CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mapping across domains without feedback: A neural network model of transfer of implicit knowledge

Dienes, Z·1999·Cognitive Science
DOI 10.1016/s0364-0213(99)80052-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0364-0213(99)80052-4

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. In T. Inui & J. McClelland (Eds), Attention and Performance XVI. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  2. Altmann, Cl. T. M., Dienes, Z., & Goode, A. (1995). On the modality independence of implicitly learned gram- matical knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 899- 912.
  3. Brooks, L. (1978). Nonanalytic concept formation and memory for instances. In E. Rosch & B.B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cog&ion and categorization (pp.169-211).
  4. Brooks, L. R.. & Vokey, J. R. (199 1). Abstract analogies and abstracted grammars: Comments on Reber (1989) and Mathews et al.. (1989). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120,316-323.
  5. Cleeremans, A. (1993). Mechanisms of implicit learning: Connecrionisr models of sequence processing. Cam- bridge, MA: MIT Press.
  6. Cleeremans, A., & McClelland, J. L. (1991). Learning the structure of event sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120,235-253.
  7. Dienes, Z., & Altmann, G. (1997). Transfer of implicit knowledge across domains? How implicit and how abstract? In D. Berry (Ed.), How implicir is implicit learning? (pp 107-123). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  8. Dienes, Z.. Altmann, G., Kwan, L, & Goode, A. (1995) Unconscious knowledge of artificial grammars is applied strategically. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1322-1338.
  9. Dienes. Z., & Berry, D. (1997). Implicit learning: below the subjective threshold. Psychonomic Eulferin and Review, 4,3-23.
  10. Dienes, Z., Broadbent, D. E., & Berry, D. C. (1991). Implicit and explicit knowledge bases in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17.875-887. 15516709, 1999, 1, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1207/s15516709cog2301_3, Wiley Online Library on [20/08/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License · DOI
  11. Dienes, Z., & Pemer, J. (1996) Implicit knowledge in people and connectionist networks. In G. Underwood (Ed), Implicir cognition (pp 227-256). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  12. Druhan, B., & Mathews, R. (1989). THIYOS: A classifier system model of implicit knowledge of artificial gram- mars. Proceedings of the Elevenrh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.
  13. Gluck, M. A., & Bower, G. H. (1988). Evaluating an adaptive network of human learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 166-195.
  14. Gomez, R. L., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1994). What is learned from artificial grammars? Transfer tests of simple association. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20,396-410.
  15. Hetherington, P. A., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1989). Is there "catastrophic interference" in connectionist networks? Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp 26-33). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  16. Knowlton, B. J., & Squire, L. R. (1996). Artificial grammar learning depends on implicit acquisition of both abstract and exemplar-specific information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memov, and Cognition, 22, 169-181.
  17. Mama. L., & Reber, A. S. (1997). Representation of tacit knowledge: Transfer across stimulus forms and modal- ities. In D. Berry (Ed.), How implicit is implicit learning? (pp. 73-106). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  18. Mathews, R. C. (1990). Abstractness of implicit grammar knowledge Comments on Perruchet and Pacteau's anal- ysis of synthetic grammar learning. Journal of Experimenral Psychology: General, 119,412-416.
  19. Mathews, R. C. (1991). The forgetting algorithm: How fragmentary knowledge of exemplars can abstact knowl- edge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120. 117-l 19.
  20. Mathews, R. C., Buss, R. R., Stanley, W. B., Blanchard-Fields, F., Cho, J-R., & Druhan. B. (1989). The role of implicit and explicit processes in learning from examples: A synergistic effect. Journal of Experimenral Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognirion, 15, 1083-1100.
  21. Mathews, R. C., & Roussel, L. G. (1997). Abstractness of implicit knowledge: A cognitive evolutionary perspec- tive. In D. Berry (Ed.), How implicit is implicir learning? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  22. McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. (1986). Interactive processes in speech perception: The TRACE model. In J. L. McClelland & D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Parallel disfriburedprocessing. Explorations in fhe microstructure of cognition (pp 58-121). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  23. Meltzoff, A. N. (1981). Imitation, intermodel coordination and representation in early infancy. In G. Butterworth (Ed.), Infancy and epistemology (pp 85-l 14). Brighton: Harvester Press.
  24. Perruchet, P. (1994). Learning from complex rule-governed environments: On the proper function of conscious and unconscious processes. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds), Attenrion and performance XV: con- scious and nonconscious information processing (pp 81 l-835). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  25. Reber, A.S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning ana' Verbal Behaviour, 6,855-863.
  26. Reber, A. S. (1969). Transfer of syntactic structures in synthetic languages. Journal of Experimental Psychoogy, 81, 115-119.
  27. Reber, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tactic knowledge. Journal OfExperimental Psychology: General, 118, 219-235.
  28. Seger, C. A. (1994). Implicit learning. Psychological Bulletin, 11.5, 163-196.
  29. Servan-Schreiber, E., & Anderson, J. R. (1990). Learning artificial grammars with competitive chunking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 592-608.
  30. Shanks, D. R., Johnstone, T., & Staggs, L. (1997). Abstraction processes in artificial grammar learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 5OA, 216252.
  31. Vokey, J. R., & Brooks, L. R. (1992). Salience of item knowledge in learning artificial grammars. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18,328-344.
  32. Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Dorken, M. D. (1993). Incidentally, things in general are particularly determined: An epi- sodic-processing account of implicit learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 227- 248. 15516709, 1999, 1, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1207/s15516709cog2301_3, Wiley Online Library on [20/08/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 4

Metadata

Authors
Dienes, Z.
Venue
Cognitive Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-03
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
53-82
ISSN
0364-0213
DOI
10.1016/s0364-0213(99)80052-4
Cited by
4
References
4
Language
en
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1 (tdm, 6028 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review