Cited by 183Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative StressRedox biology and oxidative stress

Biomarkers of oxidative stress are significantly elevated in Down syndrome

Jovanovic, Slobodan V, Clements, Debbie, MacLeod, Kent·1998·Free Radical Biology and Medicine

Abstract

There is convincing epidemiological and in vitro evidence of chronic oxidative stress in individuals with Down syndrome (DS). These individuals develop Alzheimer like changes in the brain in their 30s and 40s. The incidence of autoimmune diseases and cataracts is significantly increased, and the overall ageing process is accelerated. In vitro studies show that impaired viability of DS neurons may be amended by simple chemical antioxidants, such as vitamin E, BHT and propyl gallate, clearly indicative of oxyl radical involvement. However, because of the lack of in vivo experiments, the role of oxidative stress in DS remains controversial. We report here on the results of the chemical analyses of urine samples of 166 individuals, where DS subjects were matched by their siblings. The levels of 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (2.35 +/- 1.69 in DS vs. 1.35 +/- 1.04 in controls, P = 0.00011), a biomarker of oxidative damage to DNA, and malondialdehyde (0.255 +/- 0.158 in DS vs. 0.204 +/- 0.128 in controls, P = 0.033), a biomarker of lipid peroxidation, are significantly elevated in individuals with DS. Dietary influences failed to show any significant correlation with the oxidative stress biomarkers. These results provide direct evidence for increased oxidative stress in individuals with DS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0891-5849(98)00137-3

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dysfunction of mitochondria and increased levels of oxidative stress in brain, neuronal cell cultures, urine, and erythrocytes confirmed in individuals with Down syndrome.

    “Dysfunction of mitochondria and increased levels of oxidative stress in the brain, neuronal cell cultures, urine, and erythrocytes have been confirmed in individuals with Down syndrome (Jovanovic et al. 1998).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jovanovic, S. V., Clements, D., & MacLeod, K.
Venue
Free Radical Biology and Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-12
Volume
25
Issue
9
Pages
1044-1048
ISSN
0891-5849 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063321102
Cited by
183
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
9.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Free Radical Biology and Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Redox biology and oxidative stress
Keywords
Down syndrome, oxidative stress, biomarkers, 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine, malondialdehyde, oxidative DNA damage, lipid peroxidation, urine analysis, accelerated aging, antioxidants, dietary factors
MeSH terms
8-Hydroxy-2'-Deoxyguanosine, Child, Child, Preschool, Deoxyguanosine, Diet, Down Syndrome, Humans, Malondialdehyde, Biomarkers, Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substances, Oxidative Stress, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review