Cited by 18Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsRelativity and Gravitational Theory

Quantum gravity as a “sum over surfaces”

Rovelli, C.·1997·Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0920-5632(97)00351-4

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • From loop quantum gravity and other approaches, the N_i's are naturally related to the area of the faces, and their intertwiner to the volume.

    “indeed, we know from loop quantum gravity [3,29] and from other approaches [21], that the N i 's are naturally related to the area of the faces, and their intertwiner to the volume.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rovelli, C.
Venue
Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-08
Volume
57
Issue
1-3
Pages
28-43
ISSN
0920-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082452786
Cited by
18
References
7
Citations by year
2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
quantum gravity, loop representation, string theory, topological field theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review