Cited by 93Health Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionPrimary Care and Health OutcomesWomen's cancer prevention and management

Are two doctors better than one? Women’s physician use and appropriate care

Henderson, Jillian T, Weisman, Carol S, Grason, Holly·2002·Women's Health Issues

Abstract

This study examines nonelderly women's concurrent use of two types of physicians (generalists and obstetrician-gynecologists) for regular health care and associations with receipt of preventive care, including a range of recommended screening, counseling, and heart disease prevention services. Data are from the 1999 Women's Health Care Experiences Survey conducted in Baltimore, Maryland, using random digit dialing (N = 509 women ages 18 to 64). Key findings are: 58% of women report using two physicians (a generalist and an ob/gyn) for regular care; seeing both a generalist and an ob/gyn, compared with seeing a generalist alone, is consistently associated with receiving more clinical preventive services, including screening, counseling, and preventive services related to heart disease. Because seeing an ob/gyn in addition to a generalist physician is associated with receiving recommended preventive services (even for heart disease), the findings suggest that non-elderly women who rely on a generalist alone may receive substandard preventive care. The implications for women's access to ob/gyns and for appropriate design of women's primary care are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1049-3867(02)00134-2

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most women recognize the value of optimizing health before pregnancy and most doctors consider preconception care important, yet few obstetrician-gynecologists or family physicians deliver comprehensive preconception care.

    “Although most women understand the importance of optimizing their health before pregnancy and most physicians think PCC is important, few obstetricians/gynecologists or family physicians provide comprehensive PCC to their patients.9, 10”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Henderson, J. T., Weisman, C. S., & Grason, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Women's Health Issues
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-05
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
138-149
ISSN
1049-3867 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2106764053
Cited by
93
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Women s Health Issues (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (U93 MC 00101)
  • National Institute on Aging (T32-AG00134, T32AG000134)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
women's health services, general practitioners, obstetricians and gynecologists, preventive medicine, clinical preventive services, heart disease prevention, screening, counseling
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Family Practice, Female, Heart Diseases, Humans, Middle Aged, Obstetrics, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Preventive Health Services, Socioeconomic Factors, Baltimore, Linear Models, Women's Health, Age Distribution, Health Care Surveys

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review