The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life
Abstract
This article reviews current approaches to defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and provides guidelines for their use. Definitions of clinically meaningful change are discussed. Two broad methods for identifying clinically meaningful change are contrasted: anchor-based methods and distribution-based methods. Anchor-based methods include cross-sectional approaches and longitudinal approaches. Distribution-based methods include those based on statistical significance, sample variability, and measurement precision. Anchor-based and distribution-based methods have advantages and limitations, and neither seems to be superior to the other. An integrated system for defining clinically meaningful change is recommended that combines anchor-based and distribution-based methods. We propose a new terminology for describing meaningful change derived from anchor-based and distribution-based methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection
Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 · Cited by 30,033
Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., Filiberti, A., Flechtner, H., Fleishman, S. B., Haes, J. C. J. M. D., et al. (1993) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/85.5.365 · Cited by 16,005
Missing data: our view of the state of the art
Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.2.147 · Cited by 11,638
Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.59.1.12 · Cited by 7,770
The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure
Cella, D. F., Tulsky, D. S., Gray, G., Sarafian, B., Linn, E., Bonomi, A., Silberman, M., Yellen, S. B., Winicour, P., & Brannon, J. (1993) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1993.11.3.570 · Cited by 6,020
Jones, P. W., Quirk, F. H., Baveystock, C. M., & Littlejohns, P. (1992) · American Review of Respiratory Disease · doi:10.1164/ajrccm/145.6.1321 · Cited by 3,035
Effect Sizes for Interpreting Changes in Health Status
Kazis, L. E., Anderson, J. J., & Meenan, R. F. (1989) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198903001-00015 · Cited by 2,401
Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?
McHorney, C. A., & Tarlov, A. R. (1995) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/bf01593882 · Cited by 2,206
A measure of quality of life for clinical trials in chronic lung disease
Guyatt, G. H., Berman, L. B., Townsend, M., Pugsley, S. O., & Chambers, L. W. (1987) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thx.42.10.773 · Cited by 1,721
Jacobson, N. S., Follette, W. C., & Revenstorf, D. (1984) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(84)80002-7 · Cited by 1,294
Self-rated health and mortality in the NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study
Idler, E. L., & Angel, R. J. (1990) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.80.4.446 · Cited by 864
Development of a brief measure to assess quality of life in obesity
Kolotkin, R. L., Crosby, R. D., Kosloski, K. D., & Williams, G. R. (2001) · Obesity Research · doi:10.1038/oby.2001.13 · Cited by 641
Development of the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory
Devinsky, O., Vickrey, B. G., Cramer, J., Perrine, K., Hermann, B., Meador, K., & Hays, R. D. (1995) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/j.1528-1157.1995.tb00467.x · Cited by 634 · cited 2×
“In addition to generic measures of HRQOL, disease-specific measures of HRQOL have been developed for assessing HRQOL in a variety of diseases, including obesity [8–12], arthritis [13–14], diabetes [15–18], asthma [19–21], pulmonary disease [22], cancer [23–26], epilepsy [27], and HIV [28].”
BackgroundPsychometric considerations in evaluating health-related quality of life measures
Hays, R. D., Anderson, R., & Revicki, D. (1993) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/bf00422218 · Cited by 513
Speer, D. C., & Greenbaum, P. E. (1995) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.63.6.1044 · Cited by 216
Cited by
Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires
Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D. M., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A. W. M., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012 · Cited by 10,764
Dworkin, R. H., Turk, D. C., Wyrwich, K. W., Beaton, D., Cleeland, C. S., Farrar, J. T., Haythornthwaite, J. A., Jensen, M. P., Kerns, R. D., Ader, D. N., et al. (2008) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2007.09.005 · Cited by 3,471
COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures
Prinsen, C. A. C., Mokkink, L. B., Bouter, L. M., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., de Vet, H. C. W., & Terwee, C. B. (2018) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3 · Cited by 3,345
Ostelo, R. W. J. G., Deyo, R. A., Stratford, P., Waddell, G., Croft, P., Von Korff, M., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. (2008) · Spine · doi:10.1097/brs.0b013e31815e3a10 · Cited by 2,009
Barber, M. D., Walters, M. D., & Bump, R. C. (2005) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.025 · Cited by 1,357
Metadata
- Authors
- Crosby, R. D., Kolotkin, R. L., & Williams, G. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 395-407
- ISSN
- 0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2078378191
- Cited by
- 1,332
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 61.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
