Cited by 135Embodied and Extended CognitionPhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceCognitive Science and Education Research

A Moderate Approach to Embodied Cognitive Science

Goldman, Alvin I.·2012·Review of Philosophy and Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13164-012-0089-0

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Goldman proposed categorizing theories as conservative (no embodiment), moderate or lightly embodied (bodily information influences cognition), or radical (enactive and extended approaches arguing that the brain-body-environment is a dynamical system which constitutes cognition sans representation).

    “Here Goldman proposed categorizing theories as ‘conservative’ (no embodiment at all, as in the case of strict modularity, nativism, etc), moderate or ‘lightly’ embodied (bodily information—encoded in B-formatted representations—influences cognition), or ‘radical’ (i.e., enactive and extended approaches arguing that the brain-body-environment is a dynamical system which constitutes cognition sans”
  • Moderately embodied cognition invokes the massive redeployment of bodily representations to contextualize cognition.

    “Moderately embodied cognition thus invokes the ‘massive redeployment’ (c.f., Anderson 2007) of bodily representations (b-representations) to contextualize cognition:”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldman, A. I.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Goldman, Alvin I.
Venue
Review of Philosophy and Psychology
Published
2012-03
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
71-88
ISSN
  • 1878-5158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1878-5166
OpenAlex
W1977564926
Cited by
135
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10
FWCI
3.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Review of Philosophy and Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
Keywords
embodied cognition, bodily states, philosophy of mind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review