Cited by 1,333Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsCancer-related Molecular PathwaysDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation

The Myc/Max/Mad Network and the Transcriptional Control of Cell Behavior

Grandori, Carla, Cowley, Shaun M., James, Leonard P., Eisenman, Robert N.·2000·Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology

Abstract

The Myc/Max/Mad network comprises a group of transcription factors whose distinct interactions result in gene-specific transcriptional activation or repression. A great deal of research indicates that the functions of the network play roles in cell proliferation, differentiation, and death. In this review we focus on the Myc and Mad protein families and attempt to relate their biological functions to their transcriptional activities and gene targets. Both Myc and Mad, as well as the more recently described Mnt and Mga proteins, form heterodimers with Max, permitting binding to specific DNA sequences. These DNA-bound heterodimers recruit coactivator or corepressor complexes that generate alterations in chromatin structure, which in turn modulate transcription. Initial identification of target genes suggests that the network regulates genes involved in the cell cycle, growth, life span, and morphology. Because Myc and Mad proteins are expressed in response to diverse signaling pathways, the network can be viewed as a functional module which acts to convert environmental signals into specific gene-regulatory programs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.16.1.653

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MAX binds to DNA as a dimer and facilitates cooperative activity with a range of partners.

    “MAX canonically recognizes a short, common sequence (the domain CACGTG), but its structure leads it to bind to DNA as a dimer, and facilitates cooperative activity with a range of partners (Grandori et al., 2000) with many weaker and longer-range sequence determinants of binding (Allevato et al., 2017).”

    From WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts (2020) · cites this paper as Grandori et al., 2000

  • MAX canonically recognizes a short, common sequence (the domain CACGTG).

    “MAX canonically recognizes a short, common sequence (the domain CACGTG), but its structure leads it to bind to DNA as a dimer, and facilitates cooperative activity with a range of partners (Grandori et al., 2000) with many weaker and longer-range sequence determinants of binding (Allevato et al., 2017).”

    From WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts (2020) · cites this paper as Grandori et al., 2000

  • Net-like is most similar to the Drosophila bHLH transcriptional repressor Net at 35% identity and almost equally similar to members of the Myc and Max families.

    “When compared to the databases, the Net-like protein is most similar to the Drosophila bHLH transcriptional repressor Net (35% identity; Brentrup et al., 2000) and almost equally similar to the members of the Myc and Max families”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grandori, C., Cowley, S. M., James, L. P., & Eisenman, R. N.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology
Published
2000-11
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
653-699
ISSN
  • 1081-0706 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8995
OpenAlex
W2149357952
Cited by
1,333
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 53
FWCI
4.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r29ca075125-05)
  • National Cancer Institute (R29CA75125, R01CA057138, R01CA020525)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Keywords
Myc proteins, Mad proteins, Max protein, transcription factors, heterodimerization, coactivator complexes, corepressor complex, chromatin structure, transcriptional regulation, cell proliferation, cell differentiation, cell death, cell cycle, lifespan, cell morphology, signaling pathways
MeSH terms
Animals, DNA-Binding Proteins, Humans, Repressor Proteins, Transcription Factors, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc, Oncogene Protein p55(v-myc), Helix-Loop-Helix Motifs, Basic-Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review