Cited by 648EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningStudent Assessment and FeedbackSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Do Secondary L2 Writers Benefit from Peer Comments?

Tsui, Amy B.M, Ng, Maria·2000·Journal of Second Language Writing

DOI 10.1016/s1060-3743(00)00022-9

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1060-3743(00)00022-9

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Learner Strategies in Language Learning
Ehrman, M. E., Wenden, A. L., & Rubin, J. (1990) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/328531 · Cited by 1,533
Research on Written Composition: New Directions for Teaching
Witte, S. P., Larson, R. L., & Hillocks, G. (1987) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/357721 · Cited by 694
Second Language Writing. Research Insights for the Classroom.
Kroll, B. (1990) · Modern Language Journal · Cited by 656
Student Reactions to Teacher Response in Multiple‐Draft Composition Classrooms*
Ferris, D. (1995) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587804 · Cited by 630
The influence of teacher commentary on student revision
Ferris, D. R. (1997) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588049 · Cited by 618 · cited 1×
“…university ESL students' first drafts and revised drafts and found that text-specific teacher comments in the form of marginal notes, teacher comments that requested information and clarification, and teacher comments on grammar appeared to induce the most substantive revision (see Ferris, 1997).”
Background
Salience of Feedback on Error and Its Effect on EFL Writing Quality
Robb, T., Ross, S. J., & Shortreed, I. (1986) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586390 · Cited by 568
Teacher response to student writing: focus on form versus content
Fathman, A. K., & Whalley, E. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524551.016 · Cited by 460
Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction
Mendonça, C. O., Johnson, K. E., & Mendonca, C. O. (1994) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587558 · Cited by 446
Second language composition instruction: developments, issues, and directions in ESL
Silva, T. J. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524551.005 · Cited by 414
Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class
Zhang, S. (1995) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/1060-3743(95)90010-1 · Cited by 405

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

Mittan, 1989, The peer review process: harnessing students' communicative power, 207
Partridge, K.L. (1981). A comparison of the effectiveness of peer vs. teacher evaluation for helping students of English as a second language to improve the quality of their written compositions. MA Thesis, Department of ESL, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
Pfeiffer, K. (1981). The effects of peer evaluation and personality on writing anxiety and writing performance in college freshmen. Ed. D. Dissertation, Texas Tech University.
Pierson, H. (1967). Peer and teacher correction: a comparison of the effects of two methods of teaching composition in grade nine English classes. PhD Dissertation, New York University.

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 643

Writing, peer feedback, and revision : a comparison of l1 and l2 college freshmen with longitudinal analyses
Kim, H. (2012) · Texas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library)
Critical Writing : Exploring the Needs of Students in a Writing Classroom
Lehtinen, B. (2008) · Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)
Journeys to the centre : case studies of German-L1 novice scholars writing for publication in English
Armstrong, T. (2012) · IOE EPrints
AKRAN DÖNÜT EĞĠTĠMĠ PROGRAMININ YAZMA BECERĠLERĠNĠN GELĠġĠMĠ ÜZERĠNDEKĠ ETKĠSĠ
Çiftci, A., & Çöker, B. (2011) · DSpace Repository
Application of peer editing method in English composition class: A positive outcome
Ferdouse, F. (2013) · Stamford Journal of English · doi:10.3329/sje.v6i0.13907
“The beneficial impact and effectiveness of peer editing have been substantiated by a number of empirical studies; for example, Min (2006), Tsui & Maria (2000).”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Receiving feedback from more advanced learners of English through the internet.
Okamura, A. (2004)
La revisión: uso de los comentarios para mejorar textos escritos en inglés.
Villalobos, J. (2006) · Actualidad Contable FACES
Students' Perceptions Towards Peer Feedback Approach in a Malaysian English as a Second Language (ESL) Classroom
Husin, M. S., & Ariffin, K. (2008)
Adoption of the process- oriented writing approach in a Japanese high school
Kurihara, N. (2014)
A Near Peer Review Task for Language Learners
Umehara, H. (2012)
Chapter XX Assessing the Quality of Online Peer Feedback in L2 Writing
Rosalia, C., & Llosa, L. (2009)
Peer review and revisions in electronic vs. traditional modes on L2 writing
McKay, S. (2007)
INVESTIGATING THE REVISION PROCESS IN A WEB-BASED PEER REVIEW SYSTEM USING MACHINE LEARNING
Leijen, D. A. J. (2015) · EDULEARN proceedings
Revision behaviors in a peer-reviewed multi-draft writing context
Ryu, H. (2013) · Journal of the Korea English Education Society · doi:10.18649/jkees.2013.12.2.195
Implementation and Perception of Online Peer Feedback by Korean EFL Students
박효정, & Choe, H. (2011) · English21 · doi:10.35771/engdoi.2011.24.3.013
Peer versus Self Corrections and the Pursuit of Grammatical Accuracy in FL Writing: Student Perceptions and Realities
Schonagen, M. E. (2008)
An investigation of co-operative error correction in Asian education settings.
Cousins, B. J. (2017) · Figshare · doi:10.4225/03/58b790c43c63e
College Students' Revision Behaviors: Are they Motivated by the Inner-drive or Teacher Feedback?
Ryu, H. (2015) · The Journal of Foreign Studies · doi:10.15755/jfs.2015..31.7
Self-Assessment in a Korean Online University EFL Writing Classroom
박수정 (2014) · The Journal of Foreign Studies · doi:10.15755/jfs.2014..29.70
Feedback on Peer Feedback in EFL Composing: Four Stories
Huh, M.-H., & 이장호 (2011) · The Journal of English Language and Literature · doi:10.15794/jell.2011.57.6.004
Effects of Peer Comments of Elementary Students on Revision
안상희, & 심유나 (2014) · KOREAN EDUCATION · doi:10.15734/koed..99.201406.123
Briefly Review of E-Feedback
Zhang, M. (2015) · International Conference on Economics, Management, Law and Education (EMLE) · doi:10.2991/emle-15.2015.104
“…of the text (Tsui & Ng, 2000) [6], generate more positive attitudes toward writing (Min, 2005)[7], enhance audience awareness (Mittan, 1989[8]; Tsui & Ng, 2000[6]), and facilitate their second language acquisition (Byrd, 1994[9]; Lockhart & Ng, 1995[10]) and oral fluency development…”
BackgroundInfluential
An exploration of ESL learners' emergent beliefs about academic group work and peer review at a New Zealand university
Hislop, J. L. (2016) · Otago University Research Archive (University of Otago)
ffective ways of Teaching English Writing to prepare for the Secondary School English Teachers’ Employment Examination
전영주 (2009) · Studies in English Language & Literature · doi:10.21559/aellk.2009.35.4.009
The Role of Writing in RTI at the Secondary Level
Herring, D. S. (2015) · Advances in early childhood and K-12 education · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-8516-1.ch005
Aspects of Peer Responses and Their Reactions in College Writing Composition
Seo, S. (2011) · korean language education research · doi:10.20880/kler.2011..41.447
Impact of Collaborative and Reflective Writing Activities on Students’ Autonomy in Writing: An Action Research on Freshmen Law Students
Tanyeli, N. (2016) · Eastern Mediterranean University Institutional Repository (Eastern Mediterranean University)
Effective Writing and Responding Online
Tuzi, F., & Lynn, M. (2008)
Practical and Theoretical Considerations Practical and Theoretical Considerations in the Design of a System for Managing in the Design of a System for Managing Peer Feedback on Oral Production Peer Feedback on Oral Production
Rose, R. L. (2014)
Feedback in College English Writing Based on Computer Automated Scoring System
Xiang, Y. (2016) · International Seminar on Education Innovation and Economic Management (SEIEM) · doi:10.2991/seiem-16.2016.20
A case study of the effects of written feedback on acquiring Korean particles ‘i/ka’, ‘un/nun’
The Korean Society of Bilingualism, Jun, Y., & Hwang, J. (2016) · doi:10.17296/korbil.2016..64.217
Negotiating Power In L2 Synchronous Online Peer Response Groups
Tsai, M. (2017) · L2 Journal · doi:10.5070/l29131689
“…response appears to facilitate language practices (Lockhart & Ng, 1995; Mendonça & Johnson, 1994), encourage collaborative reading and writing (Tsui & Ng, 2000), enhance intercultural communication (Hansen & Liu, 2005), and promote interactional and writing abilities (Liang, 2010; Min, 2006, 2008).”
Background
The Effect of Corrective Feedback on the Writing Accuracy of Feedback Givers and Receivers
Azizian, E., & Rouhi, A. (2015) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
Exploring EFL Learners’ Strategies of How They Improve the Process of Their Writing Assignments
Yamamoto, Y., & Nagao, A. (2016) · The Asian Conference on Language Learning 2016 - Official Conference Proceedings
Perspectives on Feedback in L2 Writing
Lee, I. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-3924-9_5
A Comparative Study on the Three Versions of Mainstream English Textbooks of New Curriculum for the Senior High School in China
Xu, K. (2016) · Higher education of social science · doi:10.3968/n
Teachers practices and beliefs regarding peer assessment in L2 writing classrooms at Jimma town, South-Western Ethiopia
Haimanot, A., Seyoum, G., & Mossissa, T. E. (2017) · Journal of Languages and Culture · doi:10.5897/jlc2016.0385
Systematic Analyses of Peer and Teacher Feedback: Korean University Students vs. Native English Instructor
김훈밀 (2013) · Journal of the Korea English Education Society · doi:10.18649/jkees.2013.12.3.261
Enhance Teachers’ Composition Teaching Literacy and Autonomy through Online Interactive Writing Course – “Learning by Doing”: An Effective Way of Teacher Training
Cheng, G., Chin, C. K., & Tay, B. P. (2015)
Testning af skriftlig sprogfærdighed i franskuddannelsen på KU – en reliabel og valid sprogprøve?
Lindschouw, J. (2015) · Ny forskning i grammatik · doi:10.7146/nfg.v23i22.23492
Understanding Learner Talk About Writing: The Second Language Peer Response (L2PR) Corpus
Friginal, E., Lee, J. J., Polat, B., & Roberson, A. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59900-7_11
Writing development of second language learners of Japanese at an Australian university
Kikuchi, Y. (2017) · Minerva Access (University of Melbourne)
The Effects of Multi-Source Feedback on EFL Students’ Reflection of English Speaking Skills
Yin, J. (2017) · Journal of the Korea English Education Society · doi:10.18649/jkees.2017.16.3.155
O feedback corretivo oral em pares para a produção textual escrita no Teletandem Institucional-Integrado
Bragagnollo, R. M. (2017) · Raído · doi:10.30612/raido.v11i27.5694
Korean EFL Learnersʼ Mitigating Strategies in Written Peer Feedback on Writing
류혜경 (2017) · Journal of Education & Culture · doi:10.24159/joec.2017.23.4.481
A Study on the Role of Peer Feedback in High School Learners’ Writing
김경숙, & 서영미 (2016) · The Journal of Studies in Language · doi:10.18627/jslg.32.3.201611.357
Measuring Syntactic Maturity in the Written Performance of Tunisian Deaf Students
Ayadi, M. (2018) · TAYR Quarterly · doi:10.31561/2017tq2018tqv52018tqi3ayadi
Which is which? The Face or the Book: Tunisian EFL learners’ Use of Facebook in L2 Paragraph Writing
Sassi, W. (2018) · TAYR Quarterly · doi:10.31561/2014tq2018tqv52018tqi3sassi
The Rhetorics of Violence in Jalila Baccar and Fadhel Jaïbi’s Violence(s)
Zahrouni, R. (2018) · TAYR Quarterly · doi:10.31561/2014tq2018tqv52018tqi3
Improving the Literacy Skills of Struggling Writers
Herring, D. S. (2019) · Advances in early childhood and K-12 education · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-8322-6.ch006
The Effect of Peer Feedback on English Student-Teacher Training in Chinese Higher Education
廖, 琳. (2019) · Overseas English Testing Pedagogy and Research · doi:10.12677/oetpr.2019.11006
An Investigation of Alternative Assessment for writing skill in second semester of Industrial Engineering at University of Muhammadiyah Gresik
Rizqiyah, D. M., & Asmara, C. H. (2018) · Journal of English Teaching Literature and Applied Linguistics · doi:10.30587/jetlal.v1i2.317
Process Approach Used by Students in Essay Writing at English Departmant
Rahmalia, I. (2019) · Linguistic English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal · doi:10.31539/leea.v2i2.638
Students’ Development as Writers and Reviewers through Trained Peer Review in a Writing Course
문도식 (2010) · English21 · doi:10.35771/engdoi.2010.23.3.014
Effects of Collaborative Writing Activities on University Students’ Business Writing Performance and Learning Strategies
Kim, B.-G. (2018) · English21 · doi:10.35771/engdoi.2018.31.3.012
Exploring Peer Feedback in the EFL Pair Debate Assessment
ShinHeeWon, & LeeHo (2018) · English21 · doi:10.35771/engdoi.2018.31.4.011
Professional Learning Community in Pre-Service Teacher Education: Learning to become teacher researchers
Yusuf, F. N., Rodliyah, R. S., Gunawan, M. H., & Danuwijaya, A. A. (2019) · Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN) · doi:10.2991/conaplin-18.2019.234
“Some considered teacher feedback as significantly more effective than peer comments [17].”
Background
Exploring a teacher's facilitation of a collaborative story writing unit using Google Docs in a culturally and linguistically diverse high school English class
Wilson, D. (2019) · UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)
Comparison of Variables Influencing on Students’ Satisfaction about the Process of English Writing Conducted by English Native and Korean Instructors
Jung, Y.-S. (2018) · The Journal of Studies in Language · doi:10.18627/jslg.34.3.201811.393
“특히, 영어쓰기가 이루어지는 절차, 수업 환경, 학습자의 다양한 배경과 흥미도, 그리고 평가 방법 및 평가 기준 등에 대한 학습자들의 정확한 이해는 평가 결과에 중대한 영향을 미친다(정양수, 2017; Tsui and Ng, 2000).”
Student agency in collaborative writing: A sociocognitive perspective
Pu, Y.-E. A. (2020) · Research Commons (University of Waikato)
Peer edition as a means for fostering EFL short story writing in a local private school an action research
Torres, M., & Alberto, D. (2020) · reponame:Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pedagógica Nacional
Review Strategies in a First-Year University Undergraduate Thai EFL Writing Context
Puengpipattrakul, W. (2020) · PASAA · doi:10.58837/chula.pasaa.60.1.9
The effects of explicit metacognitive strategy training on efl students' revision of their argumentative essay
Chaya, W. (2005)
Exploring Learners’ Characteristics and Educational Practices and Proposing Four Learning Strategies: Case Study:
Nanda, D. W. (2020) · doi:10.46643/ijtvet.v1i1.17
“Moreover, a study conducted by [25], it showed that peer-feedback could improve students’ understanding about their strengths and weaknesses because peer learners who have just studied something are often better to review it to the student [23].”
Background
EFL Students’ Response on the Impact of Online Peer Feedback on Their Writing Performance
Nurviyani, R., & Purnawarman, P. (2020) · International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (ICOLLITE) · doi:10.2991/assehr.k.201215.095
“…several studies have identified the weakness and strength of peer feedback (Bitchener & Ferris, 2012; Carson & Nelson, 1996; Nelson & Carson, 1998; Tsui & Ng, 2000) whose the results reported that peer feedback conquered with students’ center learning, it not only upgrades their writing ability…”
Background
Anonymizing the Peer Response Process: An Effective Way to Increase Proposed Revisions?
Garner, J. F., & Hadingham, O. (2019) · ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University)
Written Feedback in Health Sciences Education: “What You Write May Be Perceived as Banal”
Jolly, B. C. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-6106-7_52-1
Scaffolding Information of Learner’s Dictionaries for L2 Writing: A User Perspective
Na, Y., Yan, L., & Jie, Z. (2021) · Sino-US English Teaching · doi:10.17265/1539-8072/2021.03.001
Peer Feedback Comments and Revision Strategies of L2 Writers: Insights from the Analyses of Their Reflection Texts
畠山, 由., & Hatakeyama, Y. (2021)
إستخدام التعلم المعکوس لتنمیة مهارتى القراءة والکتابة الناقدة لطلاب کلیه التربیة تخصص اللغه الإنجلیزیه
حسن, م. ع. م. (2021) · مجلة البحث في التربية وعلم النفس · doi:10.21608/mathj.2021.77572.1103
Remote Peer Review: Readiness, Efficacy, and Challenges
Kita, S. (2021) · doi:10.37546/jaltpcp2020-45
Do peer reflection and self-reflection increase motivation for one’s self-improvement: An empirical analysis in an online learning environment
Kuhlmann, T. (2020)
A Study on the Effects of Japanese University Students' Peer Review Activities on Their Learner Communities, Autonomy, and EFL Writing Learning
佐竹, 幸. (2017) · Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · doi:10.15083/00077318
The Impact of Japanese University Students’ EFL Writing Class Community on their Peer Review Activities and Learning of EFL Writing
Satake, Y. (2021) · doi:10.34399/jaseus.38.0_19
Feedback provision in L2 writing classes: the use of poster presentations to fill a gap
Coomber, M. (2011) · Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · doi:10.34382/00002645
Computer-Mediated Peer Response
Li, M. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87710-1_4
Enhanced Language Use Through from Peer and Teacher Feedback, Self-directed Learning and Interaction in the Target Language
Chaudhuri, T., López-Ozieblo, R., & Martínez, V. (2022) · Springer briefs in education · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-8098-4_4
Revisión de pares en un curso de escritura creativa en inglés: foco y posicionamiento de los revisores
Rodríguez, S. C., & Espinosa, A. R. (2021) · Revista Boletín Redipe · doi:10.36260/rbr.v10i12.1585
“De manera similar, Tsui y Ng (2000) encontraron que los estudiantes de secundaria de Hong Kong veían al maestro como una “figura de autoridad que garantizaba la calidad” (p. 149) y se mostraban reacios a confiar en las correcciones de sus compañeros.”
Background
Chapter 16. Campus Internationalization: A Center-based Model for ESLready Programs
Mallett, K., & Zgheib, C. (2014) · The WAC Clearinghouse; Parlor Press eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2014.0551.2.16
Comments and Discussion
Rose, R. L., & Feedback, P. (1994) · Law & Society Review · doi:10.2307/3054082
Chapter 15. Teaching Writing in a Globally Networked Learning Environment (GNLE): Diverse Students at a Distance
Craig, J. L. (2014) · The WAC Clearinghouse; Parlor Press eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2014.0551.2.15
Chapter 9. Let's See Where Your Chinese Students Come From: A Qualitative Descriptive Study of Writing in the Disciplines in China
Dan, W. (2014) · The WAC Clearinghouse; Parlor Press eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2014.0551.2.09
The Effectiveness of Using Correction Techniques on The Achievement of Iraqi Collage learners in Punctuation Marks Accuracy
(2019) · Journal of Arts, Literature, Humanities and Social Sciences · doi:10.33193/jalhss.40.25
A comparison of lexical feedback on writing received from peers and a teacher
Ruegg, R. (2013) · Vocabulary Learning and Instruction · doi:10.7820/vli.v02.1.ruegg
Chapter 18. Writing Histories: Lingua Franca English in a Swedish Graduate Program
Lavelle, T., & Shima, A. (2014) · The WAC Clearinghouse; Parlor Press eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2014.0551.2.18
Factors Impacting Upon Writing Teachers’ Feedback Choices
Yang, J. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-92762-2_12
An Investigation into Peer Feedback in English Writing Assignment
Pham, A. T. V. (2022) · doi:10.1145/3543407.3543429
“Tsui and Ng [10] found that peer comments help students establish a true feeling of audience, ownership of the essay, and knowledge of their own writing flaws.”
Background
Students Reflection Toward the Application of Peer Assessment Activity by Using Moodle-Based Workshop to Empower Learning Autonomy
Rosyid, A., & Vonti, L. H. (2022) · Pedagonal Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan · doi:10.55215/pedagonal.v6i2.4738
Metapragmatic Expressions as Relation-oriented Strategies in Peer Feedback: A Case Study of Business English Writing
Chen, J. (2022) · International Journal of English Language Studies · doi:10.32996/ijels.2022.4.4.4
“They are also more willing to reflect on their limitations by comparing their manuscripts with others (Tsui & Ng, 2000) to polish their own work further (Richards, 1990; Bailey, 2016).”
Background
A Research on the Application of Peer Assessment in Second Language Writing from the Perspective of Cooperative Learning
(2022) · Journal of Educational Research and Policies · doi:10.53469/jerp.2022.04(12).10
Effects of peer-review on Peerceptiv in English writing
Zhang, Z. L., & Luo, D. (2022) · International Conference on Computer Science and Communication Technology (ICCSCT) · doi:10.1117/12.2662339
Blogging to Build Collaborative Evaluation in L2 Writing
Bilki, Z., & İrgin, P. (2022) · English language education · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-13540-8_15
Investigating the Efficiency of Peer Feedback and Mobile-assisted Feedback for Chinese Pronunciation Correction in the Context of Learning Chinese as Second Language
Chen, Z., & Wei, W. (2021) · Journal of Macau University of Science and Technology · doi:10.58664/mustjournal.2021.02.075
Activating Students’ Participation in Chinese EFL Writing Classes: An Integrated Approach
Wang, Z., & Du, X. (2022) · International Conference on Education Technology and Computers (ICETC) · doi:10.1145/3572549.3572640
“The often-cited advantages of peer feedback are that it assists learners in developing analytical techniques and critical thinking, gaining a sense of audience as well as raising students’ awareness of self-learning and of their own strengths and weaknesses [13].”
Background
La retroalimentación correctiva en la enseñanza y aprendizaje de L1 y L2 en el contexto mexicano
Méndez, E. H., Argüelles, L. G., Cervantes, M. M. C., et al. (2022) · Ediciones Comunicación Científica eBooks · doi:10.52501/cc.090
A Comparative Study of Peer Feedback and Teacher Feedback in the Context of ESP Teaching
刘, 巍. (2023) · Overseas English Testing Pedagogy and Research · doi:10.12677/oetpr.2023.51005
Innovative Approaches in Teaching English Writing to Chinese SpeakersPreprint
Teng, M. F. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/nsrkf · Cited by 1
Written Feedback in Health Sciences Education: “What You Write May Be Perceived as Banal”
Jolly, B. C. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-3344-0_52
Positioning Peer Review for Transfer: Authentic Audiences for Career Readiness and Workplace Communication
McCook, N. (2023) · The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2023.1961.2.06 · Cited by 2
Interrogating Peer Review as �Proxy:� Reframing Peer Response within Connective Practice
Halasek, K. (2023) · The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2023.1961.2.04 · Cited by 1

Authors: Tsui, A. B. M., & Ng, M.
Venue: Journal of Second Language Writing
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2000-05
Volume: 9
Issue: 2
Pages: 147-170
ISSN: 1060-3743 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/s1060-3743(00)00022-9
OpenAlex: W2028315260
Semantic Scholar: 02e037b65932a8c3755701134d5bd22e5a379728
Cited by: 648
References: 41
Citations by year: 2026: 24 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 24
FWCI: 24.49
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations: Journal of Second Language Writing (publishedVersion)
The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords: peer feedback, teacher comments, second language writing, writing revision, high school students, cooperative learning, Hong Kong

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Do Secondary L2 Writers Benefit from Peer Comments?

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks