The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nanoelectrospray—More than just a minimized-flow electrospray ionization source
Abstract
The comparison between electrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectra from NaCl solutions with and without analyte obtained under ionspray and nanospray conditions reveals different mass spectral behavior of the two ESI techniques. This can be attributed to the different initial droplet sizes which are in the microns range for ionspray, while in nanospray they are believed to be about one order of magnitude smaller. In the context of the widely accepted uneven-fission model, nanospray would then enter one fission generation later; in addition, a higher initial droplet surface charge density in nanospray results in early fissions without extensive evaporation and thus increase in sample and salt concentration. This rationalizes that ionspray spectra closely resemble nanospray spectra from solutions with about one order of magnitude higher salt concentrations, showing a higher tolerance of nanospray towards salt contamination. When the analyte is a peptide (in a solution containing a high molar surplus of salt), molecule ion formation effectively competes with salt cluster ion formation; when the analyte is a sugar, it is detectable beside a high salt concentration only with nanospray, indicating the supporting effect of surface activity on ion release in the case of peptides. A model is presented which explains the different mass spectral behaviour of ionspray and nanospray by suggesting different "predominant fission pathways" depending on the size of the initial droplets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics
(2014) · doi:10.1201/b17118 · Cited by 57,706
Cited by
Electrospray: From ions in solution to ions in the gas phase, what we know now
Kebarle, P., & Verkerk, U. H. (2009) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.20247 · Cited by 905
Best practices and benchmarks for intact protein analysis for top-down mass spectrometry
Donnelly, D. P., Rawlins, C. M., DeHart, C. J., Fornelli, L., Schachner, L. F., Lin, Z., Lippens, J. L., Aluri, K. C., Sarin, R., Chen, B., et al. (2019) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0457-0 · Cited by 377
Haselberg, R., de Jong, G. J., & Somsen, G. W. (2013) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac303158f · Cited by 149
Kammeijer, G. S. M., Kohler, I., Jansen, B. C., Hensbergen, P. J., Mayboroda, O. A., Falck, D., & Wuhrer, M. (2016) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.6b00479 · Cited by 74
Evaluation of a sheathless nanospray interface based on a porous tip sprayer for CE‐ESI‐MS coupling
Bonvin, G., Veuthey, J., Rudaz, S., & Schappler, J. (2012) · ELECTROPHORESIS · doi:10.1002/elps.201100461 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Juraschek, R., Dülcks, T., & Karas, M.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1999-04-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 300-308
- ISSN
- 1044-0305 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1995070541
- Cited by
- 415
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nanoelectrospray—More than just a minimized-flow electrospray ionization source. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1044-0305(98)00157-3
- The paper
- Juraschek, R., Dülcks, T., & Karas, M. (1999). Nanoelectrospray—More than just a minimized-flow electrospray ionization source. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1044-0305(98)00157-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.