Cited by 136Skin Protection and AgingNonmelanoma Skin Cancer StudiesAtmospheric Ozone and Climate

Ultraviolet radiation and skin cancer of humans

Urbach, Frederick·1997·Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology

Abstract

Current scientific evidence indicates that stratospheric ozone has declined worldwide over the past 20 years. The trend estimates are markedly dependent on the geographical location and are highly seasonal. Winter trends are much more negative than those for summer and autumn. Projections based on current assumptions of chlorine release suggest that this decline will continue into the next century. On the basis of the decrease in ozone over the mid-latitudes, an increase in biologically effective ultraviolet radiation (UVR) of 4%-9% is expected, depending on the season and geographical location. However, the UVR penetration to the Earth's surface is greatly affected by clouds, aerosols and tropospheric ozone, and current increases, if any, have not been as large as this. Direct evidence for the induction of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) due to UVR has been derived from animal experiments in mice and rats. Numerous epidemiological data confirm that this relationship also holds for human skin. The increase in NMSC incidence in the past two decades is not likely to be due to the decrease in ozone, given the long latency (two to three decades) associated with UVR effects on skin. A knowledge of the action spectrum for NMSC development suggests that a 1% depletion in stratospheric ozone may be expected to increase NMSC, at equilibrium, by about 2.0% The evidence on the role of UVR exposure in the development of malignant melanoma (MM) is less certain. It has been estimated that a 1% reduction in ozone may cause an increase in MM of 0.6%.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1011-1344(97)00029-8

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The incidence of infectious skin disease has been shifting due to climate conditions that favor the transmission of microbes, and global skin cancer risk is rising due to ozone layer depletion.

    “The incidence of infectious skin disease has been shifting due to climate conditions that favor the transmission of microbes, and global skin cancer risk is rising due to ozone layer depletion [98,99,100,101].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Urbach, F.
Corresponding author
Urbach, Frederick
Venue
Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-08
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
3-7
ISSN
1011-1344 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080752514
Cited by
136
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
8.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
Keywords
ultraviolet radiation, skin cancer, stratospheric ozone depletion, non-melanoma skin cancer, melanoma, chlorine release, tropospheric ozone, action spectrum
MeSH terms
Animals, Forecasting, Humans, Melanoma, Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced, Ozone, Seasons, Skin Neoplasms, Sunlight, Ultraviolet Rays, Incidence, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review