Cited by 218Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationRheumatoid Arthritis Research and TherapiesOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

Everyday life with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis: independent effects of disease and gender on daily pain, mood, and coping

Affleck, Glenn, Tennen, Howard, Keefe, Francis J, Lefebvre, John C, Kashikar-Zuck, Susmita, Wright, Katherine, Starr, Kathleen, Caldwell, David S·1999·Pain

Abstract

The effects of disease (form of arthritis) and gender on pain, mood, and pain coping strategies were examined in a prospective 30-day diary study of 71 patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and 76 with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Diary instruments included joint pain ratings, POMS-B checklists for positive and negative mood, and the Daily Coping Inventory. Women's average daily pain was 72% greater than men's pain, and RA patients' average daily pain was 42% greater than OA patients' pain. Hierarchical Linear Models were estimated for (a) within-person associations between pain and next-day mood; coping and next-day pain; and coping and next-day mood; and (b) the independent effects of disease and gender on individual intercepts for pain, mood, and coping and on individual slopes for pain-coping-mood relations. Women, regardless of their disease, and RA patients, regardless of their gender, reported more daily pain. Women used more emotion-focused strategies each day than did men, regardless of their disease and even after controlling for their greater pain. Men were more likely than women to report an increase in negative mood the day after a more painful day. RA patients' pain worsened, but OA patients' pain improved, following a day with more emotion-focused coping. Implications for research and clinical practice are summarized.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00167-0

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis, after a day of intense pain, men were much more likely to report an increase in negative mood than women.

    “after a day of intense pain, men were much more likely to report an increase in negative mood than women.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Affleck, G., Tennen, H., Keefe, F. J., Lefebvre, J. C., Kashikar-Zuck, S., Wright, K., Starr, K., & Caldwell, D. S.
Affiliations
  • Ohio University (US)
  • UConn Health (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Affleck, Glenn
Venue
Pain
Published
1999-12-01
Volume
83
Issue
3
Pages
601-609
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121593831
Cited by
218
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 15
FWCI
3.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • International Association for the Study of Pain
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ar035270-11)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR-42261, AR 35270, R01AR042261)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, joint pain, gender differences, mood, emotion-focused coping, daily pain, negative mood, within-person associations
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Affect, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Data Collection, Female, Humans, Male, Osteoarthritis, Prospective Studies, Sex Factors, Cohort Studies, Chi-Square Distribution, Linear Models, Arthralgia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review