Cited by 136Obesity, Physical Activity, DietMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsObesity and Health Practices

Weight Management Using the Internet

Hunter, Christine M., Peterson, Alan L., Alvarez, Lisa M., Poston, Walker C., Brundige, Antoinette R., Haddock, C. Keith, Van Brunt, David L., Foreyt, John P.·2008·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Background Most weight-loss research targets obese individuals who desire large weight reductions. However, evaluation of weight-gain prevention in overweight individuals is also critical as most Americans become obese as a result of a gradual gain of 1-2 pounds per year over many years.Method This study evaluated the efficacy of an Internet-based program for weight-loss and weight-gain prevention with a two-group, prospective, randomized controlled trial. A military medical research center with a population of 17,000 active-duty military personnel supplied 446 overweight individuals (222 men; 224 women) with a mean age of 34 years and a mean BMI of 29. Recruitment and study participation occurred 2003-2005 and data were analyzed in 2006. Participants were randomly assigned to receive the 6-month behavioral Internet treatment (BIT, n=227) or usual care (n=224). Change in body weight, BMI, percent body fat, and waist circumference; presented as group by time interactions, were measured.Results After 6 months, completers who received BIT lost 1.3 kg while those assigned to usual care gained 0.6 kg (F((df=366))=24.17; I<0.001). Results were similar for the intention-to-treat model. BIT participants also had significant changes in BMI (-0.5 vs +0.2 kg/m(2); F((df=366))=24.58); percent body fat (-0.4 vs +0.6%; F((df=366))=10.45); and waist circumference (-2.1 vs -0.4 cm; F((df=366))=17.09); p<0.001 for all.Conclusions Internet-based weight-management interventions result in small amounts of weight loss, prevent weight gain, and have potential for widespread dissemination as a population health approach.Trial registration NCT00417599.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.09.026

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After six months of treatment, participants in the computer-based intervention lost more weight than participants in the control intervention (MD -1.5 kg, 95% CI -2.1 to -0.9, P < 0.00001; 511 participants; two trials).

    “After six months of treatment, participants in the computer-based intervention lost more weight than participants in the control intervention (MD −1.5 kg (95% CI −2.1 to −0.9); P < 0.00001; 511 participants; two trials; Analysis 1.2) (Figure 4).”
  • Hunter 2008 stated that the study could not be blinded.

    “Hunter 2008 stated that the study could not be blinded.”
  • Several trials (Bennett 2010; Hunter 2008; Morgan 2009; Morgan 2011; Wylie-Rosett 2001) tested for and demonstrated statistically significant positive associations between amount of computer use and amount of weight loss in the intervention group.

    “Several trials (Bennett 2010; Hunter 2008; Morgan 2009; Morgan 2011; Wylie-Rosett 2001) tested for and demonstrated statistically significant positive associations between amount of computer use, measured in a variety of ways, and amount of weight loss in the intervention group.”
  • In Hunter 2008, at six months, participants in the computer intervention arm improved their fibre intake more than control arm participants, as measured by the dietary fibre score (MD 1.3, 95% CI 0.5 to 2.1; P = 0.001; 399 participants).

    “Dietary fibre intake was examined in a single study (Hunter 2008), which found that at six months participants in the computer intervention arm improved their fibre intake more than participants in the control arm, as measured by the dietary fibre score (Block 2000) (MD 1.3 (95% 0.5 to 2.1); P = 0.001; 399 participants; Analysis 1.17).”
  • In Hunter 2008, at six months, the decrease in percent calories from fat was slightly greater in the computer intervention arm than the control arm (MD −1.1%, 95% CI −2.0 to −0.2; P = 0.02; 399 participants).

    “The decrease in percent calories from fat at six months was slightly greater in the computer intervention arm than the control arm of one study (Hunter 2008) (MD −1.1% (95% CI −2.0 to −0.2); P = 0.02; 399 participants; Analysis 1.15).”

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hunter, C. M., Peterson, A. L., Alvarez, L. M., Poston, W. C., Brundige, A. R., Haddock, C. K., Van Brunt, D. L., & Foreyt, J. P.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • University of Missouri–Kansas City (US)
Corresponding author
Hunter, Christine M.
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-02
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
119-126
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1705513177
Cited by
136
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
FWCI
12.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
weight management, online intervention, weight loss, weight gain prevention, overweight adults, behavioral interventions, body mass index, body fat percentage, waist circumference, military personnel, obesity prevention
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Military Personnel, Obesity, Texas, User-Computer Interface, Weight Loss, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review