The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative reliability and validity of chronic pain intensity measures.
Abstract
Reliable and valid measures of pain are essential for conducting research on chronic pain. The purpose of this longitudinal study was to compare the reliability and validity of several measures of pain intensity. One hundred twenty-three patients with chronic pain were administered telephone interview versions of 0-10 scales of current, worst, least and average pain, immediately prior to beginning a multidisciplinary treatment program. The measures were administered again to these subjects 2 weeks (n=108), 1 month (n=106) and 2 months (n=105) after the end of treatment. The validity (defined as ability to detect changes in pain intensity over the course of treatment up to the 2-month follow-up assessment) and reliability (defined as stability over time in the 2 months after treatment) of these four measures and of composite combinations of these measures were examined. Contrary to prediction, the composite measures did not show a statistically significant superiority to the individual ratings in terms of their ability to detect change in pain intensity from pre-treatment to various points after treatment. The composite scores did, however, show greater stability than did the individual ratings after treatment. The practical conclusions of this study are; (1), individual 0-10 pain intensity ratings have sufficient psychometric strengths to be used in chronic pain research, especially research that involves group comparison designs with relatively large sample sizes, but, (2), composites of 0-10 ratings may be more useful when maximal reliability is necessary, (e.g. in studies with relatively small sample sizes, or in clinical settings where monitoring of changes in pain intensity in individuals is needed).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The SOPA-32 is a well-validated 32-item measure with seven subscales that measure strength of endorsement of pain-related beliefs”
From An Online Self-help CBT Intervention for Chronic Lower Back Pain (2012) · cites this paper as [40]
Citations
Cites
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,882
Psychometric theory (2nd ed.).
Sitgreaves, R. (1979) · Contemporary Psychology · doi:10.1037/018882 · Cited by 14,384
Essentials of Psychological Testing
Rosner, B., & Cronbach, L. J. (1960) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1419921 · Cited by 4,524
The short-form McGill pain questionnaire
Melzack, R. (1987) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(87)91074-8 · Cited by 4,368
Serlin, R. C., Mendoza, T. R., Nakamura, Y., Edwards, K. R., & Cleeland, C. S. (1995) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(94)00178-h · Cited by 1,493
Price, D. D., Bush, F. M., Long, S., & Harkins, S. W. (1994) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(94)90097-3 · Cited by 1,174
Increasing the reliability and validity of pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients
Jensen, M. P., & McFarland, C. A. (1993) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(93)90148-i · Cited by 720
Self-citationThe use of pain scales in assessing the efficacy of analgesics in post-operative dental pain
Seymour, R. A. (1982) · European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf00605995 · Cited by 258
Max, M. B., Schafer, S. C., Culnane, M., Dubner, R. A., & Gracely, R. H. (1988) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1038/clpt.1988.44 · Cited by 247
The use of multiple-item scales for pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients
Jensen, M. P., Turner, L. R., Turner, J. A., & Romano, J. M. (1996) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(96)03078-3 · Cited by 227
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Salovey, 1993, Am Pain Soc J, 2, 184
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,001
Guzick, D. S., Huang, L., Broadman, B. A., Nealon, M., & Hornstein, M. D. (2011) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.027 · Cited by 120
Basch, E., Pugh, S. L., Dueck, A. C., Mitchell, S. A., Berk, L. B., Fogh, S. E., Rogak, L. J., Gatewood, M. L., Reeve, B. B., Mendoza, T. R., et al. (2017) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.02.002 · Cited by 117
Fernández‐Carnero, J., Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., De-la-Llave-Rincón, A. I., Ge, H., & Arendt‐Nielsen, L. (2007) · Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0b013e31803b3785 · Cited by 117
Breckenridge, J. N., & Clark, J. D. (2003) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/s1526-5900(03)00638-2 · Cited by 114
Upton, H. D., Ludbrook, G., Wing, A., & SLEIGH, J. W. (2017) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000001984 · Cited by 112
A Comparison of Three Self-Report Pain Scales in Adults With Acute Pain
Bahreini, M., Jalili, M., & Moradi‐Lakeh, M. (2014) · Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.07.039 · Cited by 113
Gender differences in outcomes of a multimodal pain management program
Pieh, C., Altmeppen, J., Neumeier, S., Loew, T., Angerer, M., & Lahmann, C. (2012) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2011.10.016 · Cited by 110
“The NRS is a valid and reliable method of measuring pain [22] that is recommended for use in patients with chronic pain [20,24].”
Hagerty, S. L., Hutchison, K. E., Lowry, C. A., & Bryan, A. D. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0229204 · Cited by 118
Cognitions, Coping, and Social Environment Predict Adjustment to Pain in Spinal Cord Injury
Raichle, K. A., Hanley, M., Jensen, M. P., & Cardenas, D. D. (2007) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2007.05.006 · Cited by 111
Koppenhaver, S. L., Parent, É., Teyhen, D. S., Hébert, J. J., & Fritz, J. M. (2009) · Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2009.3088 · Cited by 110
Lentz, T. A., George, S. Z., Manickas-Hill, O., Malay, M., O’Donnell, J., Jayakumar, P., Jiranek, W. A., & Mather, R. C. “. (2020) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/corr.0000000000001520 · Cited by 110
“Pain intensity was assessed with a numerical rating scale ranging from 0 (“no pain”) to 10 (“worst pain imaginable”) [7, 12, 33].”
MethodFernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., Cuadrado, M. L., Arendt‐Nielsen, L., Ge, H., & Pareja, J. A. (2007) · Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0b013e31803b3770 · Cited by 109
Lentz, T. A., Barabas, J. A., Day, T., Bishop, M. D., & George, S. Z. (2009) · Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2009.2879 · Cited by 119
Efficacy of a Self-Management Group Intervention for Elderly Persons With Chronic Pain
Ersek, M. T., Turner, J. A., McCurry, S. M., Gibbons, L. E., & Kraybill, B. M. (2003) · Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/00002508-200305000-00003 · Cited by 107
“Such composite pain ratings have been shown to be more reliable than single pain ratings and are sensitive to change over the course of treatment.(45) A pain-related activity interference score was calculated by averaging study participants’ ratings of pain interference with ability to take part in daily, recreational…”
MethodNaughton, F., Ashworth, P., & Skevington, S. M. (2006) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2006.08.019 · Cited by 107
“Composite scores have better reliability and stability than individual pain scale ratings (Jensen et al., 1999a,b).”
BackgroundMethodFactors associated with acute postoperative pain following breast reconstruction
Kulkarni, A. R., Pusic, A. L., Hamill, J. B., Kim, H. M., Qi, J., Wilkins, E. G., & Roth, R. S. (2016) · JPRAS Open · doi:10.1016/j.jpra.2016.08.005 · Cited by 106
Cortical and white matter alterations in patients with neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury
Yoon, E. J., Kim, Y. K., Shin, H., Lee, Y., & Kim, S. E. (2013) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2013.10.007 · Cited by 108
“The average pain intensity was measured using the 11-point NRS system, with “0” indicating “no pain” and “10” indicating “the most intense imaginable pain” (Jensen et al., 1999).”
Jensen, M. P., Barber, J., Romano, J. M., Molton, I. R., Raichle, K. A., Osborne, T. L., Engel, J. M., Stoelb, B. L., Kraft, G. H., & Patterson, D. R. (2009) · International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis · doi:10.1080/00207140802665476 · Cited by 107
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Lessen Neuropathic Pain After Spinal Cord Injury
Yoon, E. J., Kim, Y. K., Kim, H., Kim, S. E., Lee, Y., & Shin, H. (2013) · Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · doi:10.1177/1545968313507632 · Cited by 109
Psychological predictors of recovery from low back pain: a prospective study
George, S. Z., & Beneciuk, J. M. (2015) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12891-015-0509-2 · Cited by 113
“Pain intensity was measured with a numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) ranging from “0” (no pain) to “10” (worst pain imaginable) [11-13].”
MethodFactors associated with prognosis of lateral epicondylitis after 8 weeks of physical therapy
Waugh, E. J., Jaglal, S. B., Davis, A. M., TOMLINSON, G. A., & Verrier, M. C. (2004) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00480-5 · Cited by 105
Responsiveness of Pain and Disability Measures for Chronic Whiplash
Stewart, M., Maher, C. G., Refshauge, K. M., Bogduk, N., & Nicholas, M. K. (2007) · Spine · doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000256380.71056.6d · Cited by 104
“, 1 week) rather than at the point in time when they completed the measure.(23,35,36) In the Jensen et al study,(36) the patient judged his or her pain over the past 2 weeks; whereas in the Bolton study,(35) the time frame was the past week and in the Scrimshaw study 24 hours.”
BackgroundFernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., Ge, H., Arendt‐Nielsen, L., Cuadrado, M. L., & Pareja, J. A. (2007) · Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0b013e318153496a · Cited by 104
“The intensity of the local pain, defined as pain located around the compression site, and referred pain, defined as pain located outside the local pain area evoked by TrP manual palpation, was scored on a 10-cm horizontal VAS (range: 0=no pain, to 10=maximum pain).(15) The quality of the evoked referred pain was asses…”
MethodRamírez‐Maestre, C., & Esteve, R. (2014) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2014.02.006 · Cited by 107
Pain in Youths With Neuromuscular Disease
Engel, J. M., Kartin, D., Carter, G. T., Jensen, M. P., & Jaffe, K. M. (2009) · American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine® · doi:10.1177/1049909109346165 · Cited by 103
“The BPI is a valid and reliable instrument designed to measure pain interference.(25-27) Degree of interference with daily activities and participation was measured for the primary pain location.”
MethodInfluentialEhde, D. M., & Jensen, M. P. (2004) · Rehabilitation Psychology · doi:10.1037/0090-5550.49.3.254 · Cited by 102
Riddle, D. L., Keefe, F. J., Ang, D. C., Slover, J., Jensen, M. P., Bair, M. J., Kroenke, K., Perera, R. A., Reed, S. D., McKee, D., et al. (2019) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/jbjs.18.00621 · Cited by 101
Hershman, D. L., Unger, J. M., Crew, K. D., Awad, D., Dakhil, S. R., Gralow, J. R., Greenlee, H., Lew, D. L., Minasian, L. M., Till, C., et al. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2014.59.5595 · Cited by 101
“Numeric rating scales such as the BPI are among the most common, valid, and reliable measures used to assess cancer pain.(22) The BPI-SF is a 14-item questionnaire that asks patients to rate pain over the prior week and the degree to which it interfered with activities on a 0-to-10 scale, where higher scores indicate…”
MethodTéllez-García, M., De-la-Llave-Rincón, A. I., Salom‐Moreno, J., Palacios‐Ceña, M., Ortega‐Santiago, R., & Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C. (2014) · Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies · doi:10.1016/j.jbmt.2014.11.012 · Cited by 100
“The MCID for the NPRS in patients with chronic LBP has been reported to be 2.5 points (Ostelo and de Vet, 2005).”
MethodInfluentialToro-Velasco, C., Arroyo‐Morales, M., Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., Cleland, J. A., & Barrero, F. J. (2009) · Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.08.011 · Cited by 99
“A 10-point NPRS (0 = no pain, 10 = maximum pain) was used to assess current pain status.(26) Furthermore, the Profile of Mood States (POMS) questionnaire was used to evaluate mood state of the patient.”
MethodMartínez-Segura, R., De-la-Llave-Rincón, A. I., Ortega‐Santiago, R., Cleland, J. A., & Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C. (2012) · Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.4151 · Cited by 99
Alburquerque‐Sendín, F., Camargo, P. R., Vieira, A., & Salvini, T. F. (2013) · Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0b013e3182652d65 · Cited by 98
Tighe, P. J., Riley, J. L., & Fillingim, R. B. (2014) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1111/pme.12498 · Cited by 100
Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., Bueno, Á., Ferrando, J., Elliott, J. M., Cuadrado, M. L., & Pareja, J. A. (2007) · Cephalalgia · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01293.x · Cited by 95
Vertical Dynamic Visual Acuity in Normal Subjects and Patients with Vestibular Hypofunction
Schubert, M. C., Herdman, S. J., & Tusa, R. J. (2002) · Otology & Neurotology · doi:10.1097/00129492-200205000-00025 · Cited by 94
De Meulemeester, K. E., Castelein, B., Coppieters, I., Barbe, T., Cools, A., & Cagnie, B. (2017) · Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.10.008 · Cited by 93
Iglesias-González, J. J., Muñoz-García, M. T., Rodrigues‐de‐Souza, D. P., Alburquerque‐Sendín, F., & Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C. (2013) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1111/pme.12224 · Cited by 93
Vowles, K. E., Sowden, G., & Ashworth, J. (2014) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2013.12.009 · Cited by 92
Clinically derived early postoperative pain trajectories differ by age, sex, and type of surgery
Tighe, P. J., Le-Wendling, L. T., Patel, A. G., Zou, B., & Fillingim, R. B. (2015) · Pain · doi:10.1097/01.j.pain.0000460352.07836.0d · Cited by 96
“The “snapshot” nature of this assessmentmethodmay limit its usefulness, bothmanaging daily pain and in determining optimal pain regimens for patients at a more systematic level.(7,8,19,20,22,23) Accurately characterizing the postoperative pain course, by characterizing temporal trends in pain scores, is important give…”
BackgroundFernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., Pérez‐de‐Heredia‐Torres, M., Molero‐Sánchez, A., & Miangolarra‐Page, J. C. (2007) · Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2007.2401 · Cited by 92
Price, C. J., Wells, E. A., Donovan, D. M., & Rue, T. (2012) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2011.09.016 · Cited by 90
George, S. Z., & Robinson, M. E. (2010) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2010.02.016 · Cited by 95
Depression and anxiety in colorectal cancer patients: Ties to pain, fatigue, and inflammation
Renna, M. E., Shrout, M. R., Madison, A. A., Alfano, C. M., Povoski, S. P., Lipari, A. M., Carson, W. E., Malarkey, W. B., & Kiecolt‐Glaser, J. K. (2022) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.5986 · Cited by 92
Touche, R. L., Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., Fernández‐Carnero, J., Angulo, S., Paris‐Alemany, A., & Arendt‐Nielsen, L. (2009) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2009.07.003 · Cited by 90
Fernández‐Lao, C., Cantarero‐Villanueva, I., Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., del Moral-Ávila, R., Arendt‐Nielsen, L., & Arroyo‐Morales, M. (2010) · Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0b013e3181f18c36 · Cited by 90
Frøkjær, J. B., Bouwense, S. A. W., Olesen, S. S., Lundager, F. H., Eskildsen, S. F., van Goor, H., Wilder‐Smith, O. H. G., & Drewes, A. M. (2011) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2011.11.024 · Cited by 89
Fernández-Lao, C., Cantarero-Villanueva, I., Fernández-de-las-Peñas, C., Del-Moral-Ávila, R., Menjón-Beltrán, S., & Arroyo-Morales, M. (2011) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.01027.x · Cited by 89
Mjøsund, H. L., Boyle, E., Kjær, P., Mieritz, R. M., Skallgård, T., & Kent, P. M. (2017) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12891-017-1489-1 · Cited by 89
“Participants with LBP had to have current or recurrent LBP. Current LBP was arbitrarily defined as experiencing an average pain of >2 on a 0–10 Numeric pain Rating Scale (NRS) over the past 3 weeks.”
MethodInfluentialUltrasound Assessment of Bilateral Longus Colli Muscles in Subjects with Chronic Bilateral Neck Pain
Javanshir, K., Rezasoltani, A., Bandpei, M. A. M., Amiri, M., Ortega‐Santiago, R., & Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C. (2010) · American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/phm.0b013e31820173e5 · Cited by 88
“A 10-cm visual analog scale (0, no pain, to 10, maximum pain) was used for assessment of neck pain intensity.(23) Subjects determined a point along”
MethodNeck pain and disability due to neck pain: what is the relation?
Fejer, R., & Hartvigsen, J. (2007) · European Spine Journal · doi:10.1007/s00586-007-0521-9 · Cited by 88
“Such a composite score maximizes the reliability and validity of pain assessment [12, 19–21] and thus, shows a greater stability which is especially important in clinical trials with relative small sample sizes or when monitoring changes over time [14, 20].”
BackgroundHayes, C. J., Bhandari, N. R., Kathe, N. J., & Payakachat, N. (2017) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare5020022 · Cited by 88
Crew, K. D., Capodice, J. L., Greenlee, H., Apollo, A., Jacobson, J. S., Raptis, G., Blozie, K., Sierra, A., & Hershman, D. L. (2007) · Journal of Cancer Survivorship · doi:10.1007/s11764-007-0034-x · Cited by 87
“Numeric rating scales such as the BPI are among the most common, valid, and reliable measures used to assess cancer pain severity, and are preferred by patients over visual analog scale measures [23].”
BackgroundWolny, T., Saulicz, E., Linek, P., Shacklock, M., & Myśliwiec, A. P. (2017) · Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.02.004 · Cited by 86
“Patients used a Numerical Pain Rating Scale (0 = no pain, 10 = maximum pain) to assess current hand pain and the worst pain experienced in the preceding week.(39) The pain in each hand was evaluated separately in patients with bilateral CTS.”
MethodMyofascial trigger points in the suboccipital muscles in episodic tension-type headache
Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., Alonso‐Blanco, C., Cuadrado, M. L., & Pareja, J. A. (2006) · Manual Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.math.2006.07.003 · Cited by 86
Chronic pain and the interpersonal theory of suicide.
Wilson, K. G., Kowal, J., Henderson, P. R., McWilliams, L. A., & Péloquin, K. (2013) · Rehabilitation Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0031390 · Cited by 86
Werneke, M. W., & Hart, D. L. (2004) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/84.3.243 · Cited by 86
Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., Palomeque-del-Cerro, L., Rodríguez‐Blanco, C., Gómez‐Conesa, A., & Miangolarra‐Page, J. C. (2007) · Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2007.03.007 · Cited by 85
Pardo, G. B., Pecos‐Martín, D., Gallego‐Izquierdo, T., Salom‐Moreno, J., Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., & Ortega‐Santiago, R. (2013) · Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.05.022 · Cited by 85
Jensen, M. P., Nielson, W. R., Turner, J. A., Romano, J. M., & Hill, M. L. (2004) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2004.06.003 · Cited by 83
“Responses to these four questions were averaged for a measure of pain severity (Jensen et al., 1999).”
BackgroundManual Physical Therapy Versus Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Parallel-Group Trial
Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., Ortega‐Santiago, R., De-la-Llave-Rincón, A. I., Martínez-Pérez, A., Díaz, H. F.-S., Martínez-Martín, J., Pareja, J. A., & Cuadrado, M. L. (2015) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2015.07.012 · Cited by 83
Frøkjær, J. B., Olesen, S. S., Gram, M., Yavarian, Y., Bouwense, S. A. W., Wilder‐Smith, O. H. G., & Drewes, A. M. (2011) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2010.236620 · Cited by 83
Clark, T. J., Middleton, L., Cooper, N. A., Diwakar, L., Denny, E., Smith, P., Gennard, L., Stobert, L., Roberts, T. E., Cheed, V., et al. (2015) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta19610 · Cited by 83
Kerns, R. D., Burns, J. W., Shulman, M., Jensen, M. P., Nielson, W. R., Czlapinski, R. A., Dallas, M. I., Chatkoff, D. K., Sellinger, J. J., Heapy, A. A., et al. (2013) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0034406 · Cited by 81
Guest, R., Tran, Y., Gopinath, B., Cameron, I. D., & Craig, A. R. (2018) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-018-0216-5 · Cited by 81
“Research shows numerical pain rating scales have good test–retest reliability and validity [36].”
BackgroundHanley, M. A., Raichle, K. A., Jensen, M. P., & Cardenas, D. D. (2008) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2008.04.008 · Cited by 81
Briggs, A. M., Jordan, J. M., O’Sullivan, P., Buchbinder, R., Burnett, A., Osborne, R. H., & Straker, L. M. (2011) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/1471-2474-12-161 · Cited by 81
Fernández-Pérez, A. M., Villaverde‐Gutiérrez, C., Mora-Sánchez, A., Alonso‐Blanco, C., Sterling, M. M., & Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C. (2012) · Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.4117 · Cited by 81
Hanley, M. A., Gutiérrez, A. I. M., Jensen, M. P., Cardenas, D. D., & Turner, J. A. (2006) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2005.09.011 · Cited by 81
“In addition, hese common terms may be useful in clinical settings hen health care providers and patients discuss pain.(1)”
BackgroundDelgado‐de‐la‐Serna, P., Plaza‐Manzano, G., Cleland, J., Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., Martín‐Casas, P., & Díaz‐Arribas, M. J. (2019) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1093/pm/pnz278 · Cited by 80
“Participants rated their intensity of TMD pain at rest on a numerical pain rating scale (NPRS; 0 1⁄4 no pain, 10 1⁄4 maximum pain) [20].”
MethodHassanein, T., Blei, A. T., Perry, W., Hilsabeck, R. C., Stange, J., Larsen, F. S., Brown, R. S., Caldwell, S. H., McGuire, B. M., Nevens, F., et al. (2009) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2009.160 · Cited by 80
Evaluation and assessment of cancer pain and cancer pain treatment
Caraceni, A. T. (2001) · Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.450903.x · Cited by 80
“The ability to detect changes induced by treatment is considered an important aspect of the validity of a pain measure (63).”
BackgroundSpecific and general therapeutic mechanisms in cognitive behavioral treatment of chronic pain
Burns, J. W., Nielson, W. R., Jensen, M. P., Heapy, A., Czlapinski, R., & Kerns, R. D. (2015) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0037208 · Cited by 77
Self-citationGeorge, S. Z., Beneciuk, J. M., Lentz, T. A., Wu, S. S., Dai, Y., Bialosky, J. E., & Zeppieri, G. (2018) · Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.7811 · Cited by 79
Koumantakis, G. Α., Winstanley, J. B., & Oldham, J. A. (2002) · Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2002.32.7.327 · Cited by 79
Garrigós-Pedrón, M., Touche, R. L., Navarro-Desentre, P., Gracia-Naya, M., & Segura‐Ortí, E. (2018) · Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache · doi:10.11607/ofph.1912 · Cited by 80
Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., Cuadrado, M. L., Gerwin, R. D., & Pareja, J. A. (2005) · Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain · doi:10.1111/j.1526-4610.2005.05140.x · Cited by 78
Graversen, C., Olesen, S. S., Olesen, A. E., Steimle, K., Farina, D., Wilder‐Smith, O. H. G., Bouwense, S. A. W., van Goor, H., & Drewes, A. M. (2011) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04104.x · Cited by 77
Introduction to the Hepatic Encephalopathy Scoring Algorithm (HESA)
Hassanein, T., Hilsabeck, R. C., & Perry, W. (2007) · Digestive Diseases and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s10620-007-9895-0 · Cited by 77
Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., Falla, D., Arendt‐Nielsen, L., & Farina, D. (2008) · Cephalalgia · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01584.x · Cited by 76
Castel, A., Cascón, R., Padrol, A., Sala, J., & Rull, M. (2012) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2011.11.005 · Cited by 79
Alonso‐Blanco, C., Fernández‐de‐las‐Peñas, C., Morales-Cabezas, M., Zarco-Moreno, P., Ge, H., & Flórez-García, M. T. (2011) · Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0b013e318210110a · Cited by 76
“An 11-point numerical point rate scale (0: no pain; 10: maximum pain) was used to assess the current level of pain and the worst and the lowest level of generalized pain experienced in the preceding week.(37) Participants were asked to complete the BDI-II, a 21-item self-report questionnaire that assesses affective, c…”
MethodMalignant bone pain: Pathophysiology and treatments
Ripamonti, C. I., & Fulfaro, F. (2000) · Current Review of Pain · doi:10.1007/s11916-000-0078-3 · Cited by 76
“Recently, Jensen et al. [ 17 ] carried out a longitudinal study to statistically compare the validity and reliability of several measures of pain intensity (individual pain rating and composite pain intensity measures).”
BackgroundBeneciuk, J. M., & George, S. Z. (2015) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20140418 · Cited by 77
Chiarotto, A., Vanti, C., Ostelo, R. W., Ferrari, S., Tedesco, G., Rocca, B., Pillastrini, P., & Monticone, M. (2015) · Pain Practice · doi:10.1111/papr.12242 · Cited by 73
Valiente-Castrillo, P., Martín‐Pintado‐Zugasti, A., Calvo‐Lobo, C., Beltrán-Alacreu, H., & Fernández‐Carnero, J. (2020) · Acupuncture in Medicine · doi:10.1177/0964528420920300 · Cited by 77
“The VAS has been shown to have a strong correlation with descriptive scales, as well as high sensitivity and reliability.(29) Consensus recommendations for determining clinically important changes in outcome measures for chronic pain trials suggest that a decrease of 2 points or a 30% reduction in pain intensity on th…”
BackgroundFrøkjær, J. B., Olesen, S. S., & Drewes, A. M. (2013) · Pancreas · doi:10.1097/mpa.0b013e31829628f4 · Cited by 74
Sillevis, R., Cleland, J. A., Hellman, M. A., & Beekhuizen, K. (2010) · Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy · doi:10.1179/106698110x12804993427126 · Cited by 74
Ruskin, D. A., Lalloo, C., Amaria, K., Stinson, J., Kewley, E., Campbell, F. A., Brown, S. C., Jeavons, M., & McGrath, P. A. (2014) · Pain Research and Management · doi:10.1155/2014/856513 · Cited by 76
“Additionally, studies should evaluate whether composite measures (ie, global index of pain versus four levels of pain) may provide more sensitivity to detecting pain changes in clinical settings, as has been shown for adults (46).”
BackgroundGildir, S., Tüzün, E. H., Eroğlu, G., & Eker, L. (2019) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000014520 · Cited by 73
“Headache intensity was evaluated using a 10-cm horizontal Visual Analog Scale (VAS; range: 0=no pain and 10= maximum pain).([16]) The HRQoL assessments of patients were performed at their first examination and at the end of the follow-up period, using the Turkish version of Short Form-36 (SF-36).”
MethodBriggs, A. M., Slater, H., Bunzli, S., Jordan, J. M., Davies, S., Smith, A. J., & Quintner, J. L. (2012) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-357 · Cited by 74
“Average CLBP intensity was measured using an 11 point numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 to 10, with the left anchor 0 = no pain and the right anchor at 10 = maximal imaginable pain [37].”
MethodParkitny, L., McAuley, J. H., Walton, D. M., Costa, L. O. P., Refshauge, K. M., Wand, B. M., Pietro, F. D., & Moseley, G. L. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.05.010 · Cited by 84
“’’ This instrument has been shown to adequately discriminate pain intensity in patients with chronic pain [39,40].”
BackgroundMajor Depressive Disorder and Sleep Disturbance in Patients with Chronic Pain
Emery, P. C., Wilson, K. G., & Kowal, J. (2014) · Pain Research and Management · doi:10.1155/2014/480859 · Cited by 70
Intrathecal Hydromorphone for Chronic Nonmalignant Pain: A Retrospective Study
Anderson, V. C., Cooke, B., & Burchiel, K. J. (2001) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1526-4637.2001.01052.x · Cited by 72
Trampas, A., Kitsios, A., Sykaras, E., Symeonidis, S., & Lazarou, L. (2010) · Physical Therapy in Sport · doi:10.1016/j.ptsp.2010.02.003 · Cited by 72
Koppenhaver, S. L., Fritz, J. M., Hébert, J. J., Kawchuk, G. N., Childs, J. D., Parent, É., Gill, N. W., & Teyhen, D. S. (2011) · Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2011.3632 · Cited by 71
Clark, M. E., Walker, R. L., Gironda, R. J., & Scholten, J. D. (2009) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00590.x · Cited by 72
Meseguer, A. A., Fernández-de-las-Peñas, C., Navarro-Poza, J. L., Rodríguez-Blanco, C., & Gandia, J. J. B. (2006) · Clinical Chiropractic · doi:10.1016/j.clch.2006.06.003 · Cited by 72
Development and initial validation of the activity patterns scale in patients with chronic pain
Esteve, R., Ramírez-Maestre, C., Peters, M. L., Serrano-Ibáñez, E. R., Ruíz-Párraga, G. T., & López-Martínez, A. E. (2016) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2015.12.009 · Cited by 71
Felix, E. R., Cruz‐Almeida, Y., & Widerström-Noga, E. G. (2007) · The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development · doi:10.1682/jrrd.2006.12.0162 · Cited by 70
“NRSs have been used widely to assess pain and have shown high reliability and validity [43].”
Physiological and Psychological Correlates of Sleep in HIV Infection
Robbins, J. L., Phillips, K. D., Dudgeon, W. D., & Hand, G. A. (2004) · Clinical Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/1054773803259655 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Jensen, M. P., Turner, J. A., Romano, J. M., & Fisher, L. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jensen, Mark P
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 157-162
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009568727
- Cited by
- 1,247
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 92 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 52
- FWCI
- 6.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- U.S. Public Health Service (R01 31683)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- chronic pain, pain intensity assessment, reliability statistics, validity, multidisciplinary pain management, longitudinal change detection
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Analgesics, Analysis of Variance, Chronic Disease, Counseling, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Occupational Therapy, Pain, Pain Measurement, Patient Care Team, Psychotherapy, Socioeconomic Factors, Time Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Physical Therapy Modalities, Pain Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review