Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 967

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enterprise resource planning: A taxonomy of critical factors

Al-Mashari, Majed, Al-Mudimigh, Abdullah, Zairi, Mohamed·2003·European Journal of Operational Research
DOI 10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00554-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00554-4

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Adolph, 1996, Cash cow in the tar pit: Reengineering a legacy system, IEEE Software, 41, 10.1109/52.493019 · DOI
  2. Al-Mashari, M., 2000. A proposed integrative framework for effective SAP R/3 deployment. In: Proceedings of GITM’2000, pp. 39–42
  3. Al-Mashari, 2002, Implementing ERP through SAP R/3: A process change management (PCM) perspective, King Saud University Journal––Computer & Information Sciences Division, 14, 25, 10.1016/S1319-1578(02)80002-7 · DOI
  4. Al-Mashari, M., Zairi, M., 1999. Standardisation through SAP R/3: A proposed model for effective implementation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on SIIT, pp. 19–24
  5. Al-Mashari, M., Al-Mudimigh, A., Zairi, M., 2001. Realizing IT value: The case of enterprise resource planning. In: Proceedings of IRMA’2001
  6. Bingi, 1999, Critical issues affecting an ERP implementation, Information Systems Management, 7, 10.1201/1078/43197.16.3.19990601/31310.2 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Chung, S., Snyder, C., 1999. ERP Initiation––A historical perspective. In: Proceedings of AMCIS
  8. Davenport, 1998, Living with ERP, CIO Magazine
  9. Davenport, 1998, Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system, Harvard Business Review, 121
  10. Gable, 1998, Large package software: A neglected technology, Journal of Global Information Management, 6, 3
  11. Gable, G., Scott, J., Davenport, T., 1998. Cooperative ERP life-cycle knowledge management. In: Proceedings of the 9th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Sydney, Australia
  12. Gibson, 1999, A case study of a fast track SAP R/3 implementation at Guilbert, Electronic Markets, 190
  13. Grady, 1991, Performance measurement: Implementing strategy, Management Accounting (US), 49
  14. Gumaer, 1996, Beyond ERP and MRP II, IIE Solutions, 28, 32
  15. Gupta, 2000, Enterprise resource planning: The emerging organizational value systems, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 100, 114, 10.1108/02635570010286131 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Holland, 1999, A critical success factors model for ERP implementation, IEEE Software, 30, 10.1109/52.765784 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Holland, C., Light, B., Gibson, N., 1998. Global enterprise resource planning implementation. In: Proceedings of the American Conference On Information Systems. Global Information Technology and Global Electronic Commerce Mini-Track, Baltimore, August 14–16
  18. Holsapple, C., Sena, M., 1999. Enterprise system for organizational decision support: A research agenda. In: Proceedings of AMCIS
  19. Kaplan, 1992, The balanced scorecard––measures that drive performance, Harvard Business Review, 71
  20. Kelley, H., Compeau, D., Higgins, C., 1999. Attribution analysis of computer self-fficacy. In: Proceedings of AMCIS
  21. Li, 1999, ERP packages: What’s next?, Information Systems Management, 16, 31, 10.1201/1078/43197.16.3.19990601/31313.5 · DOI
  22. Luftman, 1999, Achieving and sustaining business–IT alignment, California Management Review, 42, 109, 10.2307/41166021 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Lyytinen, 1987, Information systems failures––a survey and classification of the empirical literature, Oxford Surveys in Information Technology, 4, 257
  24. Martin, 1998, An ERP strategy, Fortune, 2, 95
  25. Pawlowsiki, S., Boudreau, M., 1999. Constraints and flexibility in enterprise systems: A dialectic of system and job. In: Proceedings of AMCIS
  26. Radding, 1998, The push to integrate-packaged applications promise to speed integration and cut costs, Information Week, 671
  27. Rao, 2000, Enterprise resource planning: Business needs and technologies, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 100, 81, 10.1108/02635570010286078 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Rao, 2000, Enterprise resource planning: Business needs and technologies, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 100, 81, 10.1108/02635570010286078 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Rizzi, 1999, Efficiency improvement in manual warehouses through ERP systems implementation and redesign of the logistics processes, Logistics Information Management, 12, 367, 10.1108/09576059910295805 · DOI
  30. Roberts, 1992, MRP II implementation: Key factors for success, Computer Integrated Manufacturing System, 5, 31, 10.1016/0951-5240(92)90016-6 · DOI
  31. Rockart, 1996, Eight imperatives for the new IT organization, Sloan Management Review, 38, 43
  32. Rosemann, M., 1999. ERP-software-characteristics and consequences. In: Proceeding of the 7th European Conference on Information Systems, 1999-ECIS’99, Copenhaven, DK
  33. Scheer, 2000, Making ERP a success, Communications of the ACM, 43, 57, 10.1145/332051.332073 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Shang, S., Seddon, P., 2000. A comprehensive framework for classifying the benefits of ERP systems. In: Proceedings of AMCIS’2000, vol. II, pp. 1005–1014
  35. Sinclair, 2000, Performance measurement: A critical analysis of the literature with respect to total quality management, International Journal of Management Reviews, 2, 145, 10.1111/1468-2370.00035 · DOI
  36. Slevin, 1987, Balancing strategy and tactics in project implementation, Sloan Management Review, 33
  37. Slooten, K., Yap, L., 1999. Implementing ERP information systems using SAP. In: Proceedings of AMCIS
  38. Sumner, M., 1999. Critical success factors in enterprise wide information management systems projects. In: Proceeding of the SIGCPR’99, New Orleans, LA · DOI · Paper page
  39. Volkoff, O., 1999. Using the structurational model of technology to analyze an ERP implementation. In: Proceedings of AMCIS, pp. 235–237
  40. Waston, E., Rosemann, M., Stewart, G., 1999. An overview of teaching and research using SAP R/3. In: Proceedings of AMCIS

Cited by

See all 967

Metadata

Authors
Al-Mashari, M., Al-Mudimigh, A., & Zairi, M.
Venue
European Journal of Operational Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-04
Volume
146
Issue
2
Pages
352-364
ISSN
0377-2217 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00554-4
OpenAlex
W1965925478
Cited by
967
References
6
FWCI
29.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enterprise resource planning: A taxonomy of critical factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00554-4
The paper
Al-Mashari, M., Al-Mudimigh, A., & Zairi, M. (2003). Enterprise resource planning: A taxonomy of critical factors. European Journal of Operational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00554-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.