Cited by 1,256Embodied and Extended CognitionCategorization, perception, and languagePhilosophy and Theoretical Science

Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems

Barsalou, Lawrence W., Kyle Simmons, W., Barbey, Aron K., Wilson, Christine D.·2003·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

The human conceptual system contains knowledge that supports all cognitive activities, including perception, memory, language and thought. According to most current theories, states in modality-specific systems for perception, action and emotion do not represent knowledge - rather, redescriptions of these states in amodal representational languages do. Increasingly, however, researchers report that re-enactments of states in modality-specific systems underlie conceptual processing. In behavioral experiments, perceptual and motor variables consistently produce effects in conceptual tasks. In brain imaging experiments, conceptual processing consistently activates modality-specific brain areas. Theoretical research shows how modality-specific re-enactments could produce basic conceptual functions, such as the type-token distinction, categorical inference, productivity, propositions and abstract concepts. Together these empirical results and theoretical analyses implicate modality-specific systems in the representation and use of conceptual knowledge.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1364-6613(02)00029-3

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barsalou, L. W., Kyle Simmons, W., Barbey, A. K., & Wilson, C. D.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Barsalou, Lawrence W.
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-02
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
84-91
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2117865617
Cited by
1,256
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 92 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 67 · 2013: 75 · 2012: 54
FWCI
3.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
conceptual knowledge, reenactment, conceptual processing, perception, motor system, emotions, amodal representation, type-token distinction, abstract concepts, propositional thought

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review