Cited by 216Optimism, Hope, and Well-beingCancer survivorship and careHead and Neck Cancer Studies

Dispositional Optimism Predicts Survival Status 1 Year After Diagnosis in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

Allison, Paul J., Guichard, Christophe, Fung, Karen, Gilain, Laurent·2003·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that, independent of other known prognostic factors, pessimistic head and neck (H&N) cancer patients have a greater risk of being dead 1 year after diagnosis than do optimistic patients. Patients and Methods: A prospective observational study design was used with a cohort of H&N cancer patients diagnosed during the period from March 1, 1997, to August 31, 1998, at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Clermont-Ferrand, France. Dispositional optimism (DO) was evaluated at baseline using a French version of the Life Orientation Test translated and validated for this study. One-year survival status was collected on all subjects. The analysis of the hypothesized association between DO and 1-year survival was performed using multiple logistic regression analysis, controlling for other sociodemographic and clinical variables. Results: The sample size was 101 patients, representing all but one of those patients fitting the inclusion criteria who were diagnosed during the recruitment period. Of these, 51 were alive at 1 year after diagnosis, 45 were dead, and five were lost to follow-up. The multivariate analysis was performed on the data from the 96 subjects in whom 1-year survival status was known. Controlling for known predictors of H&N cancer survival, pessimistic subjects (odds ratio [OR], 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 1.24) and those living alone (OR, 4.14; 95% CI, 1.21 to 14.17) were more likely than optimistic subjects and those living with others to be dead at 1 year. Conclusion: The results of this study of a cohort of French H&N cancer patients indicate that dispositional optimism predicts 1-year survival independent of other sociodemographic and clinical variables.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2003.10.092

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Allison, P. J., Guichard, C., Fung, K., & Gilain, L.
Affiliations
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand (FR)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2003-02-01
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
543-548
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2050608886
Cited by
216
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
FWCI
11.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Keywords
dispositional optimism, pessimism, head and neck cancer, survival after cancer diagnosis, prognostic factors, Life Orientation Test, living alone, sociodemographic factors, one-year mortality
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude to Health, Female, France, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Self Concept, Survival, Cohort Studies, Odds Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review