Cited by 105Health Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsHealthcare Systems and Public Health

Community Education for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: Morbidity and Mortality Results from the Minnesota Heart Health Program

Luepker, R. V., Rastam, L., Hannan, P. J., Murray, D. M., Gray, C., Baker, W. L., Crow, R., Jacobs, D. R. +4 more·1996·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

The Minnesota Heart Health Program was a community trial of cardiovascular disease prevention methods that was conducted from 1980 to 1990 in three Upper Midwestern communities with three matched comparison communities. A 5- to 6-year intervention program used community-wide and individual health education in an attempt to decrease population risk. A major hypothesis was that the incidence of validated fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease and stroke in 30- to 74-year-old men and women would decline differentially in the education communities after the health promotion program was introduced. This hypothesis was investigated using mixed-model regression. The intervention effect was modeled as a series of annual departures from a linear secular trend after a 2-year lag from the start of the intervention program. In the education communities, 2,394 cases of coronary heart disease and 818 cases of stroke occurred, with 2,526 and 739 cases, respectively, being seen in the comparison communities. The overall decline in coronary heart disease incidence was 1.8 percent per year in men (p = 0.03) and 3.6 percent per year in women (p = 0.007). For stroke, there were no significant secular trends. The authors recently published findings showing minimal effects of sustained intervention on risk factor levels. In the current report, there was no evidence of a significant intervention effect on morbidity or mortality, either for coronary heart disease or for stroke.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008936

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Similar media and education strategies in the Minnesota Heart Health Program and the Pawtucket Heart Health Program did not lead to significant improvements in cardiovascular risk factors or events when compared with control communities.

    “In contrast, similar media and education strategies in the Minnesota Heart Health Program and the Pawtucket Heart Health Program did not lead to significant improvements in cardiovascular risk factors or events when compared with control communities.61–63”
  • In the Minnesota and Pawtucket studies, secular improvements in risk factors were also seen in the control communities, perhaps in response to similar national campaigns targeting these risk factors; these trends may have limited detection of any added effects of the community-level interventions.

    “In the latter studies, secular improvements in risk factors were also seen in the control communities, perhaps in response to similar national campaigns targeting these risk factors; these trends may have limited detection of any added effects of the community-level interventions.”
  • Intensive community-level media and education interventions that targeted physical activity as part of a comprehensive set of health factors and behaviors produced mixed results, with benefits on risk factors in 1 study but no clear benefits in the other 2 studies compared with secular trends.

    “These interventions produced mixed results, with benefits on risk factors seen in 1 study49 but without clear benefits in the other 2 studies, as compared with secular trends.61,62”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luepker, R. V., Rastam, L., Hannan, P. J., Murray, D. M., Gray, C., Baker, W. L., Crow, R., Jacobs, D. R., Pirie, P. L., Mascioli, S. R., Mittelmark, M. B., & Blackburn, H.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1996-08-15
Volume
144
Issue
4
Pages
351-362
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2071078087
Cited by
105
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01hl025523-13)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01-HL 25523)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Healthcare Systems and Public Health
Keywords
cardiovascular disease prevention, community health education, coronary heart disease incidence, stroke incidence, health promotion interventions, secular trends, intervention effects, risk factor reduction, community-based trial
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Community Health Services, Female, Health Education, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Minnesota, Population Surveillance, Risk Factors, Rural Health, Urban Health, Incidence, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review