The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advances in comparative protein-structure modelling
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new approach to protein fold recognition
Jones, D. T., Taylort, W. R., & Thornton, J. M. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/358086a0 · Cited by 1,221
Topology fingerprint approach to the inverse protein folding problem
Godzik, A., Kolinski, A., & Skolnick, J. (1992) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(92)90693-e · Cited by 339
Comparison of systematic search and database methods for constructing segments of protein structure
Fidelis, K., Stern, P. S., Bacon, D., & Moult, J. (1994) · "Protein Engineering, Design and Selection" · doi:10.1093/protein/7.8.953 · Cited by 126
Cited by
Comparative Protein Structure Modeling of Genes and Genomes
Martí-Renom, M. A., Stuart, A. C., Fiser, A., Sánchez, R., Melo, F., & Šali, A. (2000) · Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.29.1.291 · Cited by 3,169
Self-citationModeling of loops in protein structures
Fiser, A., Do, R. K. G., & Šali, A. (2000) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.9.9.1753 · Cited by 2,116
Self-citationComparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER
Webb, B., & Sali, A. (2016) · Current Protocols in Protein Science · doi:10.1002/cpps.20 · Cited by 730
“The simultaneous use of several templates can minimize this kind of error (Srinivasan and Blundell, 1993; Sanchez and Sali, 1997a, 1997b).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLarge-scale protein structure modeling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome
Sánchez, R., & Sali, A. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.23.13597 · Cited by 362
Self-citationProtein-Protein Docking: From Interaction to Interactome
Vakser, I. A. (2014) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2014.08.033 · Cited by 318
Metadata
- Authors
- Sánchez, R., & Šali, A.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Structural Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-04
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 206-214
- ISSN
- 0959-440X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2051831487
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 1.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
