The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strategy training and working memory task performance
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Turley-Ames and Whitfield11 found that for low WM span individuals, strategy instruction (especially a rehearsal strategy that was contrasted with an imagery strategy and a semantic strategy) improved complex span performance.”
From The early effects of external and internal strategies on working memory updating training (2018) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The present results using the n-back paradigm align well with previous findings mainly from complex span studies that have indicated that explicit WM strategy instruction can be effective10–13, and that self-generated WM strategies are associated with higher task performance9,10,14–16.”
From The early effects of external and internal strategies on working memory updating training (2018) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Earlier studies with WM strategy intervention have not explicitly reported results from power analyses10–13.”
From The early effects of external and internal strategies on working memory updating training (2018) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The description of rehearsal or chunking (McNamara & Scott, 2001; Peng & Fuchs, 2017; Turley-Ames & Whitfield, 2003) does not capture the unique structure of WM tasks, which are designed to require online manipulations that cannot be organized into fixed chunks, or at least not in any straightforward manner.”
From Training-induced improvement in working memory tasks results from switching to efficient strategies (2021) · cites this paper as Turley-Ames & Whitfield, 2003
Citations
Cites
Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-3352 · Cited by 36,647
Individual differences in working memory and reading
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(80)90312-6 · Cited by 6,336
A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.1.122 · Cited by 4,153
Depth of Processing and the Retention of Words in Episodic Memory
Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268 · Cited by 4,121
Exploring the Central Executive
Baddeley, A. (1996) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/713755608 · Cited by 2,390
Is working memory capacity task dependent?
Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(89)90040-5 · Cited by 2,299
DEFICITS IN STRATEGY APPLICATION FOLLOWING FRONTAL LOBE DAMAGE IN MAN
SHALLICE, T., & BURGESS, P. W. (1991) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/114.2.727 · Cited by 2,017
Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?!
Kyllonen, P. C., & Christal, R. E. (1990) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0160-2896(05)80012-1 · Cited by 1,810
Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory
King, J., & Just, M. A. (1991) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(91)90027-h · Cited by 1,228
Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension.
Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Woolley, J. D. (1982) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.111.2.228 · Cited by 875
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide
Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196772 · Cited by 2,882
Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.1.47 · Cited by 1,725
Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., & Engle, R. W. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.189 · Cited by 1,679
Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence
Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.005 · Cited by 1,223
Do “brain-training” programs work?
Simons, D. J., Boot, W. R., Charness, N., Gathercole, S. E., Chabris, C. F., Hambrick, D. Z., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2016) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100616661983 · Cited by 1,183
Metadata
- Authors
- Turley-Ames, K.
- Affiliations
- Idaho State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Turley-Ames, K
- Venue
- Journal of Memory and Language
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 446-468
- ISSN
- 0749-596X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1969255917
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 9.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Memory and Language (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Keywords
- working memory span, strategy training, rehearsal strategies, semantic strategies, operation span, Nelson-Denny Reading Test, reading skills
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
