Self-esteem and mortality: prospective evidence from a population-based study
Open accessAbstract
Purpose Self-esteem is considered to be importantly associated with both psychosocial states such as depression as well as physical health. There are no population-based studies that examine the association between self-esteem and mortality. The objective of this study was to assess whether low self-esteem was prospectively associated with increased risk of death in a population-based sample of Finnish men. Methods A sample of 2682 male residents of Kuopio, Finland were interviewed and followed prospectively as part of the Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study (KIHD). Characteristics of the KIHD sample at baseline included self-esteem, measured by the Rosenberg ten-item scale, socioeconomic factors, behavioral risk factors, other psychosocial characteristics, and prevalent diseases. Mortality was ascertained through linkage to the Finnish national death registry. We assessed the relationship between self-esteem and all-cause mortality using Cox proportional hazards models. Results Low self-esteem was associated with a two-fold [hazard ratio (HR)=2.0, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.3-3.2] increase in age-adjusted mortality. This relationship was partially explained by behavioral and socioeconomic factors, and prevalent diseases, and fully explained by other psychosocial characteristics (hopelessness, depression, cynical hostility, and sullenness). When adjusted for hopelessness alone there was no increased risk associated with low self-esteem (HR=1.3, 95% CI=0.8-2.2). Conclusions This study found no association between self-esteem and all-cause mortality after adjustment for other psychosocial characteristics, primarily hopelessness. Our understanding of the observed relationships between some psychosocial factors and mortality may be improved by simultaneous measurement of multiple psychosocial domains, thus diminishing the potential for residual confounding.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
At least two studies have noted some confounding between SES and Neuroticism, such that some socioeconomic inequalities in mortality rate can be explained by higher Neuroticism in disadvantaged social environments.
“Finally, at least two studies have noted some confounding between socioeconomic status (SES) and Neuroticism, such that some of the socioeconomic inequalities in mortality rate can actually be explained by the fact that persons in more disadvantaged social environments are prone to higher Neuroticism [62, 113].”
From Personality and Longevity: Knowns, Unknowns, and Implications for Public Health and Personalized Medicine (2011) · cites this paper as [113]
Several studies have linked higher Neuroticism to all-cause mortality in general populations from the US, Finland, and the United Kingdom over as long a follow-up period as 50 years.
“Several studies have linked higher Neuroticism to all-cause mortality in general populations from the US [62], Finland [113], and the United Kingdom [80, 81] over as long a follow-up period as 50 years [88, 113], as well as in an older twin sample [87].”
From Personality and Longevity: Knowns, Unknowns, and Implications for Public Health and Personalized Medicine (2011) · cites this paper as [113]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Everson, S. A., Kauhanen, J., Kaplan, G. A., Goldberg, D. E., Julkunen, J., Tuomilehto, J., & Salonen, J. T. (1997) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009245 · Cited by 301 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The final score was a sum of the responses from each item in the scale, which ranged from 1 = hardly ever to 4 = almost always, and was subsequently categorized into tertiles (29).”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chapman, B. P., Roberts, B., & Duberstein, P. (2011) · Journal of Aging Research · doi:10.4061/2011/759170 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
“Finally, at least two studies have noted some confounding between socioeconomic status (SES) and Neuroticism, such that some of the socioeconomic inequalities in mortality rate can actually be explained by the fact that persons in more disadvantaged social environments are prone to higher Neuroticism [62, 113].”
BackgroundPositive affect uniquely predicts lower risk of mortality in people with diabetes.
Moskowitz, J. T., Epel, E. S., & Acree, M. (2008) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.27.1.s73 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Self-esteem levels and cardiovascular and inflammatory responses to acute stress.
O’Donnell, K., Brydon, L., Wright, C. E., & Steptoe, A. (2008) · Brain, Behavior, and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2008.06.012 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Stress, psychological resources, and HPA and inflammatory reactivity during late adolescence
Chiang, J. J., Ko, A., Bower, J. E., Taylor, S. E., Irwin, M. R., & Fuligni, A. J. (2019) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579418000287 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Feeling Loved: A novel brief self-report health measure
Barrett, B., Muller, D., Hayer, S., Ewers, T., Chase, J., Barnet, J. H., & Brown, R. (2019) · EXPLORE · doi:10.1016/j.explore.2018.07.005 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Stamatakis, K. A., Lynch, J., Everson, S. A., Raghunathan, T., Salonen, J. T., & Kaplan, G. A.
- Affiliations
- Rush University Medical Center (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stamatakis, Katherine A
- Venue
- Annals of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 58-65
- ISSN
- 1047-2797 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3173508
- OpenAlex
- W2031111038
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Annals of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD047861)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Keywords
- self-esteem, mortality, all-cause mortality, hopelessness, depression, cynical hostility, psychosocial factors, residual confounding, men
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cause of Death, Finland, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Registries, Risk Factors, Self Concept, Smoking, Socioeconomic Factors, Exercise, Body Mass Index, Proportional Hazards Models, Survival Analysis, Myocardial Ischemia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review