CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 354Mental Health Treatment and AccessSchizophrenia research and treatmentPsychology and Mental Health

Familiarity with mental illness and social distance from people with schizophrenia and major depression: testing a model using data from a representative population survey

Angermeyer, Matthias C, Matschinger, Herbert, Corrigan, Patrick W·2004·Schizophrenia Research
DOI 10.1016/s0920-9964(03)00186-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objectives The main purpose of this study is to examine whether the relationship between familiarity with mental illness and stigmatizing attitudes about mental illness, which had been observed in a previous study based on a sample of community college students (Psychiatr. Serv. 52 (2001) 953), can be replicated using data from a representative population survey.Methods In spring 2001, a representative survey was carried out in Germany (n=5025). A personal, fully structured interview was conducted which began with the presentation of a vignette depicting someone with either schizophrenia or major depression. Respondents were asked to respond to measures assessing familiarity, perception of dangerousness, fear, and social distance. Path analysis with manifest variable structural modeling techniques was applied to test the model used in the previous study.Results Despite differences in methods, most findings of the previous study were replicated. Respondents who were familiar with mental illness were less likely to believe that people with schizophrenia or major depression are dangerous. Weaker perceptions of dangerousness corresponded closely with less fear of such people, which in turn was associated with less social distance. The effect of familiarity was somewhat pervasive: respondents who reported to be familiar with mental illness expressed a less strong desire for social distance. There is also a relatively strong relationship between perceived dangerousness and social distance.Conclusions Our findings fully support the notion that approaches to social change which increase the public's familiarity with mental illness will decrease stigma.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0920-9964(03)00186-5

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Angermeyer, M. C., Matschinger, H., & Corrigan, P. W.
Affiliations
  • Leipzig University (DE)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Corrigan, Patrick W
ORCID
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-08
Volume
69
Issue
2-3
Pages
175-182
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0920-9964(03)00186-5
OpenAlex
W1967312889
Cited by
354
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 21
FWCI
7.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
mental health stigma
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Major Depressive Disorder, Fear, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Population Surveillance, Research Design, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Psychological Distance, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review