Cited by 191Cognitive Abilities and TestingGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genetics and general cognitive ability (g)

Plomin, Robert, Spinath, Frank M.·2002·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Two recent articles in this journal made the case for the existence and importance of g and reviewed research on cognitive and psychophysical correlates of psychometric g. This review considers g from a genetic perspective. Multivariate genetic research indicates that g accounts for nearly all of the genetic variance of diverse psychometric cognitive tests (genetic g). Recent research suggests not only that elementary cognitive tasks are genetically linked to psychometric g but also that genetic g pervades these tasks. Contrary to the assumption of modularity that dominates cognitive science, genetic g exists in the mind as well as in psychometric tests.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01853-2

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 0 references

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Deary, 2001, Human intelligence differences: a recent history, Trends Cogn. Sci., 5, 127, 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01621-1 · DOI
  2. Deary, 2001, Human intelligence differences: towards a combined experimental–differential approach, Trends Cogn. Sci., 5, 164, 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01623-5 · DOI
  3. McClearn, 1997, Substantial genetic influence on cognitive abilities in twins 80+ years old, Science, 276, 1560, 10.1126/science.276.5318.1560 · DOI
  4. Pedersen, 1994, Is there G beyond g? (Is there genetic influence on specific cognitive abilities independent of genetic influence on general cognitive ability?), Intelligence, 18, 133, 10.1016/0160-2896(94)90024-8 · DOI
  5. Petrill, 1997, Molarity versus modularity of cognitive functioning? A behavioral genetic perspective, Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci., 6, 96, 10.1111/1467-8721.ep11512833 · DOI
  6. Detterman, 1987, Theoretical notions of intelligence and mental retardation, Am. J. Ment. Defic., 92, 2
  7. Detterman, 2000, General intelligence and the definition of phenotypes, 136, 10.1002/0470870850.ch9 · DOI
  8. Neubauer, 2000, Genetic (and environmental) influence on two measures of speed of information processing and their relation to psychometric intelligence: evidence from the German Observational Study of Adult Twins, Intelligence, 28, 267, 10.1016/S0160-2896(00)00036-2 · DOI
  9. Vernon, 1989, The heritability of measures of speed of information–processing, Pers. Individ. Diff., 10, 575, 10.1016/0191-8869(89)90040-8 · DOI
  10. Spinath, 2000, Genetic and environmental influences on reaction times: evidence from behavioral-genetic research, Psychologische Beitrage, 42, 201
  11. Rijsdijk, 1998, The genetic basis of the relation between speed-of-information processing and IQ, Behav. Brain Res., 95, 77, 10.1016/S0166-4328(97)00212-X · DOI
  12. Luciano, M. et al. Genetic influence on the relationship between choice reaction time and IQ: a twin study. Moscow J. Foreign Psychol. (in press).
  13. Petrill, 1995, The genetic and environmental variance underlying elementary cognitive tasks, Behav. Genet., 25, 199, 10.1007/BF02197178 · DOI
  14. Petrill, 1996, The independent prediction of general intelligence by elementary cognitive tasks: genetic and environmental influences, Behav. Genet., 26, 135, 10.1007/BF02359891 · DOI
  15. Baker, 1991, The genetic correlation between intelligence and speed of information processing, Behav. Genet., 21, 351, 10.1007/BF01065972 · DOI
  16. Grudnik, J.L. et al. Meta-analysis of the relationship between intelligence and inspection time. Intelligence (in press) · DOI
  17. Luciano, 2001, On the heritability of inspection time and its covariance with IQ: a twin study, Intelligence, 29, 443, 10.1016/S0160-2896(01)00071-X · DOI
  18. Posthuma, 2001, Perceptual speed and IQ are associated through common genetic factors, Behav. Genet., 31, 593, 10.1023/A:1013349512683 · DOI
  19. Luciano, M. et al. Genetic covariance between processing speed and IQ. In Behavioral Genetics in a Postgenomic Era (Plomin, R. et al., eds), The American Psychological Association (in press). · DOI
  20. Deary, 1997, Neuroscience and human intelligence differences, Trends Neurosci., 20, 365, 10.1016/S0166-2236(97)01070-9 · DOI
  21. Rijsdijk, 1995, Genetic analysis of peripheral nerve conduction velocity in twins, Behav. Genet., 25, 348, 10.1007/BF02197283 · DOI
  22. Rijsdijk, 1997, Genetic mediation of the correlation between peripheral nerve conduction velocity and IQ, Behav. Genet., 27, 87, 10.1023/A:1025600423013 · DOI
  23. Posthuma, 2001, Are smarter brains running faster? Heritability of alpha peak frequency and IQ and their interrelation, Behav. Genet., 31, 567, 10.1023/A:1013345411774 · DOI
  24. van Baal, 1998, Genetic influences on EEG coherence in 5-year-old twins, Behav. Genet., 28, 9, 10.1023/A:1021400613723 · DOI
  25. van Baal, G.C.M. et al. Genetics of EEG coherence and IQ in young twins. Behav. Genet. (in press)
  26. Van Beijsterveldt, 1998, Genetic and environmental influences on EEG coherence, Behav. Genet., 28, 443, 10.1023/A:1021637328512 · DOI
  27. Engle, 1999, Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent–variable approach, J. Exp. Psychol. Gen., 128, 309, 10.1037/0096-3445.128.3.309 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Kyllonen, 1990, Reasoning ability is (little more than) working memory capacity, Intelligence, 14, 389, 10.1016/S0160-2896(05)80012-1 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Stauffer, J.M. et al. (1996) Cognitive-components tests are not much more than g: an extension of Kyllonen's analyses. J. Gen. Psychol. 193–205. · DOI
  30. Finkel, 2000, Genetic mediation of the associations among motor and perceptual speed and adult cognitive abilities, Aging Neuropsychol. Cogn., 7, 141, 10.1076/1382-5585(200009)7:3;1-Q;FT141 · DOI
  31. Thompson, 2001, Genetic influences on brain structure, Nat. Neurosci., 4, 1253, 10.1038/nn758 · DOI
  32. Hunt, 1980, Intelligence as an information processing concept, Br. J. Psychol., 71, 449, 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1980.tb01760.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Plomin, R., & Spinath, F. M.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Plomin, Robert
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-04
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
169-176
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150925047
Cited by
191
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
general intelligence, heritability of intelligence, genetic variance, cognitive modularity, psychometric tests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review