai, S., Park, P., Sielatycki, J. A., Sivaganesan, A., Kay, H. F., Wick, J. B., McGirt, M. J., & Devin, C. J. (2016) · European Spine Journal · doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4835-3 · Cited by 21
“Validated PROs, including: neck disability index (ODI) [33], EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) [34], short-form-12 item health survey (SF-12), physical component score (PCS) and mental component score (MCS) [35], and numeric-rating scale pain scores (NRS) for neck pain (NP) and arm pain (AP) [36] were captured.”
Field, J. R., Newell, D., & McCarthy, P. W. (2010) · Chiropractic & Manual Therapies · doi:10.1186/1746-1340-18-21 · Cited by 21
“It has been described as having a Cronbach’s a of 0.82 and intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.8 [ 56 ].”
InfluentialWykes, C. B., Clark, T. J., Chakravati, S., Mann, C. H., & Gupta, J. K. (2005) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.08.008 · Cited by 21
Gralow, I., Crede, S., & Schneider, E. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-12819-6_6 · Cited by 21
Cabello, M. A., Pérez‐Mármol, J. M., Barrios-Quinta, C. J., Matarán-Peñarrocha, G. A., Castro‐Sánchez, A. M., & De-la-Cruz-Torres, B. (2019) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1177/0269215519844554 · Cited by 20
Aprile, I. G., Germanotta, M., Cruciani, A., Pecchioli, C., Loreti, S., Papadopoulou, D., Montesano, A., Galeri, S., Diverio, M., Falsini, C., et al. (2020) · International Journal of Stroke · doi:10.1177/1747493020937192 · Cited by 20
Impact of symptom burden on work performance status in Spanish women diagnosed with endometriosis
Mundo-López, A., Hernández, O. O., Lozano‐Lozano, M., San-Sebastián, A. P., Fernández‐Lao, C., Galiano‐Castillo, N., Cantarero‐Villanueva, I., Arroyo‐Morales, M., & Artacho‐Cordón, F. (2021) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.04.008 · Cited by 20
Ortego, G., Lluch, E., Herrero, P., Boudreau, S. A., & Doménech‐García, V. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm11051346 · Cited by 20
“The VAS is a reliable and valid tool for measuring pain [40,41].”
MethodSalomon, M., Pastore, C., Maselli, F., Bari, M. D., Pellegrino, R., & Brindisino, F. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19159715 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Jensen, M. P., Turner, J. A., Romano, J. M., & Fisher, L. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jensen, Mark P
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 157-162
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009568727
- Cited by
- 1,247
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 92 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 52
- FWCI
- 6.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- U.S. Public Health Service (R01 31683)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- chronic pain, pain intensity assessment, reliability statistics, validity, multidisciplinary pain management, longitudinal change detection
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Analgesics, Analysis of Variance, Chronic Disease, Counseling, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Occupational Therapy, Pain, Pain Measurement, Patient Care Team, Psychotherapy, Socioeconomic Factors, Time Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Physical Therapy Modalities, Pain Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review