The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of Repetition and Competition on Activity in Left Prefrontal Cortex during Word Generation
Open accessAbstract
Neuroimaging studies have revealed an association between word generation and activity in the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) that is attentuated with item repetition. The experiment reported here examined the effects of repeated word generation, under conditions in which completion was either decreased or increased, on activity measured during whole-brain echoplanar functional magnetic resonance imaging. Activity in left IFG decreased during repetition conditions that reduced competition but increased during repetition conditions that increased competition; this pattern was contrasted to repetition effects observed in other cortical areas, specifically regions of left temporal cortex. The increase in left IFG activity, which is not predicted by a simple semantic retrieval account of prefrontal function, is consistent with the hypothesis that left IFG subserves the selection of semantic knowledge among competing alternatives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Practice-related Changes in Human Brain Functional Anatomy during Nonmotor Learning
Raichle, M. E., Fiez, J. A., Videen, T. O., MacLeod, A.-M. K., Pardo, J. V., Fox, P. T., & Petersen, S. E. (1994) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/4.1.8 · Cited by 1,593
Troyer, A. K., Moscovitch, M., & Winocur, G. (1997) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/0894-4105.11.1.138 · Cited by 1,241
Word recognition in the human inferior temporal lobe
Nobre, A. C., Allison, T., & McCarthy, G. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/372260a0 · Cited by 789
Thompson-Schill, S. L., Swick, D., Farah, M. J., D’Esposito, M., Kan, I. P., & Knight, R. T. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.26.15855 · Cited by 488 · cited 3×
“The experiment reported here examined the selection demands (Thompson-Schill et al., 1998).”
BackgroundResultThe neural substrates underlying word generation: A bilingual functional-imaging study
Klein, D., Milner, B., Zatorre, R. J., Meyer, E., & Evans, A. C. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.7.2899 · Cited by 457
Letter and category fluency in patients with frontal lobe lesions.
Baldo, J. V., & Shimamura, A. P. (1998) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037//0894-4105.12.2.259 · Cited by 285
Cited by
Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L. (2009) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp055 · Cited by 4,060
Price, C. J. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.062 · Cited by 2,159
Left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and the cognitive control of memory
Badre, D., & Wagner, A. D. (2007) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.06.015 · Cited by 1,471
On Broca, brain, and binding: A new framework
Hagoort, P. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.004 · Cited by 1,411
Semantic memory and the brain: structure and processes
Martin, A., & Chao, L. L. (2001) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00196-3 · Cited by 1,339
Metadata
- Authors
- Thompson-Schill, S. L., D'Esposito, M., & Kan, I. P.
- Venue
- Neuron
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 513-522
- ISSN
- 0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2132319307
- Cited by
- 546
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 6.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
