The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Implementation of Business Process Reengineering
Abstract
:As more organizations undertake business process reengineering (BPR), issues in implementing BPR projects become a major concern. This field research seeks empirically to explore the problems of implementing reengineering projects and how the severity of these problems relates to BPR project success. Based on past theories and research related to the implementation of organizational change as well as field experience of reengineering experts, a comprehensive list of sixty-four BPR implementation problems was identified. The severity of each problem was then rated by those who have participated in reengineering in 105 organizations. Analysis of the results clearly demonstrates the central importance of change management in BPR implementation success. Resolutions of problems in other areas such as technological competence and project planning were also determined to be necessary, but not sufficient, conditions for reengineering success. Further, problems that are more directly related to the conduct of a project such as process delineation, project management, and tactical planning were perceived as less difficult, yet highly related to project success. This situation was also true for human resource problems such as training personnel for the redesigned process. These findings suggest that reengineering project implementation is complex, involving many factors. To succeed, it is essential that change be managed and that balanced attention be paid to all identified factors, including those that are more contextual (e.g., management support and technological competence) as well as factors that pertain directly to the conduct of the project (e.g., project management and process delineation). As one of the first pieces of empirical evidence based on a field study, this research emphasizes the importance of addressing BPR implementation within the broader context of organizational change in a complex sociotechnical environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs
Churchill, G. A. (1979) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377901600110 · Cited by 16,549
Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.3.1.60 · Cited by 10,697
Information Technology and Organizational Change: Causal Structure in Theory and Research
Markus, M. L., & Robey, D. (1988) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.34.5.583 · Cited by 2,108
MIS problems and failures: A socio- technical perspective
Bostrom, R. P., & Heinen, J. S. (1977) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/248710 · Cited by 1,329
User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research
Ives, B., & Olson, M. H. (1984) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.30.5.586 · Cited by 1,318
Cited by
Mikalef, P., & Gupta, M. (2021) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2021.103434 · Cited by 1,700
Chowdhury, S., Dey, P., Joel-Edgar, S., Bhattacharya, S., Rodriguez-Espindola, O., Abadie, A., & Truong, L. (2023) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100899 · Cited by 927
Somers, T. M., & Nelson, K. (2005) · Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.1109/hicss.2001.927129 · Cited by 873
A taxonomy of players and activities across the ERP project life cycle
Somers, T. M., & Nelson, K. G. (2004) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(03)00023-5 · Cited by 694
Lockamy, A., & McCormack, K. (2004) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13598540410550019 · Cited by 561
Metadata
- Authors
- Grover, V., Jeong, S. R., Kettinger, W. J., & Teng, J. T. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Information Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 109-144
- ISSN
- 0742-1222 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-928X
- OpenAlex
- W1487478267
- Cited by
- 606
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 27.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Implementation of Business Process Reengineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07421222.1995.11518072
- The paper
- Grover, V., Jeong, S. R., Kettinger, W. J., & Teng, J. T. C. (1995). The Implementation of Business Process Reengineering. Journal of Management Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1995.11518072
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.