The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reduced incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis associated with enteral administration of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium infantis to neonates in an intensive care unit
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) has been associated with a wide variety of bacteria and their cytotoxins. The content and the nature of gut bacterial colonization in newborns that require intensive care hospitalization has been demonstrated to be abnormal. In the 25-bed neonatal intensive care unit in Hospital Simon Bolivar, in Bogotá, Colombia, cases of NEC are common causes of morbidity and mortality. This article examines the hypothesis that oral administration of prophylactic Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium infantis to all neonates in an intensive care unit, would decrease the incidence of NEC. METHODS: Daily doses of 250 million live L. acidophilus and 250 million B. infantis were given to all 1237 newborns (both inpatients and transfer patients) admitted to the unit during 1 year, until they were discharged from the hospital. In this study, 1282 patients hospitalized during the previous year were used as controls. RESULTS: There were no complications attributed to the daily administration of L. acidophilus and B. infantis. The study groups were compared for place of origin, clinical, and demographic variables, and there was no statistically significant difference in those variables. In the historic control group, there were 85 NEC cases compared to 34 cases in the group that received probiotic prophylaxis (P < 0.0002). In the historic control group, there were 35 NEC-associated fatalities compared to 14 fatalities in the group that received probiotic prophylaxis (P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The positive results in this study support the need for further investigation of bacterial colonization and its role in NEC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lin, H.-C., Su, B.-H., Chen, A.-C., Lin, T.-W., Tsai, C.-H., Yeh, T.-F., & Oh, W. (2005) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2004-1463 · Cited by 660
Oral Probiotics Prevent Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Very Low Birth Weight Neonates
Bin-Nun, A., Bromiker, R., Wilschanski, M., Kaplan, M., Rudensky, B., Caplan, M., & Hammerman, C. (2005) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.03.054 · Cited by 590
A systematic review of the safety of probiotics
Didari, T., Solki, S., Mozaffari, S., Nikfar, S., & Abdollahi, M. (2014) · Expert Opinion on Drug Safety · doi:10.1517/14740338.2014.872627 · Cited by 367
Gupta, V, & Garg, R. (2009) · Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.4103/0255-0857.53201 · Cited by 283
Whelan, K., & Myers, C. E. (2010) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.2009.28759 · Cited by 161
Deshmukh, M., & Patole, S. (2021) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.1093/advances/nmaa164 · Cited by 78
The probiotic approach: An alternative treatment option in urology
Hoesl, C. E., & Altwein, J. E. (2005) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2004.09.011 · Cited by 78
Probiotics Used in Human Studies
Montrose, D. C., & Floch, M. H. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology · doi:10.1097/01.mcg.0000165649.32371.71 · Cited by 60
Effects of probiotics on the gastrointestinal tract
Snelling, A. M. (2005) · Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1097/01.qco.0000182103.32504.e3 · Cited by 46
Arboleya, S., Stanton, C., Ryan, C. A., Dempsey, E., & Ross, P. R. (2016) · Annual Review of Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1146/annurev-food-041715-033151 · Cited by 41
Safety Assessment of Probiotics
Lahtinen, S. J., Boyle, R. J., Margolles, A., Frias, R., & Gueimonde, M. (2009) · Prebiotics and Probiotics Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-79058-9_31 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoyos, A. B.
- Venue
- International Journal of Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 197-202
- ISSN
- 1201-9712 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2078170081
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.