The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do Secondary L2 Writers Benefit from Peer Comments?
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Studies have found that students prefer teacher feedback compared with peer feedback (Jacobs, Curtis, Braine, & Huang, 1998;Nelson & Carson, 1998;Tsui & Ng, 2000;Zhang, 1995)”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Tsui & Ng, 2000
Citations
Cites
Learner Strategies in Language Learning
Ehrman, M. E., Wenden, A. L., & Rubin, J. (1990) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/328531 · Cited by 1,533
Research on Written Composition: New Directions for Teaching
Witte, S. P., Larson, R. L., & Hillocks, G. (1987) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/357721 · Cited by 694
Second Language Writing. Research Insights for the Classroom.
Kroll, B. (1990) · Modern Language Journal · Cited by 656
Student Reactions to Teacher Response in Multiple‐Draft Composition Classrooms*
Ferris, D. (1995) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587804 · Cited by 630
The influence of teacher commentary on student revision
Ferris, D. R. (1997) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588049 · Cited by 618 · cited 1×
“…university ESL students' first drafts and revised drafts and found that text-specific teacher comments in the form of marginal notes, teacher comments that requested information and clarification, and teacher comments on grammar appeared to induce the most substantive revision (see Ferris, 1997).”
BackgroundSalience of Feedback on Error and Its Effect on EFL Writing Quality
Robb, T., Ross, S. J., & Shortreed, I. (1986) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586390 · Cited by 568
Teacher response to student writing: focus on form versus content
Fathman, A. K., & Whalley, E. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524551.016 · Cited by 460
Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction
Mendonça, C. O., Johnson, K. E., & Mendonca, C. O. (1994) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587558 · Cited by 446
Second language composition instruction: developments, issues, and directions in ESL
Silva, T. J. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524551.005 · Cited by 414
Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class
Zhang, S. (1995) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/1060-3743(95)90010-1 · Cited by 405
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Mittan, 1989, The peer review process: harnessing students' communicative power, 207
- Partridge, K.L. (1981). A comparison of the effectiveness of peer vs. teacher evaluation for helping students of English as a second language to improve the quality of their written compositions. MA Thesis, Department of ESL, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
- Pfeiffer, K. (1981). The effects of peer evaluation and personality on writing anxiety and writing performance in college freshmen. Ed. D. Dissertation, Texas Tech University.
- Pierson, H. (1967). Peer and teacher correction: a comparison of the effects of two methods of teaching composition in grade nine English classes. PhD Dissertation, New York University.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 643
Zhao, Y. E., Zhang, F., & Schunn, C. D. (2025) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2025.2512416 · Cited by 2
“Initial research primarily assessed student perceptions of the value of peer feedback for learning (Tsui and ng 2000).”
Arı, B., & Top, M. B. (2018) · Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.19171/uefad.430157 · Cited by 2
The European Conference on Language Learning 2020: Official Conference Proceedings
(2020) · European Conference on Language Learning official conference proceedings · doi:10.22492/issn.2188-112x.2020 · Cited by 3
La negociación de procesos de escritura a través de la video-comunicación
Jauregui, K. (2011) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · doi:10.7203/qfilologia.16.3933 · Cited by 2
“…para utilizar la lengua meta como vehículo de comunicación (Lockhart & Ng, 1995), y favorece la colaboración en la lectura y escritura de textos (Tsui & Ng, 2000), además de estimular procesos de revisión textual, especialmente si los alumnos reciben práctica sobre cómo ofrecer…”
BackgroundAlnasser, S. M. N., & Alyousef, H. S. (2014) · International Journal of English Language Education · doi:10.5296/ijele.v3i1.6764 · Cited by 3
“Various reasons for this acceptance of teacher feedback rather than PF were provided: for instance, students consider teacher feedback to be more trustworthy and professional (Yang, Badger, & Yu, 2006), and to be more significant and more useful (Tsui & Ng, 2000).”
BackgroundJiang, S., & Wang, Q. (2013) · International Journal of Social Media and Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1504/ijsmile.2013.055731 · Cited by 2
“…as ‘peer review’ or ‘peer response’, is a collaborative activity involving students reading, critiquing, and providing feedback on each other’s writing to seek immediate textual improvement and to develop stronger writing competences via mutual scaffolding over time (Tsui and Ng, 2000; Zhu, 2001).”
BackgroundSTUDENTS’ RESPONSES TOWARD PEER REVIEW IN WRITING
Arif, M. (2014) · RETAIN · Cited by 2
PEER ASSESSMENT AS ACTIVE LEARNING METHOD
von Rosen, T. (2014) · Cited by 2
Learning by Assessing in an EFL Writing Class
Holster, T., Pellowe, W. R., Lake, J., & Hahn, A. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37592-7_7 · Cited by 3
SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF MEANING BY ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS FROM DIFFERENT CULTURAL BACKGROUNDS
Turgut, Y. (2006) · Cited by 2
The efficacy of peer review in a university-level ESL writing class
Brathwaite, S. S. (2009) · W. S. Hoole Special Collections Library Manuscript Collections · Cited by 2
How Does Peer Feedback Training Work in EFL Writing?
Gao, M. (2014) · Studies in Foreign Language Education · doi:10.16933/sfle.2014.28.2.295 · Cited by 2
LOOKING INTO THE EFL STUDENTS TYPE OF FEEDBACKS ON PEER CORRECTION ACTIVITY
Yusuf, Y. Q., Silviyanti, T. M., & Tauhidah, R. (2016) · Celt A Journal of Culture English Language Teaching & Literature · doi:10.24167/celt.v16i1.563 · Cited by 2
Busaidi, J. B., & Al-Jamal, D. A. H. (2015) · Journal of Educational and Psychological Studies [JEPS] · doi:10.24200/jeps.vol9iss4pp645-659 · Cited by 2
“Researchers such as Tsui and Ng (2000) and Liu and Hansen (2005) highlighted this move from studying writing itself to reviewing what writers do as they write.”
BackgroundDeveloping Peer Corrective Skills in Business Letter Writing in English as a Foreign Language
Farneste, M., & Pašinska, O. (2019) · Baltic Journal of English Language Literature and Culture · doi:10.22364/bjellc.09.2019.03 · Cited by 2
Student perception on giving peer feedback in EFL writing and its implications
折田, 京. (2016) · Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · Cited by 2
TEACHING EFL WRITING USING GOOGLE DOCS TO PROVIDE FEEDBACK
Wibowo, A. P. (2021) · LLT Journal A Journal on Language and Language Teaching · doi:10.24071/llt.v24i2.3082 · Cited by 2
Collett, D., Evans, S., & Hu, M. (2022) · International Journal of English for Academic Purposes Research and Practice · doi:10.3828/ijeap.2022.5 · Cited by 2
A writing workshop model to enhance students’ skills in writing essays in Sundanese
Kuswari, U., & Dallyono, R. (2022) · Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.17509/ijal.v12i1.46597 · Cited by 2
“Peer feedback may assist students understand good writing by increasing their understanding of their audience as well as their own writing skills and flaws (Lee, 2015; Tsui & Ng, 2000; Yu & Hu, 2017; Zhao, 2014).”
BackgroundExploring Taiwanese EFL Graduate Students Learning Academic Writing
Hsieh, M.-H., & Chuang, H. (2022) · IJET (Indonesian Journal of English Teaching) · doi:10.15642/ijet2.2022.11.1.69-80 · Cited by 2
“Although much writing research on peer review (Berg, 1999), trained peer response (Tsui & Ng, 2000, and teacher feedback (Zhang, 1995; Hyland, 1998) has indicated the benefits of improving students’ writing skills, future research may investigate the factors and the writing professionals’ minds…”
BackgroundThe Impact of Peer and Teacher Feedback Using Twitter on FFL Writing Class
Haeriyati, W. N., Gumilar, D., & Darmawangsa, D. (2023) · Lectura Jurnal Pendidikan · doi:10.31849/lectura.v14i2.15185 · Cited by 2
Confidence in writing: the effect of feedback
Ruegg, R., & Koyama, D. (2010) · Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · Cited by 2
A Contrastive Analysis on Web-based Intercultural Peer Feedback
Wang, Q. (2013) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature · doi:10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.2n.6p.111 · Cited by 2
Empowering Learning: Students and Teachers Outlook on Peer Assessment for Oral Presentation.
Chaqmaqchee, Z. A. I. (2015) · Journals & Books Hosting (International Knowledge Sharing Platform) · Cited by 2
THREE TYPES OF COMMENTS ON CONTENT: TEACHER VS. PEER FEEDBACK
Tajik, L., Fakhari, M., Hashamdar, M., & Zadeh, S. H. (2016) · Journal of teaching language skills · doi:10.22099/jtls.2016.3656 · Cited by 2
“Connor and Asenavages’s (1994), Paulus’s (1999), Tsui and Ng (2000), Miao, Badger, and Zhen (2006), and Peterson and Portier (2014) were among the researches which found that students incorporate much more of the comments provided by teachers compared with the ones made by the other…”
BackgroundLou, Y., Li, Z., Gong, P., & Liu, J. (2016) · Open Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.4236/jss.2016.410007 · Cited by 2
“Functions of Peer Feedback in Group Work Peer feedback can raise learners’ awareness of their strong points and weak points, increase a sense of audience, encourage cooperative learning, and foster ownership [7].”
BackgroundLindschouw, J. (2016) · Pratiques · doi:10.4000/pratiques.3030 · Cited by 2
Student Peer Feedback in a Translation Task
Heine, C. (2019) · Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-5225-3.ch015 · Cited by 6
The Impact of Collaboration on the Process-Based Writing in EFL Classrooms in Saudi Arabia
Hakim, B. (2018) · International Journal of English Linguistics · doi:10.5539/ijel.v8n6p164 · Cited by 2
“Despite the great advantages of peer feedback enumerated so far, there are serious concerns and disadvantages as well (Carson Nelson, 1996; Rollinson, 2005; Tsui & Ng, 2000).”
BackgroundPeer Feedback in Reviewing Essay
Dewi, U. (2019) · SALTeL Journal (Southeast Asia Language Teaching and Learning) · doi:10.35307/saltel.v2i2.26 · Cited by 2
“Research on the other hand has indicated that peer feedback can also contribute to students‟ writing (Jacobs, 1987; Tsui & Ng, 2000; Yang, Badger & Yu, 2006).”
BackgroundMethodA Comparative Study of Teacher Feedback and Automated Essay Scoring in College English Writing
Yinghui, H., & Dan, Z. (2015) · International Journal of Linguistics and Communication · doi:10.15640/ijlc.v3n2a9 · Cited by 2
Teaching, tutoring, and revision
de Cabrera, C. M. (2003) · doi:10.17077/etd.ra6xmz64 · Cited by 2
“…are usually viewed as valuable pedagogical resources that allow students to actively participate in the response dynamics by clarifying their thinking and their teachers’ responses and by collaboratively exploring effective ways of expressing meaning (Goldstein & Conrad, 1990; Tsui and Ng, 2000).”
BackgroundCombining content-based and EAP approaches to academic writing: Towards an eclectic program
Allen, R. J. (2016) · Australasian Journal of Paramedicine · Cited by 2
Wali, F. (2017) · Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) · Cited by 2
Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture, Volume 9
University of Latvia. Faculty of Humanities (2019) · Baltic Journal of English Language Literature and Culture · doi:10.22364/bjellc.09.2019 · Cited by 2
Habilitación lingüística en universitarios
Corral, A. L., Acuña-Meléndrez, K. F., Irigoyen-Morales, J. J., & Jiménez, M. Y. (2020) · Enseñanza e investigación en psicología · doi:10.62364/vnmq6055 · Cited by 1
Exploring Peer Feedback on Writing Assignments in an Online Learning Environment
Pham, A. T. V. (2022) · International Conference on e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning · doi:10.1145/3514262.3514294 · Cited by 1
The Application of Self- and Peer- Assessment to English Writing in Senior High School
Yuan, H. (2022) · Frontiers in Sustainable Development · doi:10.54691/fsd.v2i12.3278 · Cited by 1
Daoud, S., Hussein, E. T., Taha, S., & Al-Namer, A.-S. (2024) · World Journal of English Language · doi:10.5430/wjel.v14n4p215 · Cited by 1
Perceptions of Tertiary Level Students About Peer Feedback in Writing Classes in Bangladesh
Mahmud, R. (2024) · International Journal of English Linguistics · doi:10.5539/ijel.v14n6p160 · Cited by 1
“In their research, Tsui and Ng (2000) identified similar issues among students, noting a lack of trust in their peers’ feedback.”
BackgroundImpact of Teacher and Peer Feedback on University Students' Spelling and Punctuation
Al-Farsi, S., & Slimi, Z. (2025) · European Journal of English Language Studies · doi:10.12973/ejels.5.2.113 · Cited by 3
Afrilyasanti, R., Suharyadi, & Wijayanti, R. (2025) · Journal of Education for Teaching International Research and Pedagogy · doi:10.1080/02607476.2025.2584019 · Cited by 1
“Peer feedback, as an avenue for fostering internal feedback, has been shown to support self-regulation, evaluative judgement, and social skills while gradually increasing learner autonomy (Nicol 2009; Tsui and Ng 2000).”
He, W., & Jin, X. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1804403 · Cited by 1
“Affectively, engagement is characterized by openness and willingness to accept, a receptive attitude toward critique from peers, and by trust in peers’ intentions and competence, which shapes the degree to which feedback is internalized (Tsui and Ng, 2000).”
Hou, S., Guo, Q., Chen, J., Shan, X., Wider, W., & Yang, C. (2026) · Beijing international review of education · doi:10.1177/25902547261485600 · Cited by 1
Empowering peer reviewers to nurture writing skills in peer writers
Attan, A. (2014) · Journal of International Scientific Publications : Language, Individual & Society/Language, individual and society · Cited by 1
La escritura como proceso en español como lengua extranjera: opiniones de los alumnos
Altstaedter, L. L. (2011) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · Cited by 1
Wanchid, R. (2012) · Journal of Multidisciplinary in Social Sciences · Cited by 1
On the Analysis of the Effective Implementation of Peer Feedback in Non-English Majors’ Writing
Yu, Z. (2015) · Studies in literature and language · doi:10.3968/7840 · Cited by 1
“Yang’s (2006) study shows both peer feedback and teacher feedback play a very important role, and it’s necessary to combine the two to help students revise their writing.”
BackgroundThe Dynamics of a Peer Response Group in a Mixed-Level Korean EFL Writing Class
유호정, & Choe, H. (2011) · English Language and Linguistics · doi:10.17960/ell.2011.17.1.008 · Cited by 1
Kim, H.-W. (2009) · English Teaching · doi:10.15858/engtea.64.3.200909.79 · Cited by 1
Spinassé, K. P., & Bolzan, D. B. (2016) · Ilha do Desterro A Journal of English Language Literatures in English and Cultural Studies · doi:10.5007/2175-8026.2016v69n1p95 · Cited by 1
Mateus, C. H. (2015) · Voces y Silencios Revista Latinoamericana de Educación · doi:10.18175/vys6.2.2015.03 · Cited by 1
The Effects of Process-Oriented English Composition Instruction on English Writing Performance
김애주 (2013) · The Jungang Journal of English Language and Literature · doi:10.18853/jjell.2013.55.3.006 · Cited by 1
The effective ways of developing English writing proficiency for pre-service teachers
Joo, J. Y. (2010) · Journal of the Korea English Education Society · doi:10.18649/jkees.2010.9.3.251 · Cited by 1
The Modern Language Classroom: Individuality, Technology, and Context
Sims, E. (2021) · Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) · doi:10.26076/5bbd-2eb6 · Cited by 1
Exploring EFL Teacher's Interventions on Peer Feedback: a Case Study in a Writing Classroom
Suherman, A. (2018) · Metathesis Journal of English Language Literature and Teaching · doi:10.31002/metathesis.v2i2.890 · Cited by 2
“Several studies have revealed that learners generally appreciate teacher feedback (Ferris, 1995, 1997; Tsui & Ng, 2000).”
BackgroundStudy on the Limited Roles of Peer Feedback*
Zhou, D. (2019) · International Conference on Education, Language, Art and Intercultural Communication (ICELAIC) · doi:10.2991/assehr.k.191217.075 · Cited by 1
“Tsui & Ng (2000) found that Hong Kong secondary students viewed the teacher as a "figure of authority that guaranteed quality" and were reluctant to trust their peers.”
BackgroundThe Practical Perceptions of Vietnamese Lecturers and Students Towards Written Peer Feedback
Ho, P. V. P., Thien, N. M., Ly, H. H., et al. (2020) · International Journal of English Linguistics · doi:10.5539/ijel.v10n6p347 · Cited by 1
“…to explain the nature of problems, and give suggestion (Min, 2006; Pham & Usaha, 2016; Pham et al., 2020; Pham, 2019), should be carried out to empower students in learning and create a collaborative learning environment for writing classes (Hyland, 2000; Tsui & Ng, 2000; Hyland & Hyland, 2006).”
BackgroundAli, F. (2020) · International Conference on e-Learning (econf) · doi:10.1109/econf51404.2020.9385493 · Cited by 1
“The student’s perception of the credibility of the source affected those students’ acceptance of the peer feedback, judging it to be as less competent [29] and thus, a conscious decision was made that it cannot be used as a source for improvement.”
BackgroundInteraction and Participation in the Small Group Writing Conference
Yeh, C.-C. (2019) · ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University) · Cited by 1
Du, Q. (2014) · The WAC Clearinghouse; Parlor Press eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2014.0551.2.04 · Cited by 2
Chapter 14. Graduate Writing Workshops: Crossing Languages and Disciplines
Fredericksen, E., & Mangelsdorf, K. (2014) · The WAC Clearinghouse; Parlor Press eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2014.0551.2.14 · Cited by 1
Oral Peer Feedback in A Flipped Speaking Job Interview Class: Practice And Learners’ Attitudes
Sumardi, Anisa, K. D., & Aniq, L. N. (2022) · JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies) · doi:10.30762/jeels.v7i2.214 · Cited by 1
Crook, S. (2022) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.58680/ccc202231879 · Cited by 2
Teacher-initiated vs. student-initiated written corrective feedback in EFL writing
Naghdipour, B. (2023) · Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching · doi:10.56040/bana2012 · Cited by 1
Kim, S. (2023) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688231193074 · Cited by 1
“However, recent studies have challenged this view, suggesting that scaffolding occurs among peers and not just with guidance from the more knowl-edgeable other (e.g. de Guerrero & Villamil, 2000; Tsui & Ng, 2000).”
Peer response in Chinese as a foreign language context: A classroom-based case study
Zhu, W. Y., & Qin, X. (2022) · Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching · doi:10.56040/wzxq1926 · Cited by 2
“Other studies have examined student use of peer feedback in comparison to teacher feedback and have reported divergent results (Connor & Asenavage, 1994; Paulus, 1999; Tsui & Ng, 2000; Yang et al, 2006; Zhao, 2010).”
Unveiling learning regulations through reflective notes
Li, J. (2023) · Language Education & Assessment · doi:10.29140/lea.v6n1.1235 · Cited by 2
Impact of a YouTube Channel on ESL Students' Oral Skills in a Peruvian Higher Institute
Gutiérrez-Huancayo, V. R. (2024) · World Journal of English Language · doi:10.5430/wjel.v14n5p392 · Cited by 3
Exploring Learner Engagement with the AWE-Peer-Teacher Feedback Mode in L2 Writing
Zhou, S., Liu, Q., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-4246-2_3 · Cited by 2
Triadic oral peer feedback: Does EFL learners’ L2 proficiency pairing play a role?
Zhao, N., Tian, L., & Carhill‐Poza, A. (2024) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/ijal.12598 · Cited by 2
Experiences of learning and support in online courses in open university studies
Kokko, T., Häkkinen, P., Pirttimaa, R., & Hakkarainen, A. M. (2025) · Human Technology · doi:10.14254/1795-6889.2025.21-2.9 · Cited by 1
CORPORA IN THE LANGUAGE CLASSROOM: A GUIDE TO USAGE
Canning, N. (2014) · Cited by 1
Introducing Peer Collaboration in a Networked English Writing Class
Zhao, H. (2013) · Advances in mobile and distance learning book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-4486-1.ch005 · Cited by 1
“Peer assessment played a complementary role to teacher assessment by focusing on different language aspects of writing and covering areas unaddressed by teachers (e.g. Caulk, 1994; Tsui and Ng, 2000).”
BackgroundErskine, R. S. (2008) · USF Scholarship Repository (University of San Francisco) · Cited by 1
A revisão colaborativa e a produção textual em língua inglesa: o ponto de vista do aprendiz
Soares, D. D. A. (2008) · Cadernos do IL · doi:10.22456/2236-6385.18915 · Cited by 1
Chinese College Students' Abilities and Attitudes for Peer Review
Jie, Z. (2011) · Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1515/cjal.2011.033 · Cited by 1
“Socially, peer review brings a sense of audience into the writing classroom (Jacobs et al., 1998; Paulus, 1999; Tsui & Ng, 2000; Zhang, 1995).”
BackgroundAkteruzzaman, M., & Chowdhury, A. U. (2015) · IJAEDU- International E-Journal of Advances in Education · doi:10.18768/ijaedu.51532 · Cited by 1
“Moreover, while receiving feedback from the peers, students feel less anxious in comparison with receiving feedback from the teacher (Tsui & M., 2000).”
How EFL Students Take a Position in Peer Feedback Activities: An Activity Theory Perspective
Huh, M.-H. (2012) · The Journal of English Language and Literature · doi:10.15794/jell.2012.58.6.005 · Cited by 1
Duggan, J., & Ofte, I. (2016) · Norsk pedagogisk tidsskrift · doi:10.18261/issn.1504-2987-2016-03-05 · Cited by 5
Teacher and peer feedback: Learner perceptions and the efficacy for improvement in L2 writing
주미진, & 김양희 (2010) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.17936/pkelt.2010.22.3.001 · Cited by 1
Amelia, R., & Rusmanayanti, A. (2017) · SEA-DR (South East Asia Development Research) International Conference (SEADRIC) · doi:10.2991/seadric-17.2017.17 · Cited by 1
“Peer feedback is believed to be able to enhance a sense of audience [25], provides instant feedback with variety of suggestions [17], and prepares the students to work with their work later on by learning from others’ strengths and weaknesses [17][19].”
BackgroundSocial Dynamics During Peer Response: Patterns of Interaction in the L2PR Corpus
Friginal, E., Lee, J. J., Polat, B., & Roberson, A. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59900-7_12 · Cited by 1
Lam, R. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-6653-6_9 · Cited by 1
Habilitación lingüística y corrección de la escritura con señalización de errores
Corral, A. L., Acuña-Meléndrez, K. F., Irigoyen-Morales, J. J., & Córdova-Cárdenas, G.-M. (2020) · Journal of Behavior Health & Social Issues · doi:10.22201/fesi.20070780.2020.12.1.75672 · Cited by 1
“…encontradas que afirman (Min, 2016; Rahimi, 2013; Zimmerman & Kitsantas, 2002) o niegan según sea el caso (Storch, 2007; Truscott & Hsu, 2008; Tsui & Ng, 2000) que la revisión y corrección afecta tanto aspectos de forma como de contenido, en realidad el texto en sí sería necesario pero no…”
BackgroundWriting Anxiety and Facebook-mediated Feedback
Yufrizal, H., Sutarsyah, C., & Sudirman, S. (2020) · Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal · doi:10.14738/assrj.77.8628
PEER ASSESSMENT IN UNIVERSITY LEVEL: A PRELIMINARY STUDY ON THE RELIABILITY
Halim, S. W. (2021) · CaLLs (Journal of Culture Arts Literature and Linguistics) · doi:10.30872/calls.v6i2.3804 · Cited by 1
Liu, X. (2022) · Theory and Practice in Language Studies · doi:10.17507/tpls.1208.11 · Cited by 1
“…concerned with the focus on the effectiveness based on rubric dimension of a reviewer or reviewee’s comments, a pedagogical syllabus design of a peer feedback course, reviewers’ or reviewees’ identify, or even the reasonableness and accuracy of comments towards L2 writing problems (Tsui & Ng, 2000”
BackgroundFerrari, S., & Grassi, R. (2023) · Italiano LinguaDue · doi:10.54103/2037-3597/19625 · Cited by 1
Almutairi, R. T. (2023) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v16n4p88 · Cited by 1
“Numerous empirical studies have supported the importance of peer response in L2/FL writing classrooms at the college and school levels (Palevel, 1999; Tsui & Ng, 2000; Min, 2006; Yu & Lee, 2016).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialVerdonschot, S. G. M., & Kwakman, K. (2004) · University of Twente Research Information · Cited by 1
Altstaedter, L. L. (2009) · Cited by 1
Sun, Y., & Doman, E. (2018) · The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching · doi:10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0330 · Cited by 1
English Language Teaching, Vol.1, No.1, June 2008
Editor, E. L. T. (2008) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v1n1p0 · Cited by 1
Latino Students and Biliteracy at a University: Literacy Histories, Agency, and Writing.
Stegemoller, W. J. (2009)
Peer evaluation in a Filipino L2 speech class: "Speaking the unspeakable?"
Rojo-Laurilla, M. A. (2005)
Collaboration and Writing: More than Exchanging Words
Reed, K. (2014) · Asian Journal of English Language Teaching · doi:10.65961/ajelt-2014-1-002
“…earlier studies have strongly indicated that students can make positive revisions when they have been trained on the process (Stanley, 1992; Berg, 1999; Paulus, 1999; Tsui & Ng, 2000), this generally high rating was expected and supports the positive results that peer review with training can have.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialElectronic Peer Feedback in a Collaborative Classroom
Branham, C. (2012) · Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)
Implementation of Peer Reviews: Online Learning
Colella-Sandercock, J. A., Verbora, A. R., Morrison, O.-P., & Singleton-Jackson, J. A. (2015) · International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsui, A. B. M., & Ng, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Second Language Writing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 147-170
- ISSN
- 1060-3743 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2028315260
- Semantic Scholar
- 02e037b65932a8c3755701134d5bd22e5a379728
- Cited by
- 648
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 24.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Second Language Writing (publishedVersion)
- The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- peer feedback, teacher comments, second language writing, writing revision, high school students, cooperative learning, Hong Kong
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review