Cited by 275Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchBehavioral and Psychological StudiesChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Behavioral treatment of autistic persons: A review of research from 1980 to the present

Matson, J·1996·Research in Developmental Disabilities

Abstract

Studies evaluating behavioral treatment of autism from 1980 to the present were reviewed. Studies included were published in journal articles and utilized behavioral methodology. A total of 251 studies were included in the review. Each study was analyzed for target behaviors and behavioral techniques implemented. Target behaviors were divided into categories, which included aberrant behaviors, social skills, language, daily living skills, and academic skills. Behavioral techniques were classified as positive, negative, extinction, or combined. Results were presented for each category. Recent trends in the treatment literature were also reviewed, and recommendations for future research were presented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0891-4222(96)00030-3

Cites

127 of 127 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Behavior analytic intervention programs have been repeatedly found to improve socially appropriate behavior and cognitive skills while diminishing dysfunctional activities in ASD.

    “On the one hand, behavior analytic intervention programs, which place reward-based reinforcement at the heart of their treatment system, have been repeatedly found to improve socially appropriate behavior and cognitive skills while diminishing dysfunctional activities [32].”
  • Later programs focusing on functional analysis of problem behaviors were more successful in addressing core deficits.

    “Later programs focusing on the functional (that is, contextual) analysis of problem behaviors were more successful in addressing core deficits [3,5,6,32,42,190-196].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 128 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matson, J.
Affiliations
Louisiana State University (US)
Corresponding author
Matson, J
Venue
Research in Developmental Disabilities
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-12
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
433-465
ISSN
0891-4222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008945259
Cited by
275
References
128
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 19
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research in Developmental Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, behavior therapy, applied behavior analysis, target behavior, aberrant behavior, social skills, language development, daily living skills, academic skills, extinction, positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement, treatment trends
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Behavior Therapy, Humans, Social Behavior Disorders, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review