The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do Secondary L2 Writers Benefit from Peer Comments?
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Studies have found that students prefer teacher feedback compared with peer feedback (Jacobs, Curtis, Braine, & Huang, 1998;Nelson & Carson, 1998;Tsui & Ng, 2000;Zhang, 1995)”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Tsui & Ng, 2000
Citations
Cites
Learner Strategies in Language Learning
Ehrman, M. E., Wenden, A. L., & Rubin, J. (1990) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/328531 · Cited by 1,533
Research on Written Composition: New Directions for Teaching
Witte, S. P., Larson, R. L., & Hillocks, G. (1987) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/357721 · Cited by 694
Second Language Writing. Research Insights for the Classroom.
Kroll, B. (1990) · Modern Language Journal · Cited by 656
Student Reactions to Teacher Response in Multiple‐Draft Composition Classrooms*
Ferris, D. (1995) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587804 · Cited by 630
The influence of teacher commentary on student revision
Ferris, D. R. (1997) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588049 · Cited by 618 · cited 1×
“…university ESL students' first drafts and revised drafts and found that text-specific teacher comments in the form of marginal notes, teacher comments that requested information and clarification, and teacher comments on grammar appeared to induce the most substantive revision (see Ferris, 1997).”
BackgroundSalience of Feedback on Error and Its Effect on EFL Writing Quality
Robb, T., Ross, S. J., & Shortreed, I. (1986) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586390 · Cited by 568
Teacher response to student writing: focus on form versus content
Fathman, A. K., & Whalley, E. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524551.016 · Cited by 460
Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction
Mendonça, C. O., Johnson, K. E., & Mendonca, C. O. (1994) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587558 · Cited by 446
Second language composition instruction: developments, issues, and directions in ESL
Silva, T. J. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524551.005 · Cited by 414
Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class
Zhang, S. (1995) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/1060-3743(95)90010-1 · Cited by 405
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Mittan, 1989, The peer review process: harnessing students' communicative power, 207
- Partridge, K.L. (1981). A comparison of the effectiveness of peer vs. teacher evaluation for helping students of English as a second language to improve the quality of their written compositions. MA Thesis, Department of ESL, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
- Pfeiffer, K. (1981). The effects of peer evaluation and personality on writing anxiety and writing performance in college freshmen. Ed. D. Dissertation, Texas Tech University.
- Pierson, H. (1967). Peer and teacher correction: a comparison of the effects of two methods of teaching composition in grade nine English classes. PhD Dissertation, New York University.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 643
PEER FEEDBACK ON WRITING SKILLS: PERCEPTIONS OF PAKISTANI ESL POSTGRADUATE STUDENTS
Fareed, U. B. J. M. (2021) · Pakistan Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.52337/pjer.v4i1.169 · Cited by 11
Foreword: Multilinguality Across the Curriculum
Hall, J. (2014) · The WAC Clearinghouse; Parlor Press eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2014.0551.1.2 · Cited by 7
Mishra, S. D., Rojewski, J. W., & Rebitch, C. B. (2022) · Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning · doi:10.1016/j.cptl.2022.09.029 · Cited by 5
Chin, C. K., Cheng, G., & Tay, B. P. (2015) · IAFOR Journal of Education · doi:10.22492/ije.3.1.03 · Cited by 6
Online Writing Community: What Can We Learn from Failure?
Tang, E., Cheng, L., & Ng, C. W. (2020) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/0033688220912038 · Cited by 5
“However, as students tend not to perceive themselves as more professional, experienced, and trustworthy than their peers, they tend to value teacher feedback more than peer feedback and incorporate teacher feedback into the revisions of their essays more often (Tsui and Ng, 2000; Yang et al., 2006).”
BackgroundResultPing, A. L., Pin, V. T. P., Wee, S., et al. (2003) · ITL Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.2143/itl.139.0.2003198 · Cited by 5
Hammad, E. A. (2015) · An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities) · doi:10.35552/0247-029-006-007 · Cited by 5
Peer Response in Second Language Writing
Liu, J. (2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0902 · Cited by 5
E-peer feedback training on L2 writing: A case study of inexperienced learners
Do, H. M. (2024) · The JALT CALL Journal · doi:10.29140/jaltcall.v20n1.1242 · Cited by 4
“Peer feedback is a pair or group activity in which students read, evaluate, and comment on each other’s writing (Tsui & Ng, 2000; Zhang & Hyland, 2023).”
BackgroundHuang, B., Xie, S., & Hew, T. K. F. (2026) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2025.2611980 · Cited by 5
Teng, X., & Zhou, X. (2020) · International Journal of Linguistics · doi:10.5296/ijl.v12i4.17376 · Cited by 4
“Many studies showed that peer feedback is beneficial for students to improve their writing quality (Dheram, 1995; Villamil & De Guerrere, 1998; Tsui & Ng 2000).”
BackgroundMamad, A., & Vígh, T. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31694 · Cited by 4
“The present study ’ s findings regarding supportive WF did not echo previous researchers ’ findings (e.g., [28,29,94,95]) that indicated that the majority of students preferred offering and receiving written and oral peer feedback.”
ResultÖzbek, T., Daumiller, M., Roshany-Tabrizi, A., Mömke, T., & Kollar, I. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100540 · Cited by 5
Alharthi, S. M. (2025) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100911 · Cited by 5
Prilop, C. N., Rotsaert, T., & Vanderlinde, R. (2025) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2025.104949 · Cited by 9
Tracing peer feedback to revision process in a wiki supported collaborative writing
Woo, M. M., Chu, S. K. W., & Li, X. (2011) · Cited by 4
Wang, C. (2016) · INTESOL Journal · Cited by 4
The Internet as a Pedagogical Tool in the Writing Process: A Research-Based Approach
Prados, M. D., & Peñuelas, A. B. C. (2017) · English language education · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-68926-5_5 · Cited by 4
Effective Use of Peer-feedback in Developing Academic Writing Skills of Undergraduate Students
Mon, Y. Y., & Zein, S. (2017) · Language Education in Asia · doi:10.5746/leia/17/v8/i2/a04/mon_zein · Cited by 4
“Peer feedback has also been proven useful in increasing insights into writing and revision processes (Peterson, 2003) and raising students’ awareness of audience (Tsui & Ng, 2000), both prompting them to expend more considerable effort on their writing.”
BackgroundResultUsing Peer Review with Greek EFL College Students
Ilkos, M. (2018) · Journal of Academic Writing · doi:10.18552/joaw.v8i2.447 · Cited by 4
“One of the biggest concerns among L2 learners is that their peers are not proficient enough to provide feedback (Tsui and Ng 2000, Rollinson 2005).”
BackgroundIndications of Paired- vs. Grouped-Peer Feedback on Students’ Writing Activities
Tan, L. N., & Ho, P. V. P. (2021) · Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research/Advances in social science, education and humanities research · doi:10.2991/assehr.k.210226.032 · Cited by 5
Collaborative Writing and Peer Feedback Practices Using Google Docs
Damayanti, I. L., Abdurahman, N. H., & Wulandari, L. (2021) · Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research/Advances in social science, education and humanities research · doi:10.2991/assehr.k.210427.034 · Cited by 4
“Therefore, utilizing the peer feedback practices in both ESL and EFL classrooms should be supplemented by the teachers’ feedback (Tsui and Ng, 2000).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHoa, N. T. N., & Lap, T. Q. (2021) · European Journal of Education Studies · doi:10.46827/ejes.v8i10.3926 · Cited by 4
“In a growing body of research that has compared teacher feedback to peer feedback (Tsui & Ng, 2000; Yang et al., 2006), students preferred teacher feedback to peer feedback.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe Effects of Trained Peer Feedback for High School Students
Ho, P. V. P., Le, T. C., Phan, T. H., & Nguyen, N. H. V. (2021) · World Journal of English Language · doi:10.5430/wjel.v12n1p27 · Cited by 4
“Tsui and Ng (2000) have shown that peer comments help students develop an authentic feeling of audience, a sense of ownership over the piece, and a knowledge of their own writing's flaws.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialZhang, Y. (2022) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v15n3p48 · Cited by 4
“In terms of language learning strategies, it could enhance students’ learning autonomy (Tsui & Ng, 2000) and encourage their critical thinking (Berg, 1999).”
BackgroundInfluentialMamad, A., & Vígh, T. (2022) · Journal of language and Education · doi:10.17323/jle.2022.15895 · Cited by 4
“Based on the existing research, exploring teachers’ perceptions can influence their feedback provision on students’ writing and, therefore, the way they perceive revision and effective writing (Min, 2013; Tsui & Ng, 2000).”
Vélez-Palacios, A. A., & Ramírez-Ávila, M. R. (2023) · YUYAY Estrategias Metodologías & Didácticas Educativas · doi:10.59343/yuyay.v1i2.14 · Cited by 4
Yeo, M. A. (2023) · Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1515/cjal-2023-0208 · Cited by 4
Collaborative Feedback in a Blended Learning Environment: A Case Study of an EFL Writing Class
Srijongjai, A. (2013) · Cited by 4
Complementarity of Peer and Teacher Feedback in Korean High School English Classes
Cho, Y., & Sohn, T. (2007) · English Teaching · doi:10.15858/engtea.62.3.200709.307 · Cited by 4
“These results appear to show that teacher feedback would lead to more revision, similarly to the findings of Connor and Asenavage (1994), Paulus (1999), and Tsui and Ng (2000).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialBe Creative and Collaborative: Strategies and Implications of Blogging in EFL Classes
Roy, C. K. (2016) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v9n7p129 · Cited by 4
“And in relation to peer versus teacher feedback, Tsui and Ng (2000) concluded that, although students value teacher feedback as being more academically important than peer responses, student feedback is nonetheless crucial to the development of students’ writing skills because peers provide student…”
BackgroundHosseini, M., & Mowlaie, B. (2016) · Journal of Universal Language · Cited by 4
Shared time, shared problems? Exploring the dynamics of paired writing conferences
Yeh, C.-C. (2017) · Pedagogies An International Journal · doi:10.1080/1554480x.2017.1356232 · Cited by 4
“…execution of the requirement varied in degree and kind, the analysis suggested that peer review prompted learners to compare their writing so that they became aware of their own strengths and weaknesses, a feature identified as one of the benefits offered by peer feedback (Tsui & Ng, 2000).”
BackgroundPEER REVIEW IN EFL WRITING CLASSROOMS AT RUSSIAN UNIVERSITIES: CULTURAL FACTORS
Аркадьевна, Д. С., & Kopylova, N. V. (2019) · Вестник Самарского университета. История, педагогика, филология · doi:10.18287/2542-0445-2019-25-3-139-147 · Cited by 4
A Study of Facebook-Based Peer Comments on L2 Writing
Ho, P. V. P., & Hoai, A. N. T. (2021) · Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research/Advances in social science, education and humanities research · doi:10.2991/assehr.k.210226.014 · Cited by 5
Students’ Perceptions Towards Technology-supported Collaborative Peer Feedback
Sağlamel, H., & Çetinkaya, Ş. E. (2022) · IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics) · doi:10.21093/ijeltal.v6i2.978 · Cited by 4
“…them identify their writing strengths and weaknesses, decrease their writing anxiety, take the responsibility of their writing decisions and learning, i.e., autonomy, and develop a sense of audience (see, for instance, Min, 2006; Sivaci, 2020; Tsui & Ng, 2000; Yu & Lee, 2016), to list but a few.”
BackgroundProcess writing in a product-oriented context: challenges and possibilities
Boas, I. V. (2014) · Revista Brasileira de Lingüística Aplicada · doi:10.1590/s1984-63982014005000011 · Cited by 4
Confessions of a Technophobe and a Technophile: The Changing Perspective of Technology in ESL
Hayward, N., & Tuzi, F. (2003) · TESOL Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1949-3533.2003.tb00113.x · Cited by 4
Analyzing the Effects of Peer Review Activities in the EFL Writings
YOSHIZAWA, S., Terano, T., & Yoshikawa, A. (2010) · International Conference on Computers in Education · doi:10.58459/icce.2010.268 · Cited by 4
An Exploration of the Reliability and Validity of Peer Assessment of Writing in Secondary Education
Meletiadou, E., & Tsagari, D. (2014) · doi:10.2478/9788376560915.p14 · Cited by 3
Patterns of Interaction on Peer Feedback: Pair Dynamics in Developing Students’ Writing Skills
Kuyyogsuy, S. (2019) · International Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.5430/ijhe.v8n3p191 · Cited by 4
Effects of Blended Peer Feedback Modes on Learners’ Writing Performance and Perspectives
Cha, Y. J. (2014) · Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.15702/mall.2014.17.2.11 · Cited by 4
Lira-Gonzales, M.-L., Nassaji, H., & Chao, K.-W. C. (2021) · Formation et profession · doi:10.18162/fp.2021.602 · Cited by 4
“Nos résultats rejoignent également ceux constatés par Kangni (2015) et Tsui et Ng (2000) dans leur recherche concernant la croyance des étudiants qui considèrent que l’enseignant est la seule autorité capable de leur proposer une rétroaction adéquate et que leurs habiletés linguistiques et celles…”
BackgroundScaffolding Instruction of Chinese Essay Writing with Assessment as Learning
Cheng, G., Tan, C. L., & Chin, C. K. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-8860-5_9 · Cited by 5
A study of lexical errors in Cantonese ESL students' writing
Jim, M.-H. (2005) · doi:10.5353/th_b3160281 · Cited by 4
PEER AND SELF REVIEW: A HOLISTIC EXAMINATION OF EFL LEARNERS' WRITING AND REVIEW PROCESS
Johnson, K. G. (2012) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) · Cited by 4
Computer-mediated and face-to-face peer feedback in second language writing
Pham, H. T. P. (2019) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17139836.v1 · Cited by 2
Zhan, Y., & Teng, M. F. (2025) · Language Testing in Asia · doi:10.1186/s40468-025-00400-w · Cited by 3
“Peer feedback in the context of writing further underscores the potential of self-regulation in writing, in line with Tsui and Ng (2000).”
Aimah, F. R., & Suhartoyo, E. (2024) · Journal on English as a Foreign Language · doi:10.23971/jefl.v14i1.7247 · Cited by 3
“Teacher corrections and comments are more favored by students (Tsui & Ng, 2000).”
BackgroundResultRavand, H., Effatpanah, F., Kunina‐Habenicht, O., & Madison, M. J. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1521808 · Cited by 3
Promoting draft revision motivation and quality through technology-enhanced peer feedback workshops
Zheng, Q. (2025) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-025-10450-9 · Cited by 5
“…online peer feedback was shown to yield more substantial writing improvement (Cho & Schunn, 2007; Hartberg et al., 2008), challenging the conventional belief that teacher feedback was more useful than peer feedback in facilitating improvement in revision (Tsui & Ng, 2000; Yang et al., 2006).”
InfluentialUnpacking Student Responses to Discrepant Peer and Teacher Feedback: A Cross-National Comparison
Lopera-Oquendo, C., Lipnevich, A. A., Tomazin, L., Máñez, I., León, S. P., & Beatson, N. J. (2025) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102394 · Cited by 3
Exploring Peer Revision as a Strategy in the ESL Writing Classroom
Attan, A., & Khalidi, H. (2015) · SHS Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/shsconf/20151805002 · Cited by 3
Dialogue and monologue: A practice of producing a coherent document
Yosh, S., & Kambayashi, Y. (2009) · IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm) · doi:10.1109/ipcc.2009.5208673 · Cited by 3
“Tsui & Ng found that teacher comments tended to induce more revisions to the macro-structures of a text, whereas peer comments made the students conscious of the real audience and raised the students’ awareness of strengths and weaknesses of their own writings [9].”
BackgroundError Feedback on Students’ Writings by Chinese Tertiary Teachers of English
Wang, J., & Wu, J. (2012) · Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1515/cjal-2012-0022 · Cited by 3
“Another possible reason might be that the students in the study have limited experience with student-centered education and thus rely much on the expertise of the teacher (Tsui & Ng, 2000).”
BackgroundAsynchronous Online Peer Written Corrective Feedback
Vaezi, S., & Abbaspour, E. (2015) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-8519-2.ch012 · Cited by 4
The Effects of Giving Peer Feedback: Case Studies of Korean Learners of English
Cho, S. (2011) · English Language and Linguistics · doi:10.17960/ell.2011.17.2.004 · Cited by 3
Measuring Peer Feedback on Writing Class: A Study on Third-Semester Pre-Service English Teachers
Sumekto, D. R., & Setyawati, H. (2019) · Lingua Cultura · doi:10.21512/lc.v13i1.5058 · Cited by 6
“Thus, peer feedback does not always lead students to rightly revise their writing because of the useful and effective feedback is not generally revealed (Tsui & Ng, 2000; Jiang & Yu, 2014).”
BackgroundAncha, F. D. L. E. D. L. U. D. P., & Núñez, Y. H. (2021) · Revista Lusófona de Educação · doi:10.24140/issn.1645-7250.rle49.01 · Cited by 3
The Impact of Online and Face-to-Face Peer Feedback on Pre-Service Teachers in EFL Academic Writing
Kaçar, I. G. (2021) · Design Solutions for Adaptive Hypermedia Listening Software · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-7876-6.ch007 · Cited by 1
Effectiveness of Peer Feedback in Teaching Academic Chinese Writing for CSL Students
(2024) · International Journal of Chinese Language Teaching · doi:10.46451/ijclt.20250113 · Cited by 3
“…feedback on L2 writing and found that it could enhance students’ independent learning and problem-solving abilities (de Guerrero & Villamil, 1994; Tsui & Ng, 2000), improve students’ learning autonomy (Miao et al., 2006), raise students’ reader awareness (Hung, 2016), reduce students’ writing…”
Peer Correction On Writing Quality Of College Students Having Different Cognitive Styles
Wahyuni, S. (2019) · INFERENSI Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan · doi:10.18326/infsl3.v12i2.259-282 · Cited by 3
“Furthermore, Tsui and NG (2000) conducted a study on a secondary school found that peer correction contributes positively to the students’ writing.”
BackgroundHomayounzadeh, M., Mehrpour, S., & Saadat, M. (2016) · Journal of Language Teaching and Learning · doi:10.66887/jltl.v6i2.28 · Cited by 3
Reese, A. N., Rachamalla, R. R., Rudniy, A., Aull, L. L., & Eubanks, D. (2018) · The Journal of Writing Analytics · doi:10.37514/jwa-j.2018.2.1.05 · Cited by 3
Nielsen, K. (2014) · The WAC Clearinghouse; Parlor Press eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2014.0551.2.05 · Cited by 3
Integrating Computer-Mediated Peer Review in ESL/EFL Higher Education: A Systematic Review
Drajatı, N. A., Rochsantiningsih, D., Cahyaningrum, D., Handayani, E. I. P., & Kurtianti, E. (2022) · AL-ISHLAH Jurnal Pendidikan · doi:10.35445/alishlah.v15i1.2872 · Cited by 3
Do, T. B. T. (2020) · Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching · doi:10.56040/tbtd1727 · Cited by 3
Lakarnchua, O., & Wasanasomsithi, P. (2013) · Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.17718/tojde.19097 · Cited by 3
Pictogram network: Evaluating english composition skills
Yoshizawa-Watanabe, S., Kunigami, M., Takahashi, S., et al. (2012) · IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm) · doi:10.1109/ipcc.2012.6408644 · Cited by 3
“Since then, it has been verified that the peer review method helps students to develop logical thinking skills and provide insight into their own writings [2-7].”
BackgroundSerrano, M. V., & Tamayo, A. M. C. (2015) · CES Psicología · doi:10.21615/cesp.3170 · Cited by 3
Lap, T. Q. (2013) · i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching · doi:10.26634/jelt.3.4.2517 · Cited by 3
“As regards the effects of peer feedback on the quality of learners' writing, most previous studies have indicated that peer feedback results in improvements in learners' writing (Hedgcock and Lefkowitz, 1992; Todd and Hudson, 2007; Tsui and Ng, 2000).”
ResultA Reflective Overview of a Process Approach to Writing in Generation 1.5 ESL Classrooms
Dikli, S., Jernigan, J., & Bleyle, S. (2015) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-6619-1.ch005 · Cited by 3
Skill Level Based Cooperative Peer Feedback in EFL Writing Students
Ryoo, M.-L., & Wing, M. L. (2012) · Cited by 3
Paired Peer Review in a Distance-taught EFL Writing Course
Xiao, J., & Radio, S. (2008) · Cited by 3
The Effect of Online Feedback Types on Foreign Language Writing
Liu, X., & ChangPing, Z. (2018) · Theory and Practice in Language Studies · doi:10.17507/tpls.0807.03 · Cited by 3
“Tsui & Ng (2000, p.148) stresses the importance of feedback as a “central and critical contribution to the evolution of a piece of writing.”
BackgroundTEACHERS’ CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK ON STUDENTS’ L2 WRITING: STATE OF THE ART
Susanti, A. (2017) · Abjadia International Journal of Education · doi:10.18860/abj.v2i2.5364 · Cited by 4
Haugaard, R. H. (2018) · Fachsprache · doi:10.24989/fs.v50i3-4.1517 · Cited by 3
Nusrat, A., Ashraf, F., & Saeed, R. (2019) · International Journal of English Linguistics · doi:10.5539/ijel.v9n4p314 · Cited by 3
“Previous research studies (Connor & Asenavage, 1994; Hedgcock & Lefkowitz, 1992; Miao, Richard, & Yu, 2006; Tsui & Ng, 2000; Wu, 2006; Zhao, 2010) compared instructors’ and peers’ oral feedback and look for the improvement on subsequent drafts of the same writing, while the longitudinal effect of…”
BackgroundMethodSuryani, R. W., Rozimela, Y., & Anwar, D. (2019) · International Journal of Secondary Education · doi:10.11648/j.ijsedu.20190704.14 · Cited by 3
“Other researchers consider peer feedback as complementary to teacher feedback [11].”
BackgroundInfluentialEffects of Paper-based and Online Asynchronous Corrective Feedback on EFL Writing
Huang, H.-W., Xu, Y., Bai, Y., & Dusza, D. (2020) · International Conference on Education Technology and Computer · doi:10.1145/3436756.3437027 · Cited by 3
“Through peer feedback, students understand that their writing work will be viewed by a real audience [6] and they have more motivation to write correctly [12].”
BackgroundImplementing Peer Assessment for Optimal Effects : Learners’ Voice
Joh, J. (2021) · The Journal of AsiaTEFL · doi:10.18823/asiatefl.2021.18.1.1.1 · Cited by 3
Secondary Students’ Perceptions of Their Engagement in a Correcting Process
Dang, T. T. D. (2021) · International Education Studies · doi:10.5539/ies.v14n12p78 · Cited by 3
“These responses clarify students’ perceived benefits of teacher and peer feedback, on peer collaboration, task interest, and accuracy improvement (Lee, 2015; Tsui & Ng, 2000).”
BackgroundChew, S. W., Fang, W., Hsu, C.-N., & Chen, N. (2018) · Lecture notes in educational technology · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-8743-1_6 · Cited by 3
Chapter 3. "Hey, Did You Get That?": L2 Student Reading Across the Curriculum
Niestepski, M. (2014) · The WAC Clearinghouse; Parlor Press eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2014.0551.2.03 · Cited by 3
Kuyyogsuy, S. (2022) · World Journal of English Language · doi:10.5430/wjel.v12n5p217 · Cited by 3
Teaching L2 Writing in Large Classes : The Effects of Peer Feedback in Different Task Sequences
Kim, N. (2022) · The Journal of AsiaTEFL · doi:10.18823/asiatefl.2022.19.3.1.740 · Cited by 4
Coté, R. A. (2013) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) · Cited by 3
The Effectiveness of Peer Feedback on Second Language Writing
Chen, Y. (2024) · Journal of Contemporary Educational Research · doi:10.26689/jcer.v8i2.6146 · Cited by 2
Enabling Peer Feedback in Teacher Education: The Use of Virtual Reality-Based Microteaching
Jacobsen, L. J., Weber, K. E., Prilop, C. N., Huang, Y., Geske, A., & Richter, E. (2025) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331251390698 · Cited by 6
“Furthermore, it is possible that pre-service teachers ’ generally positive attitudes towards receiving any feedback, regardless of modality, are a function of limited prior feedback experiences or social desirability in structured settings (Altstaedter & Doolittle, 2014; Tsui & Ng, 2000).”
Improving writing through evidence-based teaching
Busse, V., Cao, Y., Kischnick, J. M., Sieveke, P., & Graham, S. (2026) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2026.102361 · Cited by 5
Comparison of Peer Feedback by Undergraduate Korean Students and Native English Freshmen
김훈밀 (2013) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.17936/pkelt.2013.25.3.004 · Cited by 2
Effects of Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) Peer Review in an EFL Writing Course
Lin, Y. (2020) · International Journal of English Linguistics · doi:10.5539/ijel.v10n6p417 · Cited by 2
“…for them to discover the mismatch between writer’s intended meaning and reader’s understood meaning (Berg, 1999; Villaim & Guerrero, 1998; Tsui & Ng, 2000; Rollinson, 2005); it helps to raise students’ awareness of their strengths and weakness and to cultivate their self-regulatory…”
BackgroundComplementary Teaching Strategies Anchored in the Peer-Assisted Learning Model
Rosencrum, E., Hildebrand, E. E., Negron, M., & Adkinson, C. (2021) · Athletic Training Education Journal · doi:10.4085/1947-380x-20-87 · Cited by 2
“We improved presenting voice in our writing”
Wang, Y., Chen, H., & Brown, T. P. (2022) · Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1075/resla.20023.wan · Cited by 2
Changes in Argumentation Performance: Effects of Teacher-Student Collaborative Assessment
Xu, X., Zhong, Y., & Shao, Z. (2022) · Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1515/cjal-2022-0401 · Cited by 3
The Effects of Integrated Feedback based on AWE on English Writting of Chinese EFL Learners
Liu, M., & Shao, C. (2024) · Scalable Computing Practice and Experience · doi:10.12694/scpe.v25i2.2617 · Cited by 3
“In addition, it may also be that learners lack of confidence in peers, believing that they cannot be a qualified reviewer, and therefore be skeptical of PF (Cai 2011; Muncie 2000; Tsui and Ng 2000), and thus slower to improve writing skills (Gong 2007; Wang 2004).”
BackgroundUse of Peer-Assessment in ESL Writing Classes: Learners’ Perception
Pushpakumara, P. B. S. L. (2024) · Vidyodaya Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences · doi:10.31357/fhss/vjhss.v09irchss2023.a01 · Cited by 2
Peer editing and writing proficiency: an experimental study in South Korean higher education
Campbell, C. W., & Brandon, M. W. (2024) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2024.2399701 · Cited by 2
“…have findings that align with this study and have shown that university EFL/ESL students are able to give accurate peer feedback in an editing/revision context (Berg 1999; Hyland 2000; Lund-strom and Baker 2009; Min 2005; Tsui and Ng 2000) The researchers identified two primary areas of interest.”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsui, A. B. M., & Ng, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Second Language Writing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 147-170
- ISSN
- 1060-3743 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2028315260
- Semantic Scholar
- 02e037b65932a8c3755701134d5bd22e5a379728
- Cited by
- 648
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 24.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Second Language Writing (publishedVersion)
- The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- peer feedback, teacher comments, second language writing, writing revision, high school students, cooperative learning, Hong Kong
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
