Cited by 565Nutritional Studies and DietNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention

A rapid food screener to assess fat and fruit and vegetable intake

Block, Gladys, Gillespie, Christina, Rosenbaum, Ernest H, Jenson, Christopher·2000·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Background The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends that Americans lower dietary fat and cholesterol intake and increase fiber and fruit/vegetables to reduce prevalence of heart disease, cancer, stroke, hypertension, obesity, and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in the United States. To provide preventive services to all, a rapid, inexpensive, and valid method of assessing dietary intake is needed.Methods We used a one-page food intake screener based on national nutrition data. Respondents can complete and score the screener in a few minutes and can receive immediate, brief feedback. Two hundred adults self-administered the food screener. We compared fat, fiber, and fruit/vegetable intake estimates derived from the screener with estimates from a full-length, 100-item validated questionnaire.Results The screener was effective in identifying persons with high-fat intake, or low-fruit/vegetable intake. We found correlations of 0.6-0.7 (p<0. 0001) for total fat, saturated fat, cholesterol, and fruit/vegetable intake. The screener could identify persons with high percentages of calories from fat, total fat, saturated fat, or cholesterol, and persons with low intakes of vitamin C, fiber, or potassium.Conclusions This screener is a useful tool for quickly monitoring patients' diets. The health care provider can use it as a prelude to brief counseling or as the first stage of triage. Persons who score poorly can be referred for more extensive evaluation by low-cost paper-and-pencil methods. Those who still have poor scores at the second stage ultimately can be referred for in-person counseling.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00119-7

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Hunter 2008, at six months, participants in the computer intervention arm improved their fibre intake more than control arm participants, as measured by the dietary fibre score (MD 1.3, 95% CI 0.5 to 2.1; P = 0.001; 399 participants).

    “Dietary fibre intake was examined in a single study (Hunter 2008), which found that at six months participants in the computer intervention arm improved their fibre intake more than participants in the control arm, as measured by the dietary fibre score (Block 2000) (MD 1.3 (95% 0.5 to 2.1); P = 0.001; 399 participants; Analysis 1.17).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Block, G., Gillespie, C., Rosenbaum, E. H., & Jenson, C.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Shaklee (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Block, Gladys
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-05
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
284-288
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093430881
Cited by
565
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 29
FWCI
6.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Keywords
dietary fat intake, saturated fat, cholesterol intake, fruit and vegetable intake, dietary fiber, self-administered questionnaire, screening validity, brief counseling, triage, preventive medicine
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude to Health, Diet Surveys, Dietary Fats, Eating, Energy Metabolism, Female, Fruit, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Preventive Medicine, Probability, San Francisco, Sensitivity and Specificity, Vegetables, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review