The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Joint analysis of three U.S. community intervention trials for reduction of cardiovascular disease risk
Open accessAbstract
During the 1980s three comprehensive community-based heart disease prevention trials were conducted in the United States. The Stanford Five-City Project, Minnesota Heart Health Program, and Pawtucket Heart Health Program involved 12 cities; six received a 5-8 year multifactorial risk reduction program. This analysis pools data from the three studies to delineate the common intervention effects with greater sample size and power than could be attained by the single studies. Time trends were estimated for cigarette smoking, blood pressure, total cholesterol, body mass index, and coronary heart disease mortality risk in women and men aged 25-64 years. The joint estimates of intervention effect were in the expected direction in nine of 12 gender-specific comparisons; however, these were not statistically significant. The results illustrate the analytic challenges of evaluating community-based prevention trials and point to the smaller than expected net differences, rather than small sample size, as the reason for few statistically significant effects in the three U.S. prevention trials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In contrast, similar media and education strategies in the Minnesota Heart Health Program and the Pawtucket Heart Health Program did not lead to significant improvements in cardiovascular risk factors or events when compared with control communities.61–63”
From Population Approaches to Improve Diet, Physical Activity, and Smoking Habits: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2012) · cites this paper as [62]
In the citing paper
“In the latter studies, secular improvements in risk factors were also seen in the control communities, perhaps in response to similar national campaigns targeting these risk factors; these trends may have limited detection of any added effects of the community-level interventions.”
From Population Approaches to Improve Diet, Physical Activity, and Smoking Habits: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2012) · cites this paper as [62]
In the citing paper
“These interventions produced mixed results, with benefits on risk factors seen in 1 study49 but without clear benefits in the other 2 studies, as compared with secular trends.61,62”
From Population Approaches to Improve Diet, Physical Activity, and Smoking Habits: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2012) · cites this paper as [62]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kytle, J., & Bandura, A. (1978) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2065952 · Cited by 25,422
Social Marketing: An Approach to Planned Social Change
Kotler, P., & Zaltman, G. (1971) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1249783 · Cited by 2,855
Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial
Michel, D. (1982) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1982.03330120023025 · Cited by 2,211
Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents (1967) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.202.11.1028 · Cited by 1,316
The Pooling Project Research Group (1978) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(78)90073-5 · Cited by 994
Lipid Research Clinics Program
Renfrew, R. A. (1984) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1984.03350180015009 · Cited by 829
Public Communication Campaigns
Rice, R. E., & Atkin, C. K. (2001) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781452233260 · Cited by 764
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Greiser, 1993, Risk factor trends and cardiovascular mortality risk after 3.5 years of community-based intervention in the German Cardiovascular Prevention Study, Ann Epidemiol, 3, S13
- Lasater, 1994, Secular trends through the 1980's for CVD risk factors, Circulation, 89, 2
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The (mis)estimation of neighborhood effects: causal inference for a practicable social epidemiology
Oakes, J. M. (2003) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.08.004 · Cited by 772
Reconsidering Community-Based Health Promotion: Promise, Performance, and Potential
Merzel, C., & D’Afflitti, J. (2003) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.93.4.557 · Cited by 713
Mozaffarian, D., Afshin, A., Benowitz, N. L., Bittner, V., Daniels, S. R., Franch, H. A., Jacobs, D. R., Kraus, W. E., Kris-Etherton, P. M., Krummel, D. A., et al. (2012) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e318260a20b · Cited by 601
Ethnic and Socioeconomic Differences in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors
Winkleby, M. A., KRAEMER, H. C., Ahn, D. K., & Varady, A. N. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.280.4.356 · Cited by 558
Self-citationWang, M. C., Kim, S., Gonzalez, A. A., MacLeod, K. E., & Winkleby, M. A. (2007) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.2006.051680 · Cited by 369
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Winkleby, M. A., Feldman, H. A., & Murray, D. M.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Corresponding author
- Winkleby, Marilyn A.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-06
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 645-658
- ISSN
- 0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2099139180
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 9.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01hl023629-15, 5r01hl025523-13, 5r01hl021906-19)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL-23629, HL21906, HL 25523)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Healthcare Systems and Public Health
- Keywords
- cardiovascular disease prevention, community-based intervention, pooled analysis, smoking, blood pressure, total cholesterol, body mass index, coronary heart disease mortality, middle-aged adults, intervention effect estimation, temporal trends
- MeSH terms
- Blood Pressure, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cholesterol, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Education, Humans, Male, Risk, Risk Factors, Smoking, Socioeconomic Factors, Time Factors, United States, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Body Mass Index, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
