Cited by 60

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cosmological pair production of charged and rotating black holes

Booth, I.S., Mann, R.B.·1999·Nuclear Physics B

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0550-3213(98)00756-1

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Classical SdS black holes in four or higher spacetime dimensions have an upper bound on their mass in order to avoid a naked singularity.

    “It is well known that classical SdS black holes (in four or higher spacetime dimensions) have an upper bound on their mass in order to avoid the presence of a naked singularity.”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [107]

  • The largest mass black hole is known as the Nariai black hole, with mass MN.

    “This largest mass black hole is known as the Nariai black hole [107], with mass M N .”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [107]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Dowker, 1994, Phys. Rev. D, 49, 2909, 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.2909 · DOI
  2. Dowker, 1994, Phys. Rev. D, 50, 2662, 10.1103/PhysRevD.50.2662 · DOI
  3. Garfinkle, 1994, Phys. Rev. D, 49, 958, 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.958 · DOI
  4. Hawking, 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 51, 4302, 10.1103/PhysRevD.51.4302 · DOI
  5. Mann, 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 52, 2254, 10.1103/PhysRevD.52.2254 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bousso, 1996, Phys. Rev. D, 54, 6312, 10.1103/PhysRevD.54.6312 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Hawking, 1995, Phys. Rev. Lett., 75, 3382, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.3382 · DOI
  8. Emparan, 1995, Phys. Rev. Lett., 75, 3386, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.3386 · DOI
  9. Eardley, 1995, Phys. Rev. Lett., 75, 3390, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.3390 · DOI
  10. Caldwell, 1996, Phys. Rev. D, 53, 7103, 10.1103/PhysRevD.53.7103 · DOI
  11. Mann, 1997, Class. Quant. Grav., 14, L109, 10.1088/0264-9381/14/5/007 · DOI
  12. Mann, 1998, Nucl. Phys. B, 516, 357, 10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00833-X · DOI
  13. Plebanski, 1976, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.), 98, 98, 10.1016/0003-4916(76)90240-2 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Gibbons, 1979, Comm. Math. Phys., 66, 291, 10.1007/BF01197189 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Brown, 1991, Phys. Rev. Lett., 66, 2281, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.2281 · DOI
  16. Brown, 1993, Phys. Rev. D, 47, 1407, 10.1103/PhysRevD.47.1407 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Brown, 1993, Phys. Rev. D, 47, 1420, 10.1103/PhysRevD.47.1420 · DOI
  18. Gibbons, 1977, Phys. Rev. D, 15, 2752, 10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2752 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Kinnersley, 1970, Phys. Rev. D, 2, 1359, 10.1103/PhysRevD.2.1359 · DOI
  20. Mellor, 1989, Class. Quant. Grav., 6, 1379, 10.1088/0264-9381/6/10/008 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Gibbons, 1977, Phys. Rev. D, 15, 2738, 10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2738 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Ginsparg, 1983, Nucl. Phys. B, 222, 245, 10.1016/0550-3213(83)90636-3 · DOI
  23. Bousso, 1997, Phys. Rev. D, 55, 3614, 10.1103/PhysRevD.55.3614 · DOI
  24. Gibbons, 1995, Commun. Math. Phys., 44, 245, 10.1007/BF01609829 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Page, 1976, Phys. Rev. D, 13, 198, 10.1103/PhysRevD.13.198 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Page, 1976, Phys. Rev. D, 14, 3260, 10.1103/PhysRevD.14.3260 · DOI
  27. Chambers, 1997, Phys. Rev. Lett., 78, 3249, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.3249 · DOI
  28. Tachizawa, 1983, Phys. Lett. A, 172, 325, 10.1016/0375-9601(93)90111-C · DOI
  29. Lapedes, 1981, Phys. Rev. D, 24, 1981, 10.1103/PhysRevD.24.1478 · DOI
  30. Wu, 1997, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 6, 199, 10.1142/S0218271897000121 · DOI
  31. R. Bousso and A. Chamblin, gr-qc/9803047. · arXiv
  32. Hawking, 1996, Class. Quant. Grav., 13, 2735, 10.1088/0264-9381/13/10/012 · DOI
  33. Hayward, 1993, Phys. Rev. D, 47, 3275, 10.1103/PhysRevD.47.3275 · DOI
  34. Brown, 1997, Phys. Rev. D, 56, 1001, 10.1103/PhysRevD.56.1001 · DOI
  35. Hawking, 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 52, 5865, 10.1103/PhysRevD.52.5865 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Booth, I. S., & Mann, R. B.
Venue
Nuclear Physics B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-01
Volume
539
Issue
1-2
Pages
267-306
ISSN
0550-3213
Cited by
60
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review