Cited by 513Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifePsychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth Education and Validation

Psychometric considerations in evaluating health-related quality of life measures

Hays, R. D., Anderson, R., Revicki, D.·1993·Quality of Life Research

Abstract

How does one determine if a measure of health-related quality of life (HRQL) is adequate for clinical trials? Psychometric methods are frequently used to answer this question. What is psychometrics all about? In this paper we address these questions, discussing common psychometric evaluation procedures applied to HRQL measures. Specifically, we discuss issues regarding the evaluation of reliability and validity (including responsiveness).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00422218

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The quality of a questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life depends on fulfillment of psychometric criteria including objectivity, reliability, validity, and responsiveness to change.

    “The quality of a questionnaire to assess health-related QoL depends on the fulfillment of psychometric criteria. These include, in addition to objectivity, the reliability of the instrument as well as its validity, and for evaluative purposes, its responsiveness to change.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hays, R. D., Anderson, R., & Revicki, D.
Affiliations
  • RAND Corporation (US)
  • Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist (US)
  • Battelle (US)
Venue
Quality of Life Research
Published
1993-12
Volume
2
Issue
6
Pages
441-449
ISSN
  • 0962-9343 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2649
OpenAlex
W1995509648
Cited by
513
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 28
FWCI
6.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Quality of Life Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
health-related quality of life, psychometric assessment, reliability statistics, validity, responsiveness, clinical trials, patient-reported outcome measures
MeSH terms
Cross-Cultural Comparison, Health Surveys, Humans, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review