The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investigation of Factors Contributing to the Success of Cross‐Functional Teams
Abstract
Although recent empirical research shows that most firms have implemented cross-functional teams for the majority of the new product development projects undertaken, they are still finding it hard to ensure that these teams are successful in completing the new product development task. In this article, the author first reviews the vast literature on cross-functional new product development teams to uncover the array of factors that have previously been demonstrated or hypothesized to relate to cross-functional team success, when measured at the project level. He then analyzes the responses of 112 new product development professionals to determine which factors are more frequently mentioned as leading to project success. In looking at how to achieve successful teams, many factors have been suggested in the literature by a number of different researchers. The author suggests a model of these factors that divides them into three categories that help achieve success. Setting the stage for product development by developing appropriate project goals, empowering the team with the needed decision-making power, assigning the appropriate human resources, and creating a productive climate should be related to fostering team success. Of these four factors, appropriate project goals is mentioned most often as being associated with success, followed by empowerment. Several specific team behaviors, including cooperation, commitment to the project, ownership of the project, and respect and trust among team members, also have been posited to contribute to team success. Of these, this research finds that cooperation is mentioned most often as being associated with success, followed by commitment and ownership. Finally, a number of researchers have suggested that team leaders, senior managers, and champions provide enabling support to cross-functional teams in achieving success. Team leadership is the most frequently mentioned enabler, according to these findings, followed by senior management support. The author's results also show that increased use of cross-functional teams in new product development is related to higher project success. However, achieving cross-functional team success appears to be more complicated than previously thought. For example, across the set of factors identified in this research, the most frequently mentioned is obtaining the team behavior of cooperation. Setting appropriate project goals, a stage-setting step that is completed early in the project, follows closely in relative importance. Finally, providing good team leadership as an enabler is the third most frequently mentioned factor in achieving success. This suggests that companies must work in all dimensions to maximize the probability of achieving team success.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process
Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J. (1978) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1978.4305755 · Cited by 4,527
Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration.
Hall, R. H., Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1968) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391270 · Cited by 4,325
Product development: Past research, present findings and future directions
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258850 · Cited by 3,777
Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms
Dougherty, D. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.2.179 · Cited by 2,744
Content Analysis in Consumer Research
Kassarjian, H. H. (1977) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208674 · Cited by 2,303
Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams
Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393475 · Cited by 2,217
Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance
Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.321 · Cited by 1,822
PDMA Research on New Product Development Practices: Updating Trends and Benchmarking Best Practices
Griffin, A. (1997) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/1540-5885.1460429 · Cited by 1,490
New Products: What Separates Winners from Losers?
Cooper, R. G., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1987) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1016/0737-6782(87)90002-6 · Cited by 1,313
A Model of New Product Development: An Empirical Test
Zirger, B. J., & Maidique, M. A. (1990) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.36.7.867 · Cited by 837
Cited by
Leadership and organizational learning's role on innovation and performance: Lessons from Spain
Aragón-Correa, J. A., García-Morales, V. J., & Cordón-Pozo, E. (2007) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.09.006 · Cited by 608
Transformational leadership and project success: The mediating role of team-building
Aga, D. A., Noorderhaven, N., & Vallejo, B. (2016) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.02.012 · Cited by 486
Fitzsimons, G. M., Finkel, E. J., & vanDellen, M. R. (2015) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0039654 · Cited by 448
Innovation in Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Recent Research
Länsisalmi, H., Kivimäki, M., Aalto, P., & Ruoranen, R. (2006) · Nursing Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0894318405284129 · Cited by 262
García‐Morales, V. J., Matías‐Reche, F., & Hurtado‐Torres, N. (2008) · Journal of Organizational Change Management · doi:10.1108/09534810810856435 · Cited by 254
Metadata
- Authors
- McDonough, E. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Product Innovation Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-05-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 221-235
- ISSN
- 0737-6782 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2108828868
- Cited by
- 538
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 13.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Investigation of Factors Contributing to the Success of Cross‐Functional Teams. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0737-6782(00)00041-2
- The paper
- McDonough, E. F. (2000). Investigation of Factors Contributing to the Success of Cross‐Functional Teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0737-6782(00)00041-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.