Cited by 586

MicroRNAs and Other Tiny Endogenous RNAs in C. elegans

Ambros, Victor, Lee, Rosalind C., Lavanway, Ann, Williams, Peter T., Jewell, David·2003·Current Biology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00287-2

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many tiny noncoding RNA molecules that are not processed from a miRNA-like hairpin precursor and are not phylogenetically conserved have been recently cloned from C. elegans and are likely to be expressed in vertebrates as well.

    “In addition, many tiny noncoding RNA molecules that are not processed from a miRNA-like hairpin precursor and are not phylogenetically conserved have been recently cloned from C. elegans and likely to express in vertebrates as well (Ambros et al. 2003).”
  • The small RNA referred to as miR-271 does not fulfill the stringent criteria for miRNA suggested by Ambros et al. (2003).

    “The small RNA referred to as miR-271 does not fulfill the stringent criteria for miRNA suggested by Ambros et al. (2003).”

    From A microRNA array reveals extensive regulation of microRNAs during brain development (2003) · cites this paper as Ambros et al. (2003)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [1]1. Ambros, V. microRNAstiny regulators with great potential Cell. 2001; 107:823-826 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (1521) PubMed Google Scholar
  2. [2]2. Pasquinelli, A.E. ∙ Ruvkun, G. Control of developmental timing by microRNAs and their targets Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2002; 18:495-513 Crossref Scopus (293) PubMed Google Scholar
  3. [3]3. Grishok, A. ∙ Pasquinelli, A.E. ∙ Conte, D. ... Genes and mechanisms related to RNA interference regulate expression of the small temporal RNAs that control C. elegans developmental timing Cell. 2001; 106:23-34 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (1578) PubMed Google Scholar
  4. [4]4. Hutvagner, G. ∙ McLachlan, J. ∙ Pasquinelli, A.E. ... A cellular function for the RNA-interference enzyme Dicer in the maturation of the let-7 small temporal RNA Science. 2001; 293:834-838 Crossref Scopus (2258) PubMed Google Scholar
  5. [5]5. Ketting, R.F. ∙ Fischer, S.E. ∙ Bernstein, E. ... Dicer functions in RNA interference and in synthesis of small RNA involved in developmental timing in C. elegans Genes Dev. 2001; 15:2654-2659 Crossref Scopus (1505) PubMed Google Scholar

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ambros, V., Lee, R. C., Lavanway, A., Williams, P. T., & Jewell, D.
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-05
Volume
13
Issue
10
Pages
807-818
ISSN
0960-9822
Cited by
586
References
3
Language
en
Funders
National Institutes of Health (GM34028)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review