The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of Attention on the Reliability of Individual Neurons in Monkey Visual Cortex
Open accessAbstract
To determine the physiological mechanisms underlying the enhancement of performance by attention, we examined how attention affects the ability of isolated neurons to discriminate orientation by investigating the reliability of responses with and without attention. Recording from 262 neurons in cortical area V4 while two rhesus macaques did a delayed match-to-sample task with oriented stimuli, we found that attention did not produce detectable changes in the variability of neuronal responses but did improve the orientation discriminability of the neurons. We also found that attention did not change the relationship between burst rate and response rate. Our results are consistent with the idea that attention selects groups of neurons for a multiplicative enhancement in response strength.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Attentional modulation of neural gain has been particularly well studied in the non-human primate visual system1,42,43, in which visual spatial attention within the receptive field of a recorded neuron enhances both contrast gain (that is, scaling of that neuron’s stimulus-response relationship along the contrast axis)43 and response gain (that is, multiplicative transformation of responses to all”
From Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex (2020) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“Neurons in many cortical and subcortical brain areas exhibit robust gain modulation that may contribute to multiple cognitive functions, including attention, learning, sensory processing and multimodal integration1–3,7,8,13–17.”
From Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex (2020) · cites this paper as [14]
Citations
Cites
Baltosser, W. H., & Zar, J. H. (1996) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/2265725 · Cited by 35,166
(1966) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,293
Signal detection theory and psychophysics
Ingleby, D. (1967) · Journal of Sound and Vibration · doi:10.1016/0022-460x(67)90197-6 · Cited by 8,616
Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205 · Cited by 8,388
Visual Feature Integration and the Temporal Correlation Hypothesis
Singer, W., & Gray, C. M. (1995) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.003011 · Cited by 3,217
Selective Attention Gates Visual Processing in the Extrastriate Cortex
Moran, J., & Desimone, R. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.4023713 · Cited by 2,433
Shadlen, M. N., & Newsome, W. T. (1998) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.18-10-03870.1998 · Cited by 2,178
Selective Attention Gates Visual Processing in the Extrastriate Cortex
Moran, J., & Desimone, R. (2003) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2834.003.0024 · Cited by 2,164
Softky, W., & Koch, C. (1993) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.13-01-00334.1993 · Cited by 1,689
Noise, neural codes and cortical organization
Shadlen, M. N., & Newsome, W. T. (1994) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/0959-4388(94)90059-0 · Cited by 1,255
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How does the brain solve visual object recognition?
DiCarlo, J. J., Zoccolan, D., & Rust, N. C. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.01.010 · Cited by 1,790
Neurophysiological and Computational Principles of Cortical Rhythms in Cognition
Wang, X.-J. (2010) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00035.2008 · Cited by 1,939
Neural correlations, population coding and computation
Averbeck, B. B., Latham, P. E., & Pouget, A. (2006) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1888 · Cited by 1,743
Thut, G., Nietzel, A., Brandt, S., & Pascual-Leone, Á. (2006) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0875-06.2006 · Cited by 1,662
A taxonomy of external and internal attention.
Chun, M. M., Golomb, J. D., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2011) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100427 · Cited by 1,472
Metadata
- Authors
- McAdams, C. J., & Maunsell, J. H. R.
- Affiliations
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Maunsell, John H.R.
- Venue
- Neuron
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-08
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 765-773
- ISSN
- 0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2139326454
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 6.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Neuron (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Eye Institute (R01 EY-05911, T32 EY07001, T32EY007001, R01EY005911)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007330, T32GM-07330)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Keywords
- visual attention, orientation discrimination, area V4, rhesus monkeys, neuronal response variability, burst firing, response rate, delayed matching-to-sample
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Attention, Discrimination, Psychological, Electrophysiology, Macaca mulatta, Microelectrodes, Neurons, Orientation, Psychomotor Performance, Time Factors, Visual Cortex, Visual Fields
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
