The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The F-Box Protein Skp2 Participates in c-Myc Proteosomal Degradation and Acts as a Cofactor for c-Myc-Regulated Transcription
Abstract
The transcription regulatory oncoprotein c-Myc controls genes involved in cell growth, apoptosis, and oncogenesis. c-Myc is turned over very quickly through the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway. The proteins involved in this process are still unknown. We have found that Skp2 interacts with c-Myc and participates in its ubiquitylation and degradation. The interaction between Skp2 and c-Myc occurs during the G1 to S phase transition of the cell cycle in normal lymphocytes. Surprisingly, Skp2 enhances c-Myc-induced S phase transition and activates c-Myc target genes in a Myc-dependent manner. Further, Myc-induced transcription was shown to be Skp2 dependent, suggesting interdependence between c-Myc and Skp2 in activation of transcription. Moreover, Myc-dependent association of Skp2, ubiquitylated proteins, and subunits of the proteasome to a c-Myc target promoter was demonstrated in vivo. The results suggest that Skp2 is a transcriptional cofactor for c-Myc and indicates a close relationship between transcription activation and transcription factor ubiquitination.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In fact, the Skp2 ubiquitin ligase is a coactivator of c-Myc at the cyclin D2 promoter and loss of Skp2 can stabilize c-Myc protein levels and reduce transactivation of c-Myc-responsive promoters (Kim et al. 2003; von der Lehr et al. 2003).”
From Identification of a novel telomerase repressor that interacts with the human papillomavirus type-16 E6/E6-AP complex (2004) · cites this paper as von der Lehr et al. 2003
In the citing paper
“In fact, the Skp2 ubiquitin ligase is a coactivator of c-Myc at the cyclin D2 promoter and loss of Skp2 can stabilize c-Myc protein levels and reduce transactivation of c-Myc-responsive promoters (Kim et al. 2003; von der Lehr et al. 2003).”
From Identification of a novel telomerase repressor that interacts with the human papillomavirus type-16 E6/E6-AP complex (2004) · cites this paper as von der Lehr et al. 2003
Citations
Cites
The novel ATM-related protein TRRAP is an essential cofactor for the c-Myc and E2F oncoproteins
McMahon, S. B., Van Buskirk, H. A., Dugan, K. A., Copeland, T. D., & Cole, M. D. (1998) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81479-8 · Cited by 693
The essential cofactor TRRAP recruits the histone acetyltransferase hGCN5 to c-Myc
McMahon, S. B., Wood, M. A., & Cole, M. D. (2000) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.20.2.556-562.2000 · Cited by 494
Recruitment of a 19 S Proteasome Subcomplex to an Activated Promoter
Gonzalez, F., Delahodde, A., Kodadek, T., & Johnston, S. A. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1069490 · Cited by 338
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- Amati, 2001, Function of the c-Myc oncoprotein in chromatin remodeling and transcription, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1471, M135
- Bahram, 1999, Posttranslational regulation of Myc function in response to phorbol ester/interferon-gamma-induced differentiation of v-Myc-transformed U-937 monoblasts, Blood, 93, 3900, 10.1182/blood.V93.11.3900 · DOI
- Bahram, 2000, c-Myc hot spot mutations in lymphomas result in inefficient ubiquitination and decreased proteasome-mediated turnover, Blood, 95, 2104, 10.1182/blood.V95.6.2104 · DOI
- Beier, 2000, Induction of cyclin E-cdk2 kinase activity, E2F-dependent transcription and cell growth by Myc are genetically separable events, EMBO J., 19, 5813, 10.1093/emboj/19.21.5813 · DOI
- Bouchard, 2001, Regulation of cyclin D2 gene expression by the Myc/Max/Mad network, Genes Dev., 15, 2042, 10.1101/gad.907901 · DOI
- Brower, 2002, Mammalian mediator subunit mMED8 is an Elongin BC-interacting protein that can assemble with Cul2 and Rbx1 to reconstitute a ubiquitin ligase, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 10353, 10.1073/pnas.162424199 · DOI
- Carrano, 1999, SKP2 is required for ubiquitin-mediated degradation of the CDK inhibitor p27, Nat. Cell Biol., 1, 193, 10.1038/12013 · DOI
- Chi, 2001, Negative regulation of Gcn4 and Msn2 transcription factors by Srb10 cyclin-dependent kinase, Genes Dev., 15, 1078, 10.1101/gad.867501 · DOI
- Conaway, 2002, Emerging roles of ubiquitin in transcription regulation, Science, 296, 1254, 10.1126/science.1067466 · DOI
- DeSalle, 2001, Regulation of the G1 to S transition by the ubiquitin pathway, FEBS Lett., 490, 179, 10.1016/S0014-5793(01)02121-4 · DOI
- Desbarats, 1996, Discrimination between different E-box-binding proteins at an endogenous target gene of c-myc, Genes Dev., 10, 447, 10.1101/gad.10.4.447 · DOI
- Elbashir, 2001, Duplexes of 21-nucleotide RNAs mediate RNA interference in cultured mammalian cells, Nature, 411, 494, 10.1038/35078107 · DOI · Paper page
- Ferdous, 2001, The 19S regulatory particle of the proteasome is required for efficient transcription elongation by RNA polymerase II, Mol. Cell, 7, 981, 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00250-7 · DOI
- Flinn, 1998, myc boxes, which are conserved in myc family proteins, are signals for protein degradation via the proteasome, Mol. Cell. Biol., 18, 5961, 10.1128/MCB.18.10.5961 · DOI
- Frank, 2001, Binding of c-Myc to chromatin mediates mitogen-induced acetylation of histone H4 and gene activation, Genes Dev., 15, 2069, 10.1101/gad.906601 · DOI
- Grandori, 2000, The Myc/Max/Mad network and the transcriptional control of cell behavior, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol., 16, 653, 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.16.1.653 · DOI · Paper page
- Gregory, 2000, c-Myc proteolysis by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, Mol. Cell. Biol., 20, 2423, 10.1128/MCB.20.7.2423-2435.2000 · DOI
- Gstaiger, 2001, Skp2 is oncogenic and overexpressed in human cancers, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 5043, 10.1073/pnas.081474898 · DOI
- Hershko, 1998, The ubiquitin system, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 67, 425, 10.1146/annurev.biochem.67.1.425 · DOI · Paper page
- Hu, 2002, Visualization of interactions among bZIP and Rel family proteins in living cells using bimolecular fluorescence complementation, Mol. Cell, 9, 789, 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00496-3 · DOI
- Kaiser, 2000, Regulation of transcription by ubiquitination without proteolysis, Cell, 102, 303, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00036-2 · DOI
- Kato, 1990, An amino-terminal c-myc domain required for neoplastic transformation activates transcription, Mol. Cell. Biol., 10, 5914, 10.1128/MCB.10.11.5914 · DOI
- Kuras, 2002, Dual regulation of the met4 transcription factor by ubiquitin-dependent degradation and inhibition of promoter recruitment, Mol. Cell, 10, 69, 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00561-0 · DOI
- Latres, 2001, Role of the F-box protein Skp2 in lymphomagenesis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 2515, 10.1073/pnas.041475098 · DOI
- Lisztwan, 1998, Association of human CUL-1 and ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme CDC34 with the F-box protein p45(SKP2), EMBO J., 17, 368, 10.1093/emboj/17.2.368 · DOI
- Mateyak, 1997, Phenotypes of c-Myc-deficient rat fibroblasts isolated by targeted homologous recombination, Cell Growth Differ., 8, 1039
- Molinari, 1999, Proteasome-mediated degradation of transcriptional activators correlates with activation domain potency in vivo, EMBO J., 18, 6439, 10.1093/emboj/18.22.6439 · DOI
- Muratani, 2003, How the ubiquitin-proteasome system controls transcription, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 4, 192, 10.1038/nrm1049 · DOI · Paper page
- Nakayama, 2000, Targeted disruption of Skp2 results in accumulation of cyclin E and p27(Kip1), polyploidy and centrosome overduplication, EMBO J., 19, 2069, 10.1093/emboj/19.9.2069 · DOI
- Ottosen, 2002, Transcription. Proteasome parts at gene promoters, Science, 296, 479, 10.1126/science.1071270 · DOI
- Salghetti, 1999, Destruction of Myc by ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis, EMBO J., 18, 717, 10.1093/emboj/18.3.717 · DOI
- Salghetti, 2000, Functional overlap of sequences that activate transcription and signal ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 3118, 10.1073/pnas.97.7.3118 · DOI
- Salghetti, 2001, Regulation of transcriptional activation domain function by ubiquitin, Science, 293, 1651, 10.1126/science.1062079 · DOI
- Sears, 1999, Ras enhances Myc protein stability, Mol. Cell, 3, 169, 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80308-1 · DOI
- Sutterluty, 1999, p45SKP2 promotes p27Kip1 degradation and induces S phase in quiescent cells, Nat. Cell Biol., 1, 207, 10.1038/12027 · DOI
- Treier, 1994, Ubiquitin-dependent c-Jun degradation in vivo is mediated by the delta domain, Cell, 78, 787, 10.1016/S0092-8674(94)90502-9 · DOI
- Weissman, 2001, Themes and variations on ubiquitylation, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2, 169, 10.1038/35056563 · DOI
- Zeller, 2001, Characterization of nucleophosmin (B23) as a Myc target by scanning chromatin immunoprecipitation, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 48285, 10.1074/jbc.M108506200 · DOI
Cited by
Function and regulation of cullin–RING ubiquitin ligases
Petroski, M. D., & Deshaies, R. J. (2005) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1547 · Cited by 2,148
Farrell, A. S., & Sears, R. C. (2014) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a014365 · Cited by 468
An Overview of MYC and Its Interactome
Conacci-Sorrell, M., McFerrin, L., & Eisenman, R. N. (2014) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a014357 · Cited by 408
Chan, C.-H., Morrow, J. K., Li, C.-F., Gao, Y., Jin, G., Moten, A., Stagg, L. J., Ladbury, J. E., Cai, Z., Xu, D., et al. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.06.048 · Cited by 391
Target gene-independent functions of MYC oncoproteins
Baluapuri, A., Wolf, E., & Eilers, M. (2020) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-020-0215-2 · Cited by 310
Gewin, L., Myers, H., Kiyono, T., & Galloway, D. A. (2004) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1214704 · Cited by 277
The c‐myc Promoter: Still MysterY and Challenge
(2008) · Advances in Cancer Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-230x(07)99004-1 · Cited by 211
Deciphering the transcriptional complex critical for RhoA gene expression and cancer metastasis
Chan, C.-H., Lee, S.-W., Li, C.-F., Wang, J., Yang, W.-L., Wu, C.-Y., Wu, J., Nakayama, K. I., Kang, H.-Y., Huang, H.-Y., et al. (2010) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb2047 · Cited by 209
Self-citationCarabet, L. A., Rennie, P. S., & Cherkasov, A. (2018) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20010120 · Cited by 172
“Moreover, MBII is involved in Myc protein turnover as is a docking site for SKP2, the E3 ubiquitin ligase component S-phase kinase-associated protein 2 that, in addition to FBW7, is involved in the degradation of Myc [44,45].”
BackgroundHatakeyama, S., Watanabe, M., Fujii, Y., & Nakayama, K. I. (2005) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-1581 · Cited by 67
Self-citationLiu, L., & Eisenman, R. N. (2012) · Genes & Cancer · doi:10.1177/1947601912448067 · Cited by 47
Li, X., Li, S., Li, B., Li, Y., Aman, S., Xia, K., Yang, Y., Ahmad, B., & Wu, H. (2021) · npj Precision Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41698-021-00158-3 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- von der Lehr, N., Johansson, S., Wu, S., Bahram, F., Castell, A., Cetinkaya, C., Hydbring, P., Weidung, I., Nakayama, K., Nakayama, K. I., Söderberg, O., Kerppola, T. K., & Larsson, L.-G.
- Venue
- Molecular Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1189-1200
- ISSN
- 1097-2765
- Cited by
- 408
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review