Cited by 2,299Cognitive Abilities and TestingReading and Literacy DevelopmentNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Is working memory capacity task dependent?

Turner, Marilyn L, Engle, Randall W·1989·Journal of Memory and Language

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0749-596x(89)90040-5

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Operation Span task used the Spanish adapted version of the procedure developed by Turner and Engle (1989).

    “We used the Spanish adapted version of the procedure developed by Turner and Engle (1989) (Turner and Engle, 1989; Tokowicz et al., 2004; Redick et al., 2012).”

    From Training on Working Memory and Inhibitory Control in Young Adults (2016) · cites this paper as Turner and Engle (1989)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W.
Affiliations
  • Wichita State University (US)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
  • Turner, Marilyn L
  • Engle, Randall W
Venue
Journal of Memory and Language
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-04
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
127-154
ISSN
0749-596X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1997544838
Cited by
2,299
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 103 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 108 · 2018: 102 · 2017: 113 · 2016: 118 · 2015: 124 · 2014: 126 · 2013: 101 · 2012: 111
FWCI
14.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Memory and Language (publishedVersion)
Funders
Air Force Office of Scientific Research (870069)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
working memory capacity, complex span, reading comprehension, arithmetic exercises, word span, digit span, SAT scores, quantitative skills, task difficulty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review