CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,086Atmospheric Ozone and ClimateAtmospheric aerosols and cloudsAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 134 of the 139 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Changes in biologically active ultraviolet radiation reaching the Earth's surface

Madronich, S., McKenzie, R.L., Björn, L.O., Caldwell, M.M.·1998·Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology
DOI 10.1016/s1011-1344(98)00182-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Stratospheric ozone levels are near their lowest point since measurements began, so current ultraviolet-B (UV-B) radiation levels are thought to be close to their maximum. Total stratospheric content of ozone-depleting substances is expected to reach a maximum before the year 2000. All other things being equal, the current ozone losses and related UV-B increases should be close to their maximum. Increases in surface erythemal (sunburning) UV radiation relative to the values in the 1970s are estimated to be: about 7% at Northern Hemisphere mid-latitudes in winter/spring; about 4% at Northern Hemisphere mid-latitudes in summer/fall; about 6% at Southern Hemisphere mid-latitudes on a year-round basis; about 130% in the Antarctic in spring; and about 22% in the Arctic in spring. Reductions in atmospheric ozone are expected to result in higher amounts of UV-B radiation reaching the Earth's surface. The expected correlation between increases in surface UV-B radiation and decreases in overhead ozone has been further demonstrated and quantified by ground-based instruments under a wide range of conditions. Improved measurements of UV-B radiation are now providing better geographical and temporal coverage. Surface UV-B radiation levels are highly variable because of cloud cover, and also because of local effects including pollutants and surface reflections. These factors usually decrease atmospheric transmission and therefore the surface irradiances at UV-B as well as other wavelengths. Occasional cloud-induced increases have also been reported. With a few exceptions, the direct detection of UV-B trends at low- and mid-latitudes remains problematic due to this high natural variability, the relatively small ozone changes, and the practical difficulties of maintaining long-term stability in networks of UV-measuring instruments. Few reliable UV-B radiation measurements are available from pre-ozone-depletion days. Satellite-based observations of atmospheric ozone and clouds are being used, together with models of atmospheric transmission, to provide global coverage and long-term estimates of surface UV-B radiation. Estimates of long-term (1979-1992) trends in zonally averaged UV irradiances that include cloud effects are nearly identical to those for clear-sky estimates, providing evidence that clouds have not influenced the UV-B trends. However, the limitations of satellite-derived UV estimates should be recognized. To assess uncertainties inherent in this approach, additional validations involving comparisons with ground-based observations are required. Direct comparisons of ground-based UV-B radiation measurements between a few mid-latitude sites in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres have shown larger differences than those estimated using satellite data. Ground-based measurements show that summertime erythemal UV irradiances in the Southern Hemisphere exceed those at comparable latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere by up to 40%, whereas corresponding satellite-based estimates yield only 10-15% differences. Atmospheric pollution may be a factor in this discrepancy between ground-based measurements and satellite-derived estimates. UV-B measurements at more sites are required to determine whether the larger observed differences are globally representative. High levels of UV-B radiation continue to be observed in Antarctica during the recurrent spring-time ozone hole. For example, during ozone-hole episodes, measured biologically damaging radiation at Palmer Station, Antarctica (64 degrees S) has been found to approach and occasionally even exceed maximum summer values at San Diego, CA, USA (32 degrees N). Long-term predictions of future UV-B levels are difficult and uncertain. Nevertheless, current best estimates suggest that a slow recovery to pre-ozone depletion levels may be expected during the next half-century. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1011-1344(98)00182-1

Cites

134 of 134 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 139 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Bodhaine, 1997, Spectral UV measurements at Mauna Loa: July 1995–July 1996, J. Geophys. Res., 23, 2121
  2. 1992, ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental and Industrial Hygienists), 1991–1992 Threshold Limit Values
  3. Kjeldstad, 1997, The Nordic intercomparison of ultraviolet and total ozone instruments at Iana, October 1996, final report, Finnish Meteorological Institute Report No. 36
  4. Webb, 1997, Advances in solar ultraviolet spectroradiometry, European Commission Air Pollution Research Report 63
  5. Josefsson, 1986, Solar ultraviolet radiation in Sweden, National Institute of Radiation Protection in Stockholm, SMHI Report-53

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Madronich, S., McKenzie, R. L., Björn, L. O., & Caldwell, M. M.
Affiliations
  • NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US)
  • National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NZ)
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Utah State University (US)
Corresponding author
Madronich, S.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-10
Volume
46
Issue
1-3
Pages
5-19
ISSN
1011-1344 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s1011-1344(98)00182-1
OpenAlex
W2073142030
Cited by
1,086
References
139
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 53
FWCI
24.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Keywords
UV-B radiation, stratospheric ozone depletion, cloud effects on UV, atmospheric transmission model, ozone-depleting substances, ground-based UV measurements, cloud cover variability
MeSH terms
Humans, Ultraviolet Rays, Earth, Planet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review